Official - GM Starving Pontiac to Death, Ditching Saab, Saturn and HUMMER
#41
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I agree with Tony's line up and have said several times in the recent past that is what should happen. Bring the G8 to Chevrolet and get rid of the stupid alpha-numeric name. That is an Impala-Grand Prix-Cutlass-Skylark-Gran Sport-Biscayne-Caprice-Tempest-Chevelle........just pick one of the big car names from the past and use it.
The Sky should come to Chevrolet as the new Monza or Vega
.
The Sky should come to Chevrolet as the new Monza or Vega
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
#43
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i agree that GMC should stay but in LIMITED models. Sierra/Denali and Acadia. Only GMC truck i'd own is the Denali and the Acadia's are NICE and see ALOT of them on the road. Sky should come over as a Chevy model and so should the G8. It'll be an interesting few years when this all starts to happen
Since Pontiac will be starved to death i bet we'll see a Buick Trans Am WS6 before long
![Sad](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_sad.gif)
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
#44
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The Astra seems like a pretty cool small car, I bet it handles quite well for a basic FWD coupe/sedan.
I love the Aura, great mid size family sedan and good looking car but fortunately the similar Malibu will live on to keep that line going.
I am concerned what will happen to the Saturn/Sky line seeing as both Saturn and Pontiac are going away. Those are great little sports cars (I prefer the looks of the Sky as well btw but I still love both), it'd be a shame to see them both go.![Nono](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/nono.gif)
I love the Aura, great mid size family sedan and good looking car but fortunately the similar Malibu will live on to keep that line going.
I am concerned what will happen to the Saturn/Sky line seeing as both Saturn and Pontiac are going away. Those are great little sports cars (I prefer the looks of the Sky as well btw but I still love both), it'd be a shame to see them both go.
![Nono](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/nono.gif)
I agree with the Malibu surviving at the expense of the Aura. There is so much redundancy in the GM stable that I overlook some of the more obvious ones...
![Nono](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/nono.gif)
#45
#46
TECH Addict
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Webb City, MO...out in the garage
Posts: 2,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Seriously guys, some of you would say scrap GMC over Chevrolet? No offense, but the last 10 years the GMC trucks looked a lot better than the Chevys, and sold better too. Yes we all know they are the same truck, except for front end, rear end, and some slight interior upgrades. But generally, they always looked better. Especially the few times Chevy decided to change the front end/grill on the Silverado, many people disliked it and bought the GMC. Plus look at the Sierra Denali with quadrasteer, very tasteful mods, motor upgrade. If you've owned both in the last 10 years, you know what I am talking about.
Resolution: Keep Sierra truck, Denali, even new Acadia, scrap every other model.
Hands down, the new 2009 Sierra Denali crew cab is the Best looking, driving, performing pickup out there.
Resolution: Keep Sierra truck, Denali, even new Acadia, scrap every other model.
Hands down, the new 2009 Sierra Denali crew cab is the Best looking, driving, performing pickup out there.
that's about how i feel. our '98 Silverado hasn't lost its appeal to me, but for 99+ models, i'll take the GMC
![Nod](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_nod.gif)
#47
#48
TECH Senior Member
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. Inside and out, I just like the Bonneville's look better. Again, that's with the as-is G8 sedan. Appearance wise, had Pontiac come up with a 2-door version of the G8 that retained all other styling cues (other than the extra 2 doors), I'm sure I would have liked it better than a '04-'05 GXP Bonneville. As for interior, I've sat in both and I actually prefer the Bonneville interior. I was not really impressed at all with the interior of the G8 GT that I sat in at the '08 NAIAS.
No arguement here. I would have loved to see the Bonneville built on a nice, longer [than the G8] RWD structure with an LS1/LS2 under the hood (since no LS3 was available in '04-'05). I just really liked the long, full-sized appearance of the car, which is correct for a luxury sedan. And IMO, the only cars (not counting SUVs) that should have 4 doors are luxury cars or econo-boxes.
To me a "long, full sized appearance" usually means a boring, overweight car. Long front overhangs are an absolute appearance nightmare, which the Bonneville seems to suffer from. Example, look at the nasty front overhang on the DTS compared to the overhang on the CTS.
![](https://us.autos1.yimg.com/img.autos.yahoo.com/izp/cadillac_dts_luxuryi_2009_exterior_sideview_640x480.jpg)
![](https://image.motortrend.com/f/9498315/112_0709_09z+2008_cadillac_CTS+side_view.jpg)
More often than not the typical 90s and older "long, full sized" American sedan has lots of wasted space that could have been trimmed down for weight savings and better aerodynamics.
This is where our disconnect is. I really don't want to look behind me and see a large back seat, two more doors, and/or lots of trunk space when driving a sport/performance car. Those are all things that I like to see in a luxury sedan. Usually, all those considerations (rear seats, cargo space, etc.) cause for some compromise in styling.
I'll bet that if the G8 was designed as a coupe, the look that you already love would be even more aggressive and plain badass. Just think about a 1970 Chevelle hardtop coupe vs a 1970 Malibu 4-door. Generally, they are the same car.... but the coupe looks soooooooo much better.
![Winky](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_wink.gif)
My view is this: If you want a muscle/performance car, then things like a spacious back seat and large trunk are likely not top on your list of concerns.....styling and performance likely is though.
This is why I'd like to see a coupe version. People wanting a 4-door luxury car that also moves should in fact be looking at (and likely would be looking at) something from Cadillac, like the CTS-V, or STS-V.
#49
LS1Tech Administrator
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Schiller Park, IL Member: #317
Posts: 32,312
Likes: 0
Received 1,740 Likes
on
1,247 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You are definitely part of the minority then. While the Bonneville's interior is functional it's painful to look at, it makes you feel like you are in a rental car from the 80s. The G8's interior on the other hand makes you feel like you are at least driving something worth while.
Thank you (seriously).
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
Your looking at it wrong. Its a luxury/sports sedan first, a muscle car/performance car second. This is no way is trying to replace the typical two door performance coupe, but rather its just another class of vehicle. And rightfully so the styling should be compared to other cars of its class (other sports sedans, not coupes). Think of it like a cheaper CTS with a V8.
How? The A-body cars of the '60s/'70s were all the exact same cars under the skin, other than the fact that you could have 2 or 4 doors. These were mid-sized cars in their day (just like the G8 is today). The coupes always looked better (opinion yes, but nearly ANYONE would agree with this). So I think it's safe (and fair) to say that a G8 coupe based on the same general style of the sedan pictured in this thread, would look better.
Agreed. But again you are looking at it wrong. This car is in no way trying to replace the 2 door coupe in your garage, but rather its providing a great comfortable daily driver without compromising performance. While their performance might be similar, they should not be compared because they are of a different class. This car is for someone looking for a 4 door sports sedan, not a 2 door coupe.
Not at all. It's a Cadillac, and although Cadillac used to offer a wide range of 2-door cars, they've never had a primary image of sport or performance....but rather luxury. Just so happens that they're now adding some ***** to the luxury. Pontiac on the other hand was supposed to have more of a "performance" image, or at least GM has stated this in the past. I just think that the Pontiac brand would be better served by having a world class, aggressive appearing and category leading performance car with a 2 door option. Solstice does not fit that description at all, IMO.
Last edited by RPM WS6; 01-15-2009 at 06:23 PM.
#50
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I remember my dad always telling me back in 2002 that Pontiac wont live another 10 years. Guess he was right. ![Sad](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_sad.gif)
Their marketting has always sucked for just about any brand. The brands that are moved the most are the ones that are advertised the most. Anyone outside of the car world would have no idea what a G8 is. Same could be said with the modern GTO, but even badging it a GTO was a mistake in the first place and lack of options was a poor mistake.
I honestly don't see GM living past 10 years from now if they keep going in the direction they are going. Funny thing is that everything people bitch and moan about the similarities about the Pontiacs with the nose and that is happening with the Chevy lineup, but apparently it is totally different.
If you want to see what a Chevy G8 will look like, you probably don't have to look much further than the front and rear end of a Malibu. Instead of the grill being verticle it is going to be horizontal.
Also for the record, I would so rock a Bonnie GXP just like you RPM WS6.
Don't know what it is but the car has always kind of appealed to me. Even if it has a "rental" car type of interior, which I would guess that comes down to any car with some sort of leather or vinyl layers on it.
![Sad](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_sad.gif)
Their marketting has always sucked for just about any brand. The brands that are moved the most are the ones that are advertised the most. Anyone outside of the car world would have no idea what a G8 is. Same could be said with the modern GTO, but even badging it a GTO was a mistake in the first place and lack of options was a poor mistake.
I honestly don't see GM living past 10 years from now if they keep going in the direction they are going. Funny thing is that everything people bitch and moan about the similarities about the Pontiacs with the nose and that is happening with the Chevy lineup, but apparently it is totally different.
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
Also for the record, I would so rock a Bonnie GXP just like you RPM WS6.
![The Pimp](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_pimp.gif)
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
#52
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
damn thats sexy. I don't understand people hating on the g8s. They are a great car inside and out, their only problem being lack of movement sales wise. Part of that may be their pricing, but quality isn't cheap.
#53
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The problem is it's too late. There's been too long of a pattern of mediocre offerings for people to jump right back into bed with the Big 3. It's gonna take time.