Can someone explain STR to me?
Higher STR=car feels tighter + leaves harder out of the hole=less traction on street tires
for eg. a verter with STR of 2.4 multiplies the torque your engine is supplying by 2.4X
-Jay-
Higher STR=car feels tighter + leaves harder out of the hole=less traction on street tires
for eg. a verter with STR of 2.4 multiplies the torque your engine is supplying by 2.4X
-Jay-
I believe this is all true, except the part about the higher the STR the tighter the converter. There was a recent thread with an explanation of this and I'll see if I can find it. As I recall, it had to do with converter design and tolerances, rather than STR.
Ed
But there has to be a fair comparison. A 3000 stall with a 2.0 STR will definately feel tighter then a 3800 stall with a 2.7 STR due to the far more streetable stall speed. But a 3500 stall with a 2.5 STR will feel tighter (on stock gears) then a 3500 stall with a 2.0 STR.
One key to remember is that as components used to increase stall are used, the STR will also be raised. For example, a 4000/2.4 will be looser on the street than a 3600/2.2 despite the higher STR.
Basically what I am saying is that you are both correct. There are so many factors that play into the feel of the converter that boiling it down to the level I have on Fuddleracing.com may be misleading. I will consider changing the wording or adding an advanced tech section on the site.
Trending Topics
Well put.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Torque x is fantastic from a stop or low rpms, but the torque x runs out fairly quick.
A well designed TC with a lower STR will pick up and roll better from a higher speed, while mine kicks *** from low rpms (mine is a a better 1/4 mile as opposed to running from a highway roll).






