Vig3600 vs. YTP4400
Re: Vig3600 vs. YTP4400 Paul IMO the 5.3 heads r making more power than your older S2's.
But u cant tell me that if u took the SOLID out it would make more HP with a TR224?If so that would be amazing.Can u elaborate alittle?
I do admit in terms of a solid its small.
In terms of a LS1 camshaft its BIG.
I wast picking a fight with u Paul.Just picking your brain more or less.I respect TR and if I chose ot go with anyone elses stuff it would be u guys.I really like your approach.Your honest guys and really treat people like family.
We will do buisiness again some time.
Good luck with the new setup.
JS
AtoZ Performance
But u cant tell me that if u took the SOLID out it would make more HP with a TR224?If so that would be amazing.Can u elaborate alittle?
I do admit in terms of a solid its small.
In terms of a LS1 camshaft its BIG.
I wast picking a fight with u Paul.Just picking your brain more or less.I respect TR and if I chose ot go with anyone elses stuff it would be u guys.I really like your approach.Your honest guys and really treat people like family.
We will do buisiness again some time.
Good luck with the new setup.
JS
AtoZ Performance
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
From: Katy, TX
Re: Vig3600 vs. YTP4400 </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by 98TAauto:
<strong>again ill say, yes the top bolt on guys run the yanks, but did they have the vig 3600 or just the vig3200 before switching to the 4400?? I havent seen any former 3600 owners post there et's after switching from the 3600 to a 4400??? I just wanna see some times from the switch with same bolt ons and almost the same weather <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> im sure yanks better, but i dont see where the blow the vigs outta the water yet <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I ran a string of 11.8x ets one weekend on one of those phenominally low DA days we have at HRP with my vig 3600.
I came back a week later with my yank TP4400, about 40lbs heavier raceweight. With a DA that was significantly worse, and ran off a string of 11.4x et's.
Came back the next week with my raceweight back down. a little better weather but not phenominal, and ran a 11.2x et
<strong>again ill say, yes the top bolt on guys run the yanks, but did they have the vig 3600 or just the vig3200 before switching to the 4400?? I havent seen any former 3600 owners post there et's after switching from the 3600 to a 4400??? I just wanna see some times from the switch with same bolt ons and almost the same weather <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="gr_images/icons/wink.gif" /> im sure yanks better, but i dont see where the blow the vigs outta the water yet <img border="0" title="" alt="[Razz]" src="gr_tounge.gif" /> </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I ran a string of 11.8x ets one weekend on one of those phenominally low DA days we have at HRP with my vig 3600.
I came back a week later with my yank TP4400, about 40lbs heavier raceweight. With a DA that was significantly worse, and ran off a string of 11.4x et's.
Came back the next week with my raceweight back down. a little better weather but not phenominal, and ran a 11.2x et
Re: Vig3600 vs. YTP4400 </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by JS:
<strong>Paul IMO the 5.3 heads r making more power than your older S2's.
But u cant tell me that if u took the SOLID out it would make more HP with a TR224?If so that would be amazing.Can u elaborate alittle?
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm running 5.3 heads as well. Yes I do think with a TR224 it would make close to the same power. I'm not going to try that since I'm staying solid roller. We are fixin' to get much more aggressive with the solid cam though. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Later....
<strong>Paul IMO the 5.3 heads r making more power than your older S2's.
But u cant tell me that if u took the SOLID out it would make more HP with a TR224?If so that would be amazing.Can u elaborate alittle?
</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm running 5.3 heads as well. Yes I do think with a TR224 it would make close to the same power. I'm not going to try that since I'm staying solid roller. We are fixin' to get much more aggressive with the solid cam though. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" />
Later....
Re: Vig3600 vs. YTP4400 Cool.....
Cant wait to see the results.
U guys were one of the first to try a solid and I've alsways liked the idea of a solid.
Good luck.
JS
<small>[ May 27, 2002, 11:15 AM: Message edited by: JS ]</small>
Cant wait to see the results.
U guys were one of the first to try a solid and I've alsways liked the idea of a solid.
Good luck.
JS
<small>[ May 27, 2002, 11:15 AM: Message edited by: JS ]</small>
D(irecto)r Pepper
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 0
From: Houston Raceway Park...in TEXAS.
Re: Vig3600 vs. YTP4400 </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by PaiN:
<strong> ran a string of 11.8x ets one weekend on one of those phenominally low DA days we have at HRP with my vig 3600.
I came back a week later with my yank TP4400, about 40lbs heavier raceweight. With a DA that was significantly worse, and ran off a string of 11.4x et's.
Came back the next week with my raceweight back down. a little better weather but not phenominal, and ran a 11.2x et</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Y'all need more proof?
Test them your selves. Look at a cross section of our cars using these verters. There is a reason the Yanks are on top.
They are BETTER.
I am still looking for that 1.3 60' from a 3600 (4400) Vigilante. Anyone?
Raugh
<strong> ran a string of 11.8x ets one weekend on one of those phenominally low DA days we have at HRP with my vig 3600.
I came back a week later with my yank TP4400, about 40lbs heavier raceweight. With a DA that was significantly worse, and ran off a string of 11.4x et's.
Came back the next week with my raceweight back down. a little better weather but not phenominal, and ran a 11.2x et</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Y'all need more proof?
Test them your selves. Look at a cross section of our cars using these verters. There is a reason the Yanks are on top.
They are BETTER.
I am still looking for that 1.3 60' from a 3600 (4400) Vigilante. Anyone?
Raugh
TECH Apprentice
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland Area
Re: Vig3600 vs. YTP4400 </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Raughammer:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by PaiN:
<strong> ran a string of 11.8x ets one weekend on one of those phenominally low DA days we have at HRP with my vig 3600.
I came back a week later with my yank TP4400, about 40lbs heavier raceweight. With a DA that was significantly worse, and ran off a string of 11.4x et's.
Came back the next week with my raceweight back down. a little better weather but not phenominal, and ran a 11.2x et</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Y'all need more proof?
Test them your selves. Look at a cross section of our cars using these verters. There is a reason the Yanks are on top.
They are BETTER.
I am still looking for that 1.3 60' from a 3600 (4400) Vigilante. Anyone?
Raugh</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Nope. No more proof needed. Yank rules the track with its efficient converter. However you'll never convince me that there is a better verter for my car than what I have now. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Drives tighter than a virgin on prom night and can deliver plenty of performance.
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by PaiN:
<strong> ran a string of 11.8x ets one weekend on one of those phenominally low DA days we have at HRP with my vig 3600.
I came back a week later with my yank TP4400, about 40lbs heavier raceweight. With a DA that was significantly worse, and ran off a string of 11.4x et's.
Came back the next week with my raceweight back down. a little better weather but not phenominal, and ran a 11.2x et</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Y'all need more proof?
Test them your selves. Look at a cross section of our cars using these verters. There is a reason the Yanks are on top.
They are BETTER.
I am still looking for that 1.3 60' from a 3600 (4400) Vigilante. Anyone?
Raugh</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Nope. No more proof needed. Yank rules the track with its efficient converter. However you'll never convince me that there is a better verter for my car than what I have now. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Smile]" src="gr_stretch.gif" /> Drives tighter than a virgin on prom night and can deliver plenty of performance.
