Rookie 4l60e rebuild
#222
Moderator
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The Reverse signal comes in between those two o-rings; therefore you may not get much boost in Reverse, which might cause the reverse clutches to slip.
Did yours not come with that o-ring? Perhaps Sonnax would be kind enough to send you another one.
Did yours not come with that o-ring? Perhaps Sonnax would be kind enough to send you another one.
#223
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![](https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/ls1tech.com-vbulletin/2000x971/20180407_173346_7a520379c97d93e6db4793ef4e86413c4e7926ea.jpg)
#226
Moderator
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I recall one of the pros here stating that a wear-ridge in the boost valve bore could cut the o-rings. So the missing part might have ended up in the pan and they hopefully the filter.
#229
TECH Junkie
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Where do you want to get it done and at what cost? For me, its a cost vs gain comparison. If you're to the point where you're going to break a stock input shaft on a launch, you're going to have a hard time keeping a band and 3/4's in it anyway. It can be done...lots of corvette guys have no other option.
#230
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Where do you want to get it done and at what cost? For me, its a cost vs gain comparison. If you're to the point where you're going to break a stock input shaft on a launch, you're going to have a hard time keeping a band and 3/4's in it anyway. It can be done...lots of corvette guys have no other option.
I don't know what the breaking point is for the stock input and output shafts. I've ran 11.2's with 1.56 60's @122 mph and am probably looking at low 1.5x 60's this season at around 3500 lbs. with me in the car this season.
I won't be adding anymore power so if it's a non issue I won't worry about it but if it's something worth doing I figured what the hell..... depending on cost.
#231
TECH Junkie
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Personally I wouldn't bother anywhere even in your ballpark of power.
Most places typically upgrade output shaft before input shaft also. But I don't think it's any issue for you
Most places typically upgrade output shaft before input shaft also. But I don't think it's any issue for you
#232
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thoughts on the TransGo 3-4 air bleed orifice or just leave the stock check ball in place? I will be drilling the 3rd apply feed hole bigger and car sees 7000 rpms.
#233
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
"I pulled the trans a year later to install a billet output shaft and checked the 3/4 clutch. The clearance had expanded to .110" !!
Granted I made daily WOT 4-2 downshifts which are particularly hard on the clutch.
Checking with Chuck @FLT, he thought that using the Transgo 3/4 "bleed orifice" instead of the stock check-ball capsule was my problem"
#234
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
#235
TECH Junkie
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Blocking the valve could be done with a piece of copper pipe if you wanted (people used to block the 1-2 shift valve on a powerglide this way to avoid automatic upshifts...but that's a topic for another day haha). Just make sure it fits the bore and cut to length. That's all the tight wound spring is doing...being a spacer.
#236
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Installed half the springs in the 3-4 and forward/ overrun spring cages. Why does the forward/ overrun cage need to be so stiff especially considering the forwards are always on when in D
#237
Moderator
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As MaroonMonster said, the output shaft is more likely to break than the input shaft due to the torque multiplication.
IMHO a common and often overlooked failure point is looseness between the input shaft and the input drum. Hence the Sonnax input drum reinforcement ring should be considered essential. IIRC you are doing that anyway.
Glad you found my post about leaving the input drum's check ball.
And blocking the 3-2 downshift valve shouldn't be too hard.
IMHO a common and often overlooked failure point is looseness between the input shaft and the input drum. Hence the Sonnax input drum reinforcement ring should be considered essential. IIRC you are doing that anyway.
Glad you found my post about leaving the input drum's check ball.
And blocking the 3-2 downshift valve shouldn't be too hard.
#239
TECH Junkie
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
New drum with new bushings. I would leave it alone.
My experience shows an incredibly low failure rate with even high mileage oem bushings.
I think there more risk of scoring the bore trying to remove them, or not driving them square when installing them than there is of stock failing.
My experience shows an incredibly low failure rate with even high mileage oem bushings.
I think there more risk of scoring the bore trying to remove them, or not driving them square when installing them than there is of stock failing.
#240
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
New drum with new bushings. I would leave it alone.
My experience shows an incredibly low failure rate with even high mileage oem bushings.
I think there more risk of scoring the bore trying to remove them, or not driving them square when installing them than there is of stock failing.
My experience shows an incredibly low failure rate with even high mileage oem bushings.
I think there more risk of scoring the bore trying to remove them, or not driving them square when installing them than there is of stock failing.
Thanks