Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

200R4 or 700R4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2013, 03:45 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
RedMan*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Spokane Wa.
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 200R4 or 700R4

How come no one uses them anymore ?
I have a 62 Bel Air so I'm not interested in cutting up my floor to fit a massive trans in there.
Right now I'm looking @ the 200R4 for my first choice.

Just curious…………….thanks.
Old 11-30-2013, 05:16 PM
  #2  
Moderator
 
mrvedit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 7,120
Received 426 Likes on 325 Posts

Default

A 4L60E is exactly the same size as a 700R4; basically the same case. If you are controlling the engine with a PCM, you might as well use the 4L60E. Some people that running a carburated LS engine are indeed using the 700R4 or 200R4, but that is a much rarer case.
Old 11-30-2013, 09:13 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
RedMan*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Spokane Wa.
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you for the reply.
I did neglect to mention that I am doing a carb'd L-33 5.3
Here's the vehicle in question:
Old 12-05-2013, 04:36 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Exeodus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 329
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

If I remember correctly, the 2004R is smaller than a 700R4, it is the same size as a TH350.

The downside is most if not all used a BOP bolt pattern, not the Chevy bolt pattern.
Old 12-05-2013, 05:23 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
murphinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you could get a chevy bolt pattern 200/4r in a 83-88 monte carlo ss (I had a few of them back in the day) likely in many other g bodies that had sbc's ( el camino , pontiac 2+2 ,etc...)

200/4r's can be built to take plenty of power they were what grand nationals came with and those guys have the upgrades down to a science , the f bodies got the 700r4's back then which had a uselessy low 1st gear ratio like the 4l60 does
Old 12-05-2013, 05:27 PM
  #6  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 68 Likes on 39 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

I am of the opinion that the 200-4R when built correctly is ultimately stronger than the 700R4. With that being said, I think the 4L80E is an awesome way to go, but if you do not want to cut the floor, then I say 200-4R.
Old 12-05-2013, 05:42 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
t_raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Idaho
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Exeodus
If I remember correctly, the 2004R is smaller than a 700R4, it is the same size as a TH350.

The downside is most if not all used a BOP bolt pattern, not the Chevy bolt pattern.
Most 200-4Rs have a dual bolt pattern housing, BOP and Chevy. I just picked one up I'll be putting in my 79 TA with an Olds 403
Old 12-08-2013, 10:43 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
bldgengineer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kent Island MD
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 200r in my 83 crossfire trans am. Good transmission as long as you don't beat it to hell. Just like the 700r in my 84 C10 it runs and feels right as long as it's adjusted correctly.

If you're keeping the l33 mostly stock I think you'll be more than happy with the 200r. I assume this will be a cruiser? Make sure you keep all the brackets and TV cables associated with the trans and drive her slow until you get it adjusted correctly and you'll love it.

FYI - the guy I bought my c10 from didn't know how to adjust the TV cable correctly and I ended up getting it for close to 1k(swore up and down the trans was bad). 4 hours of careful drive and adjust corrections and she's been breaking loose in "kick down" ever since. Insurance company appraised it at 12k. Love the truck and would never think about getting rid of it lol
Old 12-09-2013, 10:33 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
RedMan*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Spokane Wa.
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cool guys.
Ya I'm seriously looking at the 200r4 for my Bel Air and will probably make the jump this winter.
Next summer I will put in the L-33.
The L-33 is no where close to stock so I know I will have to have a healthy 200r4 trans built for it.
Here is a mock up of my engine:

Engine should be 450-475HP.
Right now I'm leaning towards a Performa Built Trans.
I have sent PM's and unanswered phone calls to other "supporting board members" with no responce.

Thanks

Last edited by RedMan*; 12-09-2013 at 11:03 PM.
Old 07-19-2015, 10:33 AM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (5)
 
tta656's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know this is old...but if you go with a Gn tranny....get one from a vendor on turbobuick.com

They have all that shiznit sorted out in the early 90s before anyone had a clue what a GN could tear up



Quick Reply: 200R4 or 700R4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.