Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Where are you going now?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2009, 04:14 AM
  #41  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
evilZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fspeedster
You sir need an *** kick, what have you done for our country lately? If you guys think that buying foreign goods don't harm our economy that you'r just plain stupid. I think people like you is part of the reason why our country is in bad shape, people who just don't give a damm!!!
I'm in the air force. I was Iraq when my daughter was born, and still three months later when she was killed in a car accident along with my Mom and Wife. I'm not blaming the contry, im just saying i dont think i needed to be there since i spent the whole time playing x box and eating pizza, under air conditioning. And im saying i made some pretty big sacrifices for this great country. Oh yea, and then they wouldnt give me my GI bill, the reason i joined. Awesome. So what have you done?

buying foreign goods is as good as buying domestic goods, they all pay fees to do business here. Do you think the GOVT is going to allow all business to go overseas without making sure they get a peice of the profit? And besiudes all that, we're not talking about such a general term as goods, we're talking cars



Originally Posted by LS1LT1
That car is hot.
But I'm telling ya, the G8 GXP comes somewhat close and is a lot less expensive than that HSV 427 would be if it were available here.
Im at least doing the body work, im going to try and track down the seats and interior. But im already seeing money signs lol. I called HSV and asked if they could pluck a g8 base v6 from the line and modify it for me and send it over. They said theyll check into some regulations and call back. Finger's are crossed!
Old 02-25-2009, 10:06 AM
  #42  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
TT632's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Any dragstrip any time
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
I guess they got better after '84, cuz my dad's '87 Accord gave him 235k trouble-free miles (two timing belts and a clutch), my uncle's '88 Legend is at 250k (last I checked) with two timing belts and a clutch, my mom's '91 Legend gave her 245k trouble free miles, I BOUGHT my '94 Integra with 134k miles and sold it with 193k running like a top (timing belt/clutch/igniter), and my sister's '99 TL had to have the transmission replaced @ 95k miles but it was 100% covered by Acura (TSB I believe). Otherwise, the TL was a fantastic car. Compare that to my mom's old '94 Corvette; as much as I loved that car, it was cheaply made and the Optispark blew chunks. And the 4L60-E went out COMPLETELY @ 114k miles. That being said, I still plan on buying an LT4 Corvette sometime in the near future because I love C4s. And the '96 Taurus that my grandmom bought and passed down to my sister and then to me was a complete piece of crap. Rear brakes failed TWICE, resulting in two accidents (the second of which totaled the car), and the transmission blew @ 62k miles. So can you see how I might have developed some of the opinions that I've acquired?
We know the story. Your whole family supports Hondas and had 2 domestics that were terrible. You have shared it before. I can share my families vehicle history too, with a 350k Suburban and a 400k+ 82 Firebird. I go through multiple vehicles every year so I dont have a long history with any one, but the one I have kept is American and would put any Honda I have owned to shame. It's a 120k 02 GMC 5.3 that has had nothing replaced including the brakes, and the fronts will probably be replaced at 200k maybe? It doesn't have a lot of miles on it yet, but I'm sure I will have it for another 10 years with the maintenance cost being oil changes and maybe a set of plugs? Just like all of the 70's and 80s Chevy trucks you still see on the road. You can almost keep them indefinately.

Originally Posted by evilZO6
buying foreign goods is as good as buying domestic goods, they all pay fees to do business here. Do you think the GOVT is going to allow all business to go overseas without making sure they get a peice of the profit? And besiudes all that, we're not talking about such a general term as goods, we're talking cars
Do you actually believe this? There won't be anyone in this country to buy Foreign goods if you don't have a job! Maybe we can all have jobs selling Foreign products to each other. Many of these countries we buy from don't even share our ideals. Hell, if the Japanese werent manipulating our currency to keep the yen to dollar ratio high we could not afford to buy any of their products.

If they want to sell their products here they better make them here. It's a policy that the Chinese have enacted and we should do the same.

Last edited by TT632; 02-25-2009 at 10:12 AM.
Old 02-25-2009, 10:51 AM
  #43  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fspeedster
You sir need an *** kick, what have you done for our country lately? If you guys think that buying foreign goods don't harm our economy that you'r just plain stupid. I think people like you is part of the reason why our country is in bad shape, people who just don't give a damm!!!
Originally Posted by evilZO6
I'm in the air force. I was Iraq when my daughter was born
you are a dick and you just got owned

thank you for your service evilz06
Old 02-25-2009, 04:14 PM
  #44  
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
 
Blakbird24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evilZO6
buying foreign goods is as good as buying domestic goods, they all pay fees to do business here.
I'm not getting into this useless argument...but I just could not leave this comment stand. This has got to be just about the most uneducated, ignorant statement in regards to the US economy that I have seen in ANY of these threads. I mean there are some real winners that show up from time to time, but this one just shot to the top of the list.

To the poster - if you really believe that, then you might as well bow out of this thread because EVERYONE in here (even the lovable dumbasses we know so well) are a league above you...two in some cases.

Breathtaking.
Old 02-25-2009, 06:23 PM
  #45  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
evilZO6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blakbird24
I'm not getting into this useless argument...but I just could not leave this comment stand. This has got to be just about the most uneducated, ignorant statement in regards to the US economy that I have seen in ANY of these threads. I mean there are some real winners that show up from time to time, but this one just shot to the top of the list.

To the poster - if you really believe that, then you might as well bow out of this thread because EVERYONE in here (even the lovable dumbasses we know so well) are a league above you...two in some cases.

Breathtaking.

Honestly, i started this thread about where we were going, i didnt want it to get into a freaking domestic vs foreign BATTLE. We're so far off MY topic now that i was just adding fuel to the fire to further **** everyone off. I know thats not true, just seeing what people would say
Old 02-25-2009, 06:44 PM
  #46  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TT632
We know the story. Your whole family supports Hondas and had 2 domestics that were terrible. You have shared it before. I can share my families vehicle history too, with a 350k Suburban and a 400k+ 82 Firebird. I go through multiple vehicles every year so I dont have a long history with any one, but the one I have kept is American and would put any Honda I have owned to shame. It's a 120k 02 GMC 5.3 that has had nothing replaced including the brakes, and the fronts will probably be replaced at 200k maybe? It doesn't have a lot of miles on it yet, but I'm sure I will have it for another 10 years with the maintenance cost being oil changes and maybe a set of plugs? Just like all of the 70's and 80s Chevy trucks you still see on the road. You can almost keep them indefinately.



Do you actually believe this? There won't be anyone in this country to buy Foreign goods if you don't have a job! Maybe we can all have jobs selling Foreign products to each other. Many of these countries we buy from don't even share our ideals. Hell, if the Japanese werent manipulating our currency to keep the yen to dollar ratio high we could not afford to buy any of their products.

If they want to sell their products here they better make them here. It's a policy that the Chinese have enacted and we should do the same.

Human resources are not bound to one industry. There are over 180 major industries in America.
If America's automotive industry fails then we will just have to re-allocate our human resources to other industries.

Furthermore, Japan manipulates the value of their yen, just as we manipulate the value of our dollar, just as Britain manipulates the value of their pound and so on. As a matter of fact, exchange rates fluctuate on a day to day basis, not only from gov't intervention, but through daily market activity.
Also, the yen has been growing in strength while our dollar declines; the US dollar is worth 97.847 yen, the highest it's been in a while.

You should be more concerned with real exchange rate anyway, the exchange rate of GOODS and services, not currency. For example: a 12oz can of coke in Japan costs 100 yen, in New York it costs $1. Another example: NY minimum wage is $7.25, my cousin in England makes 4 pounds an hour, and the current exchange rate there is .7 lbs = 1 USD.

If you want to discuss unfair market strategies, then lets delve into why US corporations are constantly lobbying for tarrifs on goods. Guess what, while they help domestic producers, they hurt domestic consumers just as much as foreign exporters to America, if not more in some cases.

__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ _

Last edited by DiscerningZ32; 02-25-2009 at 08:04 PM. Reason: I editied my comment, because what I said was unnecessarily insulting...
Old 02-25-2009, 06:50 PM
  #47  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For the last time...

Buying foreign goods DOES NOT hurt our economy.

This section of ls1tech is being littered more and more everyday with ignorant, unsubstantiated posts.
Old 02-25-2009, 07:10 PM
  #48  
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
 
Blakbird24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DiscerningZ32
You don't have a very strong grasp of economics, do you?
Human resources are not bound to one industry. There are over 180 major industries in America.
If America's automotive industry fails then we will just have to re-allocate our human resources to other industries.
Funny how you dog on someone elses grasp of economics, then prove you yourself aren't doing so well in that department either.

Rather than diving into a complicated and unnecessary discussion about economic factors affecting employment in this country...i'll keep it simple.

Can you please explain to the class that if it's just as simple as "re-allocating human resources to other industries", then why are unemployment rates near record levels? All those unemployed people should simply be absorbed into other industries, according to your claims, right?

See your comments sound great...hell we'd all love it to work that well. Problem is, it doesn't. See those other industries have to actually be HIRING and looking for people with the same skill sets as those who are unemployed possess. Seeing as the collapse of the American auto industry would mean that the demand for those skill sets would also collapse, those people would end up sitting at home collecting checks. Sure there are IMPORT manufacturers in this country that might be looking to pick up a few good folks (probably at the expense of some of their own employees), but seeing as GM alone employs more American citizens than all the import manufacturers combined, it would help exactly nothing.

Lots of crappy arguments against the domestic automakers here folks.
Old 02-25-2009, 07:33 PM
  #49  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blakbird24
Funny how you dog on someone elses grasp of economics, then prove you yourself aren't doing so well in that department either.

Rather than diving into a complicated and unnecessary discussion about economic factors affecting employment in this country...i'll keep it simple.

Can you please explain to the class that if it's just as simple as "re-allocating human resources to other industries", then why are unemployment rates near record levels? All those unemployed people should simply be absorbed into other industries, according to your claims, right?

See your comments sound great...hell we'd all love it to work that well. Problem is, it doesn't. See those other industries have to actually be HIRING and looking for people with the same skill sets as those who are unemployed possess. Seeing as the collapse of the American auto industry would mean that the demand for those skill sets would also collapse, those people would end up sitting at home collecting checks. Sure there are IMPORT manufacturers in this country that might be looking to pick up a few good folks (probably at the expense of some of their own employees), but seeing as GM alone employs more American citizens than all the import manufacturers combined, it would help exactly nothing.

Lots of crappy arguments against the domestic automakers here folks.
It's not that simple obviously, as you've pointed out.
I made it sound simple (come to think of it, I never did actually), but the process is long and drawn out.
It takes long periods of time, appropriate investment, and communication to successfully re-allocate any resource.
As you mentioned though, the demand for said workers needs to be there, and in the current state of the economy it just isn't.

Tell me though, what should automotive workers do if the industry goes under?
You're not offering a solution, just criticizing a common principal of re-allocating human resource, which needs to be done in some fashion if and when the Automotive industry collapses. No matter how difficult it is or how long it takes.
I guess you're right though, they won't be absorbed into any other industry, they'll just whither away and die.
There is very little demand for unskilled labor in America, maybe they're just **** out of luck.

Don't worry though, I'm sure someone will dump millions of dollars into the economy to kep struggling businesses alive, lowering the real value of our dollar further, and increasing inflation to lower unemployment and just to keep the good 'ol American industry going. How grand.

BTW, I was mainly arguing against argument about foreign countries manipulating their currency, I wasn't going to go into detail about re-allocating resources. I was just stating that it would have to be done at some point if the industry goes under, there just really isn't any other choice in that case...
Do you disagree?

Last edited by DiscerningZ32; 02-25-2009 at 07:53 PM.
Old 02-25-2009, 10:50 PM
  #50  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
IronOutlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well, on the original topic.

I would probably buy a low mileage corvette or maybe a newer fbody.


If things got real bad and I had to buy an import im diggin the new 370z.
Old 02-26-2009, 09:50 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Jakes Dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SSNISTR
Times change, GM will turn it around. Look at the 70's....

I loved the cars in the 70's also. The government didn't have many standards then for smog, safety, paint, etc. etc.

Someone must be one of Obama's wealthy. Calling the ZR-1 a daily driver? Someone else said GM doesn't build fun to drive cars. We build two seat 4's and V8's We build FWD and RWD 6's even V8's. We build turbo charged mini cars and even a turbo HHR. Buy one tell me they aren't fun to drive!

Times do change. The 70's are over government is here to stay. If nothing else fails - again build what you want. Lots of work but much more pride in driving something you build over something a manufacturer built for you.

Then, if everything fails try a Sports Bike!!

Jakes Dad
Old 02-26-2009, 10:42 AM
  #52  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
TT632's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Any dragstrip any time
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by DiscerningZ32
For the last time...

Buying foreign goods DOES NOT hurt our economy.

This section of ls1tech is being littered more and more everyday with ignorant, unsubstantiated posts.
You should run for office in California. Maybe, when we all get layed off, a foreign company will come in and hire all of us. Being a former Develpment Engineer for both a Japanese and an American Automotive OEM, I can assure you, as a whole the Foreign manufacturers don't employ us any great numbers relative to the amount of vehicles sold here. And when you look at the supplier base, the difference is even larger.

They are successful because they are a net export country and we are less successful, as we stopped being a net export country. Their economy is based on exporting goods, ours is not. We have no reason the manipulate their currency since we are not an export nation anyway. They will also support their jobs before ours, as should we. Foreign car supporters, cant seem to grasp this concept. They think we are all just part of one big global democratic family...Kumbaya. Drink that Foreign coolaid guys.

And back to the topic, if things get real bad, you can give up buying any foreign automobile, because you will not be able to afford one without a job.

Last edited by TT632; 02-26-2009 at 10:48 AM.
Old 02-26-2009, 12:43 PM
  #53  
TECH Regular
 
jimmy169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It's funny some of you talk of how hurt our economy is by not buying American, but those same people will fight against fuel efficient vehicle's or global warming or w/e and not once complain about the money we are sending oversea's when we buy gas. Hurting our economy by not buying American cars huge deal to some, but sending 100's of billions annually out of our country, all a sham right? How much money did Exxon make this year in profit off American worker's backs as our economy tanked?

I'm not saying American cars are less fuel efficient I know they are and they are on top in about every class when it come's to fuel efficiency, but I find it funny and really ironic people will fight tooth and nail to buy American to keep money here but will fight tooth and nail against greener or more fuel efficient technology to keep our money here.

Last edited by jimmy169; 02-26-2009 at 12:54 PM.
Old 02-26-2009, 01:36 PM
  #54  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
PopaPork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlotte NC...but a Jersey boy till death
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hahahha Never a truer spoken word!
Old 02-26-2009, 02:54 PM
  #55  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
TT632's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Any dragstrip any time
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by jimmy169
It's funny some of you talk of how hurt our economy is by not buying American, but those same people will fight against fuel efficient vehicle's or global warming or w/e and not once complain about the money we are sending oversea's when we buy gas. Hurting our economy by not buying American cars huge deal to some, but sending 100's of billions annually out of our country, all a sham right? How much money did Exxon make this year in profit off American worker's backs as our economy tanked?

I'm not saying American cars are less fuel efficient I know they are and they are on top in about every class when it come's to fuel efficiency, but I find it funny and really ironic people will fight tooth and nail to buy American to keep money here but will fight tooth and nail against greener or more fuel efficient technology to keep our money here.

That's a broad statement, but considering this is a v8 related site I can see how that presumption can be made. Can't speak for others, but Buying American is a way of life in my house for all products. Gasoline, plastic Chinese junk or anything else, gets as low of a ranking as Foreign built vehicles to me. If it's made here, I'll pay more for it if need be, including switching over to Methanol and Ethanol for the race car. With vehicles, it’s easy to do the research to see what’s made here. GM, Ford and Chrysler have higher American content than any of the Foreign vehicles and employ the most Americans. More Americans working is good for all of us! Hell, it’s even good for the Foreigners considering we are their #1 customer. Honda, Nissan and Toyota in that order employ the most Americans of the Foreign brands. This does not include their Luxury brands which are mostly Japanese content. You want to support American jobs and still buy an import brand, forego getting that Lexus and buy a Camry instead. VW, BMW. Mercedes, Hyundai, and the sub tier Japanese cars provide the fewest American jobs. You want to support more American jobs stop supporting those who don't buy from us and dump their products on Our shores.

If you’re talking about going green, I wouldn't look at it in a totally positive light. Look at California; it is a good example of what we could become. They are probably the greenest state in the country, but they buy the fewest American built vehicles, have the most legislation, most Lawyers, largest budget deficit, and of course- home to the octo-mom the symbol of bureaucracy!
Old 02-26-2009, 03:08 PM
  #56  
TECH Regular
 
DiscerningZ32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TT632
You should run for office in California. Maybe, when we all get layed off, a foreign company will come in and hire all of us. Being a former Develpment Engineer for both a Japanese and an American Automotive OEM, I can assure you, as a whole the Foreign manufacturers don't employ us any great numbers relative to the amount of vehicles sold here. And when you look at the supplier base, the difference is even larger.

They are successful because they are a net export country and we are less successful, as we stopped being a net export country. Their economy is based on exporting goods, ours is not. We have no reason the manipulate their currency since we are not an export nation anyway. They will also support their jobs before ours, as should we. Foreign car supporters, cant seem to grasp this concept. They think we are all just part of one big global democratic family...Kumbaya. Drink that Foreign coolaid guys.

And back to the topic, if things get real bad, you can give up buying any foreign automobile, because you will not be able to afford one without a job.

Most of what you have said is true.

Overall, buying foreign can hurt domestic producers and in the end result in loss of jobs.
But, being open to trade and importing cars can also overall be better off for the consumer and the social welfare of America and society.
I definitely agree that we need to export more goods, but as it stands right now, we're having trouble just staying afloat.
I also agree that we should support domestic jobs, but that doesn't mean we should do so by closing trade with foreign auto producers or placing a tarrif on goods imported.
I think our government should support the big three, but if they fall on their faces again due to poor sales, inefficient marketing, and/or limited consumer base (mostly just America) then it's just plain foolish to keep reviving them.
It's possible that keeping them afloat is not the best decision...

As it stands as far as affording an automobile, then the support of the big three can be just as detrimental to affording anything.
Inflation that will result from the up coming economic plans will mean more jobs, but too much inflation is obviously a bad thing.

I rushed this post because I need to get outta here, I'll clean it up when I get home...
Old 03-02-2009, 10:43 AM
  #57  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
TT632's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Any dragstrip any time
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I would have to agree that keeping a company with a poor business model or design(s) afloat is not a good idea. We can probably look as far as Fiat or the French automakers to get an idea of that course of action. We can also put almost any Chinese built vehicle in that catagory. Actually, that has not worked out that badly for those countries, but it goes against traditional American capitalism.

I will admit that I have a bias towards American made products, based on our future well being as Americans. I think the British are a prime example of giving up their automotive heritage to foreign companies. If I bought a mini I would want a British Mini, not one made by BMW.

As far as the desirability of the latest American offerings, In my opinion they are better than ever; Ford and Chevy trucks, The SS, The G8, the Challenger and even the new Malibu (I can't recall a time that I would consider buying a front wheel drive American built vehicle when a RWD was available until now). In addition, the major Foreign companies have been introducing very fuel "Inefficient" vehicles (SUV and Trucks) at a time when the American lines are getting better every year. The American public appears completely ignorant to this, which is a shame. You can't intoduce a Prius and claim you are helping the evironment and build a giant Tundra plant and build a V8 4runner with worst in class mileage at the same time. They have apparently pulled this off?

Arguably, legacy issues with respect to health care, finance and the union are a bigger driver than product desirability. If GM loses XX% on every vehicle because of these cost, they are operating at a position of weakness compared to their competitors.

Last edited by TT632; 03-02-2009 at 04:06 PM.



Quick Reply: Where are you going now?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.