Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Has any one gained MPH with fuddle?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 06:12 AM
  #21  
BlackHawk T/A's Avatar
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,869
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE
Default

Well i'm doing a Yank soon and i'll be able to tell what kind of improvement I get out of it...
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 02:40 AM
  #22  
spec_j's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 1
Default

well i lost.7 seconds off my ET with my 4000 TC from fuddle, and lost 0.3 mph which is you ask me who cares, i dont see what the big deal is about a high trap speed. look at it this way, if you run a 11.9 @ 121 you would be happy right, but from what your saying if you run a 11.7 @ 116 you would me mad? doesnt make sense to me. You got there faster whats the problem with that?

Last edited by spec_j; Jan 28, 2006 at 02:45 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 04:01 AM
  #23  
nwforever's Avatar
12 Second Club
20 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Holland, MI
Default

most people arnt able to cut 1.6 60fts on the street to take advantage of "getting their faster and losing mph"

thats a reason how trap speed can become a factor.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 09:07 AM
  #24  
Ragtop 99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 1
From: Bethesda, MD
Default

Originally Posted by transsam
The idea that a Yank will outperform a Fuddle is kinda funny. I got the best of both worlds with my Fuddle. I consistantly dropped .6 and picked up 1mph.
Looking at results, I see no confirmable evidence that Yank is outrunning Fuddle in any way. Yank seems to say it a lot. But the results we see don't back them up. I dropped ET, gained MPH, AND paid a hell of a lot less. And I am not the only one.

If you want the best of ALL worlds, go Fuddle.
I know that some people running very well with fuddles. But saying you haven't seen Yank perform is unsupported. Comparing a 3400 Yank to a 4000 Fuddle isn't exactly an even match. Compare the 4000 Fuddle to a Yank YTP 4000. Maybe it will be better, but maybe not. In any case, Fuddle users may not post their times but there seems to be a lot of Yanks on this list:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/drag-racing-results/273788-quickest-stock-internals-list-11-82-bump.html

There is plenty of evidence that Yank performs.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 09:10 AM
  #25  
Ragtop 99's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 1
From: Bethesda, MD
Default

Originally Posted by nwforever
most people arnt able to cut 1.6 60fts on the street to take advantage of "getting their faster and losing mph"

thats a reason how trap speed can become a factor.
Yup, same goes for autocross and other road events. And some people want thier car to be fast on the highway. An efficent 4000 stall makes an A4 competitive on the highway.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 01:21 PM
  #26  
mshadow's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 303
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo NY
Default

Originally Posted by spec_j
well i lost.7 seconds off my ET with my 4000 TC from fuddle, and lost 0.3 mph which is you ask me who cares, i dont see what the big deal is about a high trap speed. look at it this way, if you run a 11.9 @ 121 you would be happy right, but from what your saying if you run a 11.7 @ 116 you would me mad? doesnt make sense to me. You got there faster whats the problem with that?
Because my trap speed is decent right now...and some convertor brands show an increase of MPH and a decrease of ET.....I dont have a drag race only car....I do screw around on the street from a roll...and HP im putting to the ground is a big factor.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #27  
mshadow's Avatar
Thread Starter
12 Second Club
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 303
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo NY
Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
Damn that is a great mph tell me more about your car, what mods, DA, any weight reduction for the run
Directflo Lid, New paper airfilter, Janzter ported TB, Hacked up airbox, Cut EGR tube, stock LS1 intake, March underdrive pulley, Pacesetter longtubes, 3inch Duals, 3.73 gears, SFCs, LCAs, minor weight reduction, its a stripper 1998 Formula.

12.2 @ 112 1.83 60` on some ET streets...after tune....

Previously it ran 12.6 @ 110 on nittos with a 1.93 60` before I tuned the car for 3.73s it was wacking the rev limiter for a while on the 2-3shift which is why I think I picked up MPH after the tune.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 01:38 PM
  #28  
chrs1313's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by spec_j
well i lost.7 seconds off my ET with my 4000 TC from fuddle, and lost 0.3 mph which is you ask me who cares, i dont see what the big deal is about a high trap speed. look at it this way, if you run a 11.9 @ 121 you would be happy right, but from what your saying if you run a 11.7 @ 116 you would me mad? doesnt make sense to me. You got there faster whats the problem with that?
I hope you are seriously joking about this comment, obviously if it is the same car and the same stall/str i will take 121 over 116 anyday, mph is how much hp you are making, that is 50 less hp by putting a converter in, it really doesn't even make sense. Obviously if someone has a turbo on their car and they run a 12.5 at 120 mph they are really losing tractions because the hp is not being put to the ground. If i run 12.00 at 113mph with a 1.6 60 ft yeah i am faster with a lower mph but all the turbo car has to do is get it to the ground and it is a low 11 sec or high 10 sec car. The more mph the more hp the car has so why would you want less So if both 60's are the same for 11.9 @121 and 11.7 at 116 lets see who wins. Bottom line you want to get the lowest 60ft while getting the highest mph from a converter IF this wasn't true you wouldn't even hear the term Efficiency

I am not saying fuddle is not a good converter, just arguing the point of mph
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 01:41 PM
  #29  
chrs1313's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by mshadow
Directflo Lid, New paper airfilter, Janzter ported TB, Hacked up airbox, Cut EGR tube, stock LS1 intake, March underdrive pulley, Pacesetter longtubes, 3inch Duals, 3.73 gears, SFCs, LCAs, minor weight reduction, its a stripper 1998 Formula.

12.2 @ 112 1.83 60` on some ET streets...after tune....

Previously it ran 12.6 @ 110 on nittos with a 1.93 60` before I tuned the car for 3.73s it was wacking the rev limiter for a while on the 2-3shift which is why I think I picked up MPH after the tune.

what raceweight are you at and get an LS6 intake on that biach...will give at least 1 more mph if not more
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #30  
ChevyZ28Thunder's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: Broken Arrow, Ok
Default

I had a 3500 TCI and ran 12.10@112 with a 1.71 60'. Sent the stall to TCI and made it a 4000. It ran 11.71@115 with a 1.58 60'.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 11:30 PM
  #31  
gator's 99TA's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,971
Likes: 2
From: Tampa Bay
Default

call up each company and talk to them about your goals. IMO for the cars in this thread 10 seconds and slower) there isnt a big difference b/w yank and fuddle. go with who you are most comfortable with.

i made a post about my fuddle experience. i had a yank in the car. this is my 10 second 3500 lbs drag radial car with stock heads and a small nitrous shot. i am happy. enough said.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 01:57 AM
  #32  
ChevyZ28Thunder's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: Broken Arrow, Ok
Default

Originally Posted by gator's 99TA
call up each company and talk to them about your goals. IMO for the cars in this thread 10 seconds and slower) there isnt a big difference b/w yank and fuddle. go with who you are most comfortable with.

i made a post about my fuddle experience. i had a yank in the car. this is my 10 second 3500 lbs drag radial car with stock heads and a small nitrous shot. i am happy. enough said.

Very true.. 3700 lbs cam only car here (ran 11.88 on stock fronts and ET Streets). Do your research and buy the stall that is aimed at your goals.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 05:29 AM
  #33  
Automatics's Avatar
Restricted User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Default

How many of you have had a "street race" that where you got beat off the line (lost traction) and past them up on the big end. I have done this, and if you had a torque converter that had a lot of slip (less mph) you would not be able to catch him on the big end. This is one of the best feelings you can get is when you catch them on the big end. Torque converter efficiency is not to be taken lightly. MPH tells you how good the engine was built, at the least.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 09:25 AM
  #34  
seadoo's Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 960
Likes: 1
From: Central, FL
Default

Originally Posted by spec_j
well i lost.7 seconds off my ET with my 4000 TC from fuddle, and lost 0.3 mph which is you ask me who cares, i dont see what the big deal is about a high trap speed. look at it this way, if you run a 11.9 @ 121 you would be happy right, but from what your saying if you run a 11.7 @ 116 you would me mad? doesnt make sense to me. You got there faster whats the problem with that?
actually you gained about 0.3 mph with my shitty trans tune and the converter was unlocked the whole time.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 01:34 AM
  #35  
spec_j's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by chrs1313
I hope you are seriously joking about this comment, obviously if it is the same car and the same stall/str i will take 121 over 116 anyday, mph is how much hp you are making, that is 50 less hp by putting a converter in, it really doesn't even make sense. Obviously if someone has a turbo on their car and they run a 12.5 at 120 mph they are really losing tractions because the hp is not being put to the ground. If i run 12.00 at 113mph with a 1.6 60 ft yeah i am faster with a lower mph but all the turbo car has to do is get it to the ground and it is a low 11 sec or high 10 sec car. The more mph the more hp the car has so why would you want less So if both 60's are the same for 11.9 @121 and 11.7 at 116 lets see who wins. Bottom line you want to get the lowest 60ft while getting the highest mph from a converter IF this wasn't true you wouldn't even hear the term Efficiency

I am not saying fuddle is not a good converter, just arguing the point of mph
since when did we add a turbo to this car? your going way outta the picture there. Bottom line is get what you want, we all have seen the gains from it, and im sure there is always someone that is going to take what another person post and bash it, so like i said, get what you feel you are goign to be happy with
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 01:35 AM
  #36  
spec_j's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 501
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by seadoo
actually you gained about 0.3 mph with my shitty trans tune and the converter was unlocked the whole time.
oops ment to say i gained lol
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 11:53 AM
  #37  
JaSSon's Avatar
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
From: Bridge City, TX
Default

Ill put my PT4000 up against any brand 4000 verter any day. I promise Ill out e.t. and out mph a car with same mods and same weight.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 PM.