how efficient is the th400 compared to the 4l60?
9 Second Club
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JL ws-6
th350 parts are a little lighter, but to build one to take the same power as a th400 will not be cheap. If you already have a th400, I wouldnt' bother unless you are tryignto get every last .1 out of the car.. because realisticially, that's about what you are talking about getting.
BY gettinga custom made converter to your car (not sure what you are running now) you'd stand to probably gain more then swapping to a th350
BY gettinga custom made converter to your car (not sure what you are running now) you'd stand to probably gain more then swapping to a th350
still got alot in the car....looking for a low-mid 10's N/A ....
if th350 will pull 0.1 that would be great
thx alot..
Last edited by TNTaddict; Dec 17, 2006 at 05:15 PM.
Had: stock 3.23 rearend, 26" slicks, aluminum DS, built 4l60e , 4000K stall, 1800' DA, ran 11.4 at 119mph with 1.60 sixty.
Have: 12 bolt with 4.10's, 28" slicks, steel DS, TH400, 4800 stall, 2500' DA, ran 10.9 at 125mph with 1.60 sixty.
I'll take a TH400 over the 4l60e any day. I don't even care about the dyno numbers, the track is what you need to use for the real test...
Dan
Have: 12 bolt with 4.10's, 28" slicks, steel DS, TH400, 4800 stall, 2500' DA, ran 10.9 at 125mph with 1.60 sixty.
I'll take a TH400 over the 4l60e any day. I don't even care about the dyno numbers, the track is what you need to use for the real test...
Dan
Originally Posted by DanZ28
Had: stock 3.23 rearend, 26" slicks, aluminum DS, built 4l60e , 4000K stall, 1800' DA, ran 11.4 at 119mph with 1.60 sixty.
Have: 12 bolt with 4.10's, 28" slicks, steel DS, TH400, 4800 stall, 2500' DA, ran 10.9 at 125mph with 1.60 sixty.
I'll take a TH400 over the 4l60e any day. I don't even care about the dyno numbers, the track is what you need to use for the real test...
Dan
Have: 12 bolt with 4.10's, 28" slicks, steel DS, TH400, 4800 stall, 2500' DA, ran 10.9 at 125mph with 1.60 sixty.
I'll take a TH400 over the 4l60e any day. I don't even care about the dyno numbers, the track is what you need to use for the real test...
Dan
9 Second Club
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DanZ28
Had: stock 3.23 rearend, 26" slicks, aluminum DS, built 4l60e , 4000K stall, 1800' DA, ran 11.4 at 119mph with 1.60 sixty.
Have: 12 bolt with 4.10's, 28" slicks, steel DS, TH400, 4800 stall, 2500' DA, ran 10.9 at 125mph with 1.60 sixty.
I'll take a TH400 over the 4l60e any day. I don't even care about the dyno numbers, the track is what you need to use for the real test...
Dan
Have: 12 bolt with 4.10's, 28" slicks, steel DS, TH400, 4800 stall, 2500' DA, ran 10.9 at 125mph with 1.60 sixty.
I'll take a TH400 over the 4l60e any day. I don't even care about the dyno numbers, the track is what you need to use for the real test...
Dan
thanks DanZ28.....
Originally Posted by ls1408cp
I did it with the numbers in your sig. You woulds have to be 3900lbs. Are you just guessing?
I don't use front runners at the track either, stock 17x9" wheels.
Originally Posted by SuperZ
wow thats awesome.Did you add power to the car also when the th400 was in there
With the same setup I have now except I had an M6, a smaller cam (about 10-15 less peak whp), 26" slicks, 2500' DA, about 100# heavier, I ran 11.7 at 120mph 1.70 sixty. Just thought I would throw that in there too.
Dan
