Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Government wants up to 62 mpg by 2025

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2010, 10:00 PM
  #41  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Anyone that has even a basic grasp on Astronomy or Science (Physics in particular) will not come to the conclusion that the moon landing is fake. They don't even have the filming techniques now to accurately depict a walk on the moon without using tons of animation, and they DEFINITELY didn't have the technology to do it 40+ years ago.
Old 10-04-2010, 10:06 PM
  #42  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
TrippyJoey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Brownsville, TX
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Anyone that has even a basic grasp on Astronomy or Science (Physics in particular) will not come to the conclusion that the moon landing is fake. They don't even have the filming techniques now to accurately depict a walk on the moon without using tons of animation, and they DEFINITELY didn't have the technology to do it 40+ years ago.
Some university physics, and I do believe the landing is real.
Old 10-04-2010, 10:27 PM
  #43  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Shackleford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by XxGarbSxX
The government needs to stop trying to dictate how the market works. The market is not the government's responsibility, and forcing arbitrary fuel economy guidelines on the auto industry is neither going to help consumers nor is it going to measurably help the environment. All they're going to do is raise car prices to the point where families can scarcely afford a second car and hurt the economy.

Sorry if that gets the thread locked, but it's something that needed to be said.
The federal government regulates far far too much. Inordinate is even a gross understatement.

The entire argument for this "save-the-planet" crap is based on the fallacy that carbon dioxide is a pollutant or more generally that we're killing the planet - whatever that means. Carbon dioxide is food for vegetation. To say it's a pollutant is supreme ignorance. Also, water vapor is the most important natural greenhouse gas. The "greenhouse effect" allows for life on Earth with a nice, warm global average temperature - whatever that means.
Old 10-04-2010, 10:29 PM
  #44  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
 
Shackleford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Anyone that has even a basic grasp on Astronomy or Science (Physics in particular) will not come to the conclusion that the moon landing is fake. They don't even have the filming techniques now to accurately depict a walk on the moon without using tons of animation, and they DEFINITELY didn't have the technology to do it 40+ years ago.
It's also hard if not impossible to reproduce the natural movement of human activity in such a reduced gravitational field as well.
Old 10-04-2010, 10:55 PM
  #45  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
WSsick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 2,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Shackleford, please refrain from using logic, it is much too confusing. kthxbye.
Old 10-04-2010, 11:40 PM
  #46  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Shackleford
It's also hard if not impossible to reproduce the natural movement of human activity in such a reduced gravitational field as well.
Yep, nobody has been able to do it yet. That's a big part of the reason that basically every space film ever made has either supposedly been in space (zero gravity), or on a planet with Earth-like gravity.
Old 10-04-2010, 11:44 PM
  #47  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
180ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default



The New GM (Government Motors)

Proudly Introduces


The 2011 Obummer

This car runs on hot air, b*#l-sh&* and broken promises.

It has three wheels that speed the vehicle through tight left turns.

It comes complete with Tele Prompters to help the occupants talk their way out of any violations.

The transparent canopy reveals the plastic smiles still on the faces of all the happy owners.

Comes in S, M, L, XL and 2XL

It won’t get you to work, but hey, there aren’t any jobs anyway!
Old 10-05-2010, 12:14 AM
  #48  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 180ls1

The New GM (Government Motors)

Proudly Introduces


The 2011 Obummer

This car runs on hot air, b*#l-sh&* and broken promises.

It has three wheels that speed the vehicle through tight left turns.

It comes complete with Tele Prompters to help the occupants talk their way out of any violations.

The transparent canopy reveals the plastic smiles still on the faces of all the happy owners.

Comes in S, M, L, XL and 2XL

It won’t get you to work, but hey, there aren’t any jobs anyway!

Originally Posted by Vendetta
Do not post any political or religious discussion in the lounge
Old 10-05-2010, 01:51 AM
  #49  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by XxGarbSxX
It's a shame that so few people realize that water vapor is a much larger contributor to the greenhouse effect than carbon dioxide. Nothing like taking a step or two backward and trying to claim that we're actually going forward.
Its a shame when people dont research BOTH sides of the coin.

While true that water vapor is the largest contributor to the greenhouse effect...its not that simple. It is regulated by a feedback loop in the atmosphere.

Using these cars would not increase temperatures for various reasons...research it some more....from more than one source.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/wate...nhouse-gas.htm

Sounds like they are having quite the argument over it as well. Who to believe? Well...who could possibly lose a **** load of money CURRENTLY if your theory is wrong...think about it. Plenty of propaganda from both sides though...

Anyone can find a scientist/source to make a claim for or against anything. You could probably find research as to why fruits and vegetables are bad for your health. Research both sides and then make your logical conclusion.

Last edited by UltraZLS1; 10-05-2010 at 02:01 AM.



Quick Reply: Government wants up to 62 mpg by 2025



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 AM.