What flexplate feedback needed??
GOOD LUCK!
If you need more info feel free to pm.
GOOD LUCK!
If you need more info feel free to pm.
You are right about the incompatability with 4l80e converter. I spent too much time researching this crap haha. Glad to save anyone time. I would find the part number for stock flexplate bolts on trucks and vans and compare and order them off of a gmparts site of somesort. (I did that for stock bellhousing bolts that havent came in yet.)
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
All I need for the install now is a trans cooler... just waiting on the tax refund
Flexplates are .035" thicker than stock and the starter ring is welded to both sides of the flexplate for additional strength. Constructed from a high tensile strength material these flexplates resist elongation and cracking. All 168 tooth flexplates have dual GM bolt patterns and are sized for stock 3/8" mounting bolts and can be easily drilled for 7/16" diameter high performance torque converter applications and are SFI 29.1 approved.
I think they are just as any other flexplate...id go for it imo. Like i said i didnt notice anything unusual everything seemed tight.
That notice from TCI doesn't make sense and it is confusing. I am trying to convince myself that the TCI hole size is OK...........................
If you spin the converter clockwise(looking at the back of the engine) before tightening the bolts, the edge of the hole will already be in contact with the side of the bolt, so there is no room for any lateral slippage. No matter what hole size/ bolt size there will only be a single point contact here anyway.
The larger hole only affects the amount of contact area for transmission of the clamping force to the bolt head. As long as the bolt flange is strong enough to take more clamping pressure on one side than the other, as the other side will be more over the hole. The major force vector on the bolts will be lateral engine torque(shear) anyway.
Bolt head area(factory bolts) = 277.45mm^2
Hole area including bevel = 153.85mm^2
Area for clamping = 124mm^2.= about the same as the end of a 1/2" rod. Which is a little greater than the cross-sectional area of the 10mm bolt. The clamping force will always be the same, but the force/mm^2 will be greater with a larger hole. A smaller, precisely centered hole could yield up to 33% more clamping area with the flange. With strong enough bolts it shouldn't matter though. Hopefully, I am correct.

Last edited by DrX; Mar 27, 2008 at 09:36 AM.


