Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

60E Using Manual D3 A Lot - Any Excessive Wear??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-03-2024, 08:33 PM
  #1  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
B52bombardier1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Bossier City, Louisiana
Posts: 1,306
Received 211 Likes on 170 Posts
Default 60E Using Manual D3 A Lot - Any Excessive Wear??

Hello,

I have a bone stock 5.3 truck motor and a 4L60E in a 70 El Camino with 2.73 gears in the back. I was advised by my local trans rebuilder five years and 20,000 miles ago that around town below about 45 MPH that I should stay in a manually shifted D3 gear to keep the RPM's up and the load on the 3-4 clutch pack frictions in the 60E down. And then only shift into OD on higher speed roadways such as the Interstate, etc. Since that rebuild, this transmission has been excellent loafing along at about 1800 RPM in D4 OD at 70 MPH sipping gas at 22-23 MPG. The vehicle is most definitely a cruiser that couldn't smoke a tire even if I wanted to.

Can I expect to see excessive wear in the D3 portion of my 4L60E anytime soon due to being in a manual D3 so much? I have a Pontiac Catalina convertible that will very soon have a similar setup.

Rick

Last edited by B52bombardier1; 09-03-2024 at 08:44 PM.
Old 09-03-2024, 09:12 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
 
Full Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Alaska
Posts: 499
Received 201 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Ring n Pinion sets are cheap.
recommend installation of 3.73 gears as a YUGE improvement in driveability, acceleration, and ECONOMY.
The following users liked this post:
B52bombardier1 (09-03-2024)
Old 09-03-2024, 09:16 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
B52bombardier1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Bossier City, Louisiana
Posts: 1,306
Received 211 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

I have thought about a ring and pinion change but I enjoy the fuel economy. And more to the point, I thought that a 3-series gear of that magnitude wouldn't fit inside my ten bolt differential.

Rick
Old 09-03-2024, 09:23 PM
  #4  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
FranksCustomTrans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: BERWICK PA
Posts: 985
Received 618 Likes on 426 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by B52bombardier1
I have thought about a ring and pinion change but I enjoy the fuel economy. And more to the point, I thought that a 3-series gear of that magnitude wouldn't fit inside my ten bolt differential.

Rick
Most certainly will fit and no driving around in D3 won't hurt anything
__________________
Frank formerly of Performabuilt, Now just me, What can I build for you today? Call or message me. Click sig pic for my facebook



Old 09-03-2024, 09:25 PM
  #5  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
FranksCustomTrans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: BERWICK PA
Posts: 985
Received 618 Likes on 426 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by B52bombardier1
I have thought about a ring and pinion change but I enjoy the fuel economy. And more to the point, I thought that a 3-series gear of that magnitude wouldn't fit inside my ten bolt differential.

Rick
Also note while 373 might hurt a bit on the highway they most certainly would help fuel efficiency around town
__________________
Frank formerly of Performabuilt, Now just me, What can I build for you today? Call or message me. Click sig pic for my facebook



Old Yesterday, 07:27 AM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (11)
 
2BFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N.E Missouri
Posts: 930
Received 165 Likes on 136 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by B52bombardier1
That around town below about 45 MPH that I should stay in a manually shifted D3 gear to keep the RPM's up and the load on the 3-4 clutch pack frictions in the 60E down.
The F?
Old Yesterday, 09:53 AM
  #7  
LS1Tech Sponsor
 
FranksCustomTrans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: BERWICK PA
Posts: 985
Received 618 Likes on 426 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2BFAST
The F?
Yes I had same sentiment , Odd and pointless thing to tell someone . On top of that with 2.73 I don't see it going in 4th much below 45 anyway , I know i have 3.08 and mine does not . So not sure of the builder reasoning. Maybe if it was an old 700R4 they used to sometimes go into OD at speeds to low and lug but even then it was usually because TV cable was wrong or converter set up to lock in 4th.
__________________
Frank formerly of Performabuilt, Now just me, What can I build for you today? Call or message me. Click sig pic for my facebook



Old Yesterday, 02:19 PM
  #8  
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
 
RPM WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,343
Likes: 0
Received 1,781 Likes on 1,270 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by B52bombardier1
I have a bone stock 5.3 truck motor and a 4L60E in a 70 El Camino with 2.73 gears in the back....The vehicle is most definitely a cruiser that couldn't smoke a tire even if I wanted to.
Are you certain this engine is running correctly?...such as fuel pressure and A/F ratio? I ask because, even at stock power for a 5.3 (LM7s are like 270-300hp stock, correct?), there should be no issue getting a one-tire-fire going - even with 2.73s (I mean, unless you have a huge M/T ET Drag tire on the rear or something).

My '74 Cutlass has a stock Olds 350-4, it's 200hp with dual exhaust option, 2.56 gears with a TH350 (mild 2.52:1 1st gear, vs. 3.06:1 in your 4L60E), and it's a ~4,000 pound car. The engine hasn't been rebuilt since leaving the assembly plant in April of 1974, but I can still get some tire spin with a 215/70/14 tire out back. You should be making at least 70hp more than my '74, more torque as well, and have much more 1st gear mechanical advantage with 2.73 x 3.06 1st gear.

Beyond that, I will buck the trend here and NOT recommend more gear. If you like the 2.73 fuel economy on the highway then don't change anything with the axle. Instead, consider a higher stall speed torque converter. Even a stock LM7 can benefit from a bump in stall speed. Keep it mild, around 2600-2800rpm, get a top shelf unit (Yank, FTI, etc.) and you'll barely notice it around town unless you stomp on the pedal. On the highway, with lockup it will turn the exact same rpm as it does currently - no loss in MPG.
The following users liked this post:
B52bombardier1 (Yesterday)
Old Yesterday, 06:00 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
 
B52bombardier1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Bossier City, Louisiana
Posts: 1,306
Received 211 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

The engine seems to be running well. No codes, very low STFT and LTFT and 58 PSI at the fuel rail. Plugs are a nice tan color, and all cylinders are at 165-170 PSI for compression. Cold oil pressure is 50 PSI and hot idle oil pressure is 35 PSI. The motor only has 170,000 miles and it had both heads rebuilt 23,000 miles ago. Two Blackstone oil analysis reports indicate very low wear metals and no fuel in the oil. And low silicon . . . good air filtering.

The 4L60E torque converter stall is stock for whatever the donor 1999 GMC Sierra 1500 had - I'm thinking 1800 RPM. The TC also got rebuilt when the transmission got rebuilt. The hottest temperature that I've ever seen in the fluid at the trans cooler was mid-summer here in Louisiana at 190 F.

I must say that I have never tried to smoke a tire in my El Camino. That's what my 2013 six speed manual SS Camaro is all about but even that is a rarity. Teaching my grandson and niece how to drive this manual LS3 Camaro caused more tire smoke than I've caused in years.

All in all, I'm happy with the motor but I will consider a higher stall TC.

Many thanks,

Rick



Quick Reply: 60E Using Manual D3 A Lot - Any Excessive Wear??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:26 AM.