GM stepping up!! Z06X and Camaro SSX coming!!
#61
TECH Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So what suspension upgrades did the Camaro actually get? Paint, a cage, a stripped interior, and lest I forget, a fire suppression system don't really mean **** if the suspension isn't up to par.
With Ford and now Dodge both having production drag cars, I thought GM would have gone that route with the Camaro. An LS9-powered, stripped Camaro with an upgraded rear would be pretty competitive at the drag strip.
With Ford and now Dodge both having production drag cars, I thought GM would have gone that route with the Camaro. An LS9-powered, stripped Camaro with an upgraded rear would be pretty competitive at the drag strip.
I'd settle for a stripped down LS3, keep the price in the low $30s and you'd sell them like hot cakes.
#62
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yeah, but the Thunderbird was always intended to be more on the "soft" side than the Corvette. And they've bastardized it enough already, where I don't think it will be coming back.
#63
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Alphanumerics FTW1!! ?
#65
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
All these new cars are nice guys but Im just going to stick with my 98-02 f-bodys I love them more plus if I feel like blowing 30k or even 40k I will put it in a f-body and you can bring your new car and I will be seeing u behind me the entire damn time lol
#67
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
#68
Teching In
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Castle Rock, Co
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
These aren't for sale...just concept cars. I am not ford or chevy I appreciate great cars either way. Ford is smoking Chevy here though, they already have a version of the SSX and it is for sale for 79k no way they could sell the SSX for that.
http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2010/1...2010-pri-show/
http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2010/1...2010-pri-show/
#69
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
These aren't for sale...just concept cars. I am not ford or chevy I appreciate great cars either way. Ford is smoking Chevy here though, they already have a version of the SSX and it is for sale for 79k no way they could sell the SSX for that.
http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2010/1...2010-pri-show/
http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2010/1...2010-pri-show/
#72
#73
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
P.S. create 2 more iterations 2 and 5 years apart, with production increasing with each generation?
Last edited by 88blackgt; 12-04-2010 at 03:06 AM.
#76
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'd like to see GM produce both these cars, mostly the Camaro, since the Corvette is already covering about every possible want from customers. Sadly, I expect it will be a very expensive upgrade for either. The good news is, GM will sell a butt load of the parts that make up the cars exterior, specifically the carbon fiber parts. They'll reduce weight for sure and many owners will snap up these race style parts, helping GM profit.
You call selling every car built before the end of the model year a failure? I don't think there's a way to properly describe how incorrect that is. Suffice to say, no it wasn't a failure at all. It was the epitome of success.
Btw, when you got onto Chaman about being a fanboy, you mentioned that when the Z comes out it will outperform the GT500(albeit only for a year)... Yet you complained to him about comparing cars without performance stats available, saying we haven't seen the stats of the Z yet. That didn't make any sense. For all we know, the GT500 (and almost certainly the GT350) will perform better than the Z when it does arrive. We just don't know because we've not seen the Z out here yet. We do "know" (one track) the Mustang bested the Corvette GS, and that's pretty darned good. His point was valid in that we have seen the Mustangs already.
1st of all, there was no 2001 Cobra R. I suppose that makes it super-ultra-limited! There was a 1993, 1995 and 2000 Cobra R. Next, I don't see any real comparison being done.
Finally, there are at least 2 current Mustangs available that (so far) seem to perform better than that old Cobra R, both bearing the nameplate "SHELBY GT." These are also made by the SVT department, apparently, like the Cobra R's were... and all Cobra's I would think.
Those cars are a good reason for GM and American automobile fans in general to want a solid high end performer wearing "Camaro" badges. I'm kinda tired of having to compare the upper end Mustangs to Corvettes myself. More than tired of it when the base Corvette loses heads up comparisons to any Mustang, specifically any that sells for less and still seats 4.
BRING ON THE Z/28! Let's see it already, on the road or at least in the show room. For the record, I'm still a Corvette fan and would prefer a ZO6 over any version Mustang or Camaro available at current pricing for DD use. It's simply one of the most titillating cars ever built. Corvette SCREAMS "excitement" while most others are only pointing toward it.
Btw, when you got onto Chaman about being a fanboy, you mentioned that when the Z comes out it will outperform the GT500(albeit only for a year)... Yet you complained to him about comparing cars without performance stats available, saying we haven't seen the stats of the Z yet. That didn't make any sense. For all we know, the GT500 (and almost certainly the GT350) will perform better than the Z when it does arrive. We just don't know because we've not seen the Z out here yet. We do "know" (one track) the Mustang bested the Corvette GS, and that's pretty darned good. His point was valid in that we have seen the Mustangs already.
Finally, there are at least 2 current Mustangs available that (so far) seem to perform better than that old Cobra R, both bearing the nameplate "SHELBY GT." These are also made by the SVT department, apparently, like the Cobra R's were... and all Cobra's I would think.
Those cars are a good reason for GM and American automobile fans in general to want a solid high end performer wearing "Camaro" badges. I'm kinda tired of having to compare the upper end Mustangs to Corvettes myself. More than tired of it when the base Corvette loses heads up comparisons to any Mustang, specifically any that sells for less and still seats 4.
BRING ON THE Z/28! Let's see it already, on the road or at least in the show room. For the record, I'm still a Corvette fan and would prefer a ZO6 over any version Mustang or Camaro available at current pricing for DD use. It's simply one of the most titillating cars ever built. Corvette SCREAMS "excitement" while most others are only pointing toward it.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
#77
Restricted User
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fleetwood, PA
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's funny because if I was talking about a 2000 Camaro R, the same members would be calling it a massive failure.
#78
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'd like to see GM produce both these cars, mostly the Camaro, since the Corvette is already covering about every possible want from customers. Sadly, I expect it will be a very expensive upgrade for either. The good news is, GM will sell a butt load of the parts that make up the cars exterior, specifically the carbon fiber parts. They'll reduce weight for sure and many owners will snap up these race style parts, helping GM profit.
Btw, when you got onto Chaman about being a fanboy, you mentioned that when the Z comes out it will outperform the GT500(albeit only for a year)... Yet you complained to him about comparing cars without performance stats available, saying we haven't seen the stats of the Z yet. That didn't make any sense. For all we know, the GT500 (and almost certainly the GT350) will perform better than the Z when it does arrive. We just don't know because we've not seen the Z out here yet. We do "know" (one track) the Mustang bested the Corvette GS, and that's pretty darned good. His point was valid in that we have seen the Mustangs already.
1st of all, there was no 2001 Cobra R. I suppose that makes it super-ultra-limited! There was a 1993, 1995 and 2000 Cobra R. Next, I don't see any real comparison being done.
Finally, there are at least 2 current Mustangs available that (so far) seem to perform better than that old Cobra R, both bearing the nameplate "SHELBY GT." These are also made by the SVT department, apparently, like the Cobra R's were... and all Cobra's I would think.
Those cars are a good reason for GM and American automobile fans in general to want a solid high end performer wearing "Camaro" badges. I'm kinda tired of having to compare the upper end Mustangs to Corvettes myself. More than tired of it when the base Corvette loses heads up comparisons to any Mustang, specifically any that sells for less and still seats 4.
BRING ON THE Z/28! Let's see it already, on the road or at least in the show room. For the record, I'm still a Corvette fan and would prefer a ZO6 over any version Mustang or Camaro available at current pricing for DD use. It's simply one of the most titillating cars ever built. Corvette SCREAMS "excitement" while most others are only pointing toward it.![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
Btw, when you got onto Chaman about being a fanboy, you mentioned that when the Z comes out it will outperform the GT500(albeit only for a year)... Yet you complained to him about comparing cars without performance stats available, saying we haven't seen the stats of the Z yet. That didn't make any sense. For all we know, the GT500 (and almost certainly the GT350) will perform better than the Z when it does arrive. We just don't know because we've not seen the Z out here yet. We do "know" (one track) the Mustang bested the Corvette GS, and that's pretty darned good. His point was valid in that we have seen the Mustangs already.
1st of all, there was no 2001 Cobra R. I suppose that makes it super-ultra-limited! There was a 1993, 1995 and 2000 Cobra R. Next, I don't see any real comparison being done.
Finally, there are at least 2 current Mustangs available that (so far) seem to perform better than that old Cobra R, both bearing the nameplate "SHELBY GT." These are also made by the SVT department, apparently, like the Cobra R's were... and all Cobra's I would think.
Those cars are a good reason for GM and American automobile fans in general to want a solid high end performer wearing "Camaro" badges. I'm kinda tired of having to compare the upper end Mustangs to Corvettes myself. More than tired of it when the base Corvette loses heads up comparisons to any Mustang, specifically any that sells for less and still seats 4.
BRING ON THE Z/28! Let's see it already, on the road or at least in the show room. For the record, I'm still a Corvette fan and would prefer a ZO6 over any version Mustang or Camaro available at current pricing for DD use. It's simply one of the most titillating cars ever built. Corvette SCREAMS "excitement" while most others are only pointing toward it.
![Grin](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_grin.gif)
Agree with pretty much everything here^
#79
TECH Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sure...when you neglect to mention the discounts and promotions required to sell JUST 300 cars. They were able to sell about half the production based on specs alone, BEFORE the car even hit the road. Once people learned what the car really was, sales slowed. The car was riddled with issues and was terribly outperformed at it's price point. Again, a great idea ruined by overpricing. I was in college and working for the Lehigh Valley's largest Ford dealer at the time, so I know all about this car and how you could actually pick it up for only a couple grand more than a fully loaded GT. I would have taken the GT over it myself.
It's funny because if I was talking about a 2000 Camaro R, the same members would be calling it a massive failure.
It's funny because if I was talking about a 2000 Camaro R, the same members would be calling it a massive failure.
Last edited by Lethal Z; 12-05-2010 at 01:20 PM.
#80
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Once people learned what the car really was, sales slowed. The car was riddled with issues and was terribly outperformed at it's price point.
Again, a great idea ruined by overpricing. I was in college and working for the Lehigh Valley's largest Ford dealer at the time, so I know all about this car and how you could actually pick it up for only a couple grand more than a fully loaded GT. I would have taken the GT over it myself.
Yes, it was over-priced, but not for any reason other than what it lacked in creature comforts and otherwise standard GT features, like a rear seat.
I do wonder how you know all about it, considering your dealer probably only got 1, delivered at night, hardly seen by anyone, not to mention you surely weren't positioned to buy one. I worked at a dealership back then myself, and we weren't allowed to touch ours without permission from the GM.
![Embarassed](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_emb.gif)
It's funny because if I was talking about a 2000 Camaro R, the same members would be calling it a massive failure.
Enough on all this. I was away for the past few weeks.