how efficient is the th400 compared to the 4l60?
i have no proof, no evidence, i just remember a few months ago, i guy came in here that went from an M6 to a TH400 and lost 90rwhp. granted that was from an M6 and i think he had a heads and cam package, but you'll see a significant drop in horsepower to the wheels.
at the track i will take a th400 over a 6 speed in nearly every case. booth et and mph
I can not see how an overdrive transmission can weigh less than a 3 speed, even a TH400.
The ODs case is longer, and there are more parts inside it with the overdrive so the "TH400 weighs more" is not a valid arguement IMO.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
at the track i will take a th400 over a 6 speed in nearly every case. booth et and mph
FWIW.... I only "lost" 20 rwhp/24rwtq going from an M6 to TH400 w/a steel DS, 4.56's in a 12 bolt on 28" slicks. Not too bad afaik. Granted, this is a LU trans/verter, but still. I can't imagine losing 90 rwhp going from the M6 to A3, but I guess anything's possible under the right conditions-
FWIW.... I only "lost" 20 rwhp/24rwtq going from an M6 to TH400 w/a steel DS, 4.56's in a 12 bolt on 28" slicks. Not too bad afaik. Granted, this is a LU trans/verter, but still. I can't imagine losing 90 rwhp going from the M6 to A3, but I guess anything's possible under the right conditions-
if you dyno it unlocked it would change your numbers alot
I can not see how an overdrive transmission can weigh less than a 3 speed, even a TH400.
The ODs case is longer, and there are more parts inside it with the overdrive so the "TH400 weighs more" is not a valid arguement IMO.
Again, I haven't yet dyno'd unlocked, but "thought" it was a valid comparison as the M6 was also a 1 to 1 mechanical link. Trying to compare apples to oranges the most logical way possible to see how the A3 compared to the M6 as far as actual rw power efficiency. I guess my logic was AWOL-
Jim
A 90rwhp loss seems a bit much for just a H/C car. If it were making over 700rwhp I could see that but not for something in the 400rwhp range. I'm willing to bet it had a loose inefficient converter...been there done that.
And I still think the 60E is heavier than a TH400.
Someone PLEASE weigh them on an accurate scale dry with no TC so we can find out once and for all the truth.
I would do this myself but even though I have access to the scales I don't have both transmissions side by side to get the answer.
All I have seen is Fedex freight said this or ABF said that or "it just feels heavier"
I have pulled a 60E twice and installed the TH400 in my car and in my opinion the TH400 "felt" lighter.
I have no problem saying I am wrong if I am wrong but so far no one has any concrete evidence.
Even if the TH400 is heavier I would be very curious to see exactly how much.
Sorry for the rant and no I don't know why this bugs me so much.
if you dyno it unlocked it would change your numbers alot".....
thx
Dyno's number bragging is for people with slow cars.










