Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

MPG question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 14, 2014 | 05:35 PM
  #1  
ZForce1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default MPG question

I have a question for all those out there with an automatic and 3.23 gears. Since this is an A4 specific thing, I posted it here. What kind of gas mileage have you gotten with 3.23 gears? I used to be able to get 28 mpg on the highway with my 2.73's, but got rid of those a while back. I put in 3.42's, but I do more highway driving now, and since this is and always will be a daily driver/weekend car and never a drag/race car, I would prefer to put in a higher gear. 3.23 doesn't seem like much of a change from 3.42. Considering 3.08 (Yukon sells I believe), but don't know how to program the computer for it afterword. Thanks.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 02:54 AM
  #2  
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Active Streak: 30 Days
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 145
From: Euclid,Ohio
Default

25.5mpg at freeway legal speeds,24.5mpg running with traffic on freeway. Data acquired on 8 trips from Ohio to Florida.

Based on your post,you had 2.73s'(2 series carrier) and you now have 3.42s'(3 series carrier OR 2 series carrier with a spacer OR 3.42 'thick' aftermarket gearset. 3.08s' will ONLY work on a 2 series carrier.

Last edited by FirstYrLS1Z; May 15, 2014 at 04:58 AM.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 06:15 PM
  #3  
ZForce1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

True. I kept the 2 series carrier and got a 3.42 thick gear. Thanks for the MPG info. 3.23's are most likely not worth my effort, but 3.08's might be.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 07:59 PM
  #4  
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Active Streak: 30 Days
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 145
From: Euclid,Ohio
Default

I've accumulated this data over time from posts
for A4
the 3.08 is a guesstimate based on the other data.

2.73-25.9
3.08-24.7
3.23-24.5*
3.42-24.0
3.73-23.0
4.10-22.2
4.56-21.5*

*-my results
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 08:29 PM
  #5  
SteveC's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 876
Likes: 54
From: Poway, Ca. where GOD and the sun always shines
Default

I was getting 23 mpg highway with my 3.23's.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 08:49 PM
  #6  
Carguy8888's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 52
Default

The 3.42s are perfect for me but my milage stinks b/c of an o2 sensor. 70 mph is around 2200 rpms.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 11:31 PM
  #7  
black79transam's Avatar
Launching!
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default

I got 24 on the highway crusing at 72-73mph the other day on my way to Chicago.
Reply
Old May 15, 2014 | 11:52 PM
  #8  
fastbird02's Avatar
Launching!
10 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 261
Likes: 1
From: attleboro, MA
Default

i get about 18mpg combined. 60/40 city/hw
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 05:56 AM
  #9  
forcd ind's Avatar
TECH Veteran
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,187
Likes: 292
From: woodbine, md
Default

kind of my thoughts, are you looking at saving money, reduced noise, or ability to drive further
if saving money, you would have to drive a long way/time to recover what you lay out for gear changes
if your not cam'ed to big, you could possible bring in your lockup earlier with the higher (neu.) rear and maybe reclaim some milage
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 05:43 PM
  #10  
ZForce1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Looking to save on fuel consumption more than anything. Engine is completely stock. 3.42's are just not a very highway friendly gear. Love the throttle response, though. If I can manage to get another car for every day, I'll keep this one as is. It was actually louder on the highway with 2.73 gears. Engine rpm was just at the right place at highway speeds to hit the right frequency and create resonance in there that could be really annoying at times.
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 06:51 PM
  #11  
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Active Streak: 30 Days
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 145
From: Euclid,Ohio
Default

based on your original post of 28mpg with 2.73s,and using 24mpg for 3.42s & 25mpg for 3.08s',every 1000 miles you'd save $6.80 with 3.08 and $24.00 with 2.73 based on a $4.00 per gallon gas cost.
Reply
Old May 16, 2014 | 09:07 PM
  #12  
SteveC's Avatar
TECH Resident
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 876
Likes: 54
From: Poway, Ca. where GOD and the sun always shines
Default

What I do not understand, is why did you purchase a performance vehicle if you are concerned with mpg?

Sara (2001 Z28) has 3.73:1 rearend gears, coupled to a 3000 stall 2.5 str, and I get 18mpg freeway, HOWEVER it is a hoot to drive, she runs like a raped ape.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 PM.