converter efficiency
At what RPM and in what gear was the 90% measured at?
What rear gear ratio are you running?
John
at the point the car stops pulling (this is the point power transfer is stable) that will yield the best result without a converter dyno
to test it in high gear you must run a lot of rear end ratio, more is better -- 4.88 up
so I need to look at my log right at the top of 2nd before it shifts into 3rd and calculate... what is the gear ratio of 2nd that I need to use in my equation? i'm running a built 60E with stock gear ratios.
thanks
BTW, Yank, I sent y'all a message on your website before I posted here.

also something I had added.... (on highway)in 4th and locked up, with load on the car (increasing throttle % but trying not to unlock the converter) it has a violent shudder/shake. what could be the cause of this? it's usually around 70-80mph and it doesnt "seem" to happen in drive.
Trending Topics

also something I had added.... (on highway)in 4th and locked up, with load on the car (increasing throttle % but trying not to unlock the converter) it has a violent shudder/shake. what could be the cause of this? it's usually around 70-80mph and it doesnt "seem" to happen in drive.
John
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
at the point the car stops pulling (this is the point power transfer is stable) that will yield the best result without a converter dyno
to test it in high gear you must run a lot of rear end ratio, more is better -- 4.88 up
Mike - I thought you were suppose to check TC efficiency in your 1:1 gear. There is no question that TC efficiency would be better at 6000rpm in 2nd gear than it would be at 6000 rpm in 3rd gear because of gearing advantage.
John
I was wondering if my lockup clutch is starting to wear out. Yank, does that sound like a reasonable explanation for my highway driving?
In high gear at WOT you have other things that will change the shape of the converter eff. slope from car to car (wind drag,tire tread, brake drag, temp and other factors due to speed )
when you clutch is locked you will see little to no slip or 100% input to output power.
The converter is a torque meter so if you are working it in a high torque RPM range it has to work harder, like 4600 to 5400 RPM after 5600 or so (depends on cam) the torque is on the down slope so the work load is reduced and eff. will rise, that is why Drag cars over gear so at the finish line they get the most out of the engine, converter and they are on max revs and see high eff. #'s from small very high stall converters like 7" and 8" models
also note that any slip to drop back RPM will give you some extra boost from a little remaining STR
parts will and do get used up in time and use will change the internal clearances so check ups are a good idea if you have a concern
John
Does the new transmission have a shift kit?
done multiplying torque. Can't say about the Yank piece's
particulars. If you have any torque multiplication going on
then pure slip-based calculations aren't telling the whole
efficiency story. I know my 3500 has not reached peak by
6000RPM. A high stall speed converter wants a high shift
point, if the rest of the setup is up to it.
i have my shift points at 6100 for each shift. ive done alot of the tuning myself. the STR is about 2.5 from what Yank has told me before. my valvetrain is upgraded minus the pushrods. but no problems on those ever since ive had the car.
I can find a way to post my HPT log if it would help discern anything
http://www.tciauto.com/tech_info/calculators.htm#4
but i also read that you can use a mph calculator and then divide your actual mph/theoretical mph and that ratio is your converter efficiency.
http://www.tciauto.com/tech_info/calculators.htm#4
but i also read that you can use a mph calculator and then divide your actual mph/theoretical mph and that ratio is your converter efficiency.
Neat calculator.
I have measured the torque converter efficiency by dividing the
Transmission Input Shaft RPM by the Engine RPM at WOT during a ¼ mile run.
1st gear (3.06:1) will show the best efficiency, 2nd gear (1.63:1) the
efficiency will be lower and 3rd gear (1:1) will be the lowest. You can use most scan tools to monitor these engine parameters.
John


