Recall and repair? Not so fast...
#1
Recall and repair? Not so fast...
More awesomeness from GM... The new one, not the old... http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...77I0Z820110819
This has "winner" written all over it.
This has "winner" written all over it.
#2
thats bullshit!
GM should have to pay double jsut for trying that ****.
I think im gonna go sell about $100,000 worth of crack and get out of it because that was "the old me"
GM should have to pay double jsut for trying that ****.
I think im gonna go sell about $100,000 worth of crack and get out of it because that was "the old me"
#4
The bigger problem has yet to present itself to GM... Once this story concludes, and GM loses their case(and I believe they will, all things considered), they will have only made more Americans angry at the company and thus, lose more business. Bad ideas abound...
#5
[QUOTE=It'llrun;15305629]GM loses their case(and I believe they will, all things considered)[QUOTE]
Not so fast; they won a similair suit already. Put simply they are separate entities in the eyes of the law, the same way you wouldnt expect Dodge to pay for Ford's recalls after Ford goes out of business. Shitty yes, but they do have a basis for denying these claims.
Not so fast; they won a similair suit already. Put simply they are separate entities in the eyes of the law, the same way you wouldnt expect Dodge to pay for Ford's recalls after Ford goes out of business. Shitty yes, but they do have a basis for denying these claims.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
While they may not have a legal obligation to fix the problem in the eyes of the law, they most certainly do have an ethical obligation to fix the problem in the eyes of the public. Being a dick to your customers to avoid an expense only helps with short term finances. In the long run, it will end up costing them exponentially more in negative PR and lost sales.
#9
Unfortunately, ethics and economics are separate courses in college. While this is a potentially big cost for GM to deal with, it is an even bigger cost in terms of public image. However, if the matter is resolved simply by directing the cost to "old GM" and the warranty repair is taken care of, I really don't see the problem. You just have to knock on the correct door.
#11
While they may not have a legal obligation to fix the problem in the eyes of the law, they most certainly do have an ethical obligation to fix the problem in the eyes of the public. Being a dick to your customers to avoid an expense only helps with short term finances. In the long run, it will end up costing them exponentially more in negative PR and lost sales.
#13
None of the companies that received this "bailout" deserved or was entitled to ANY money from the tax payers. 50% of the nation just went along with it... Myself and everyone else as tax payers are NOT responsible period for the financial woes of a private corporation.
#14
Not so fast; they won a similair suit already. Put simply they are separate entities in the eyes of the law, the same way you wouldnt expect Dodge to pay for Ford's recalls after Ford goes out of business. Shitty yes, but they do have a basis for denying these claims.
#15
They are just using the benefits of going bankrupt and that includes not having to pay alot of debt and no longer being responsible to uphold anything they did wrong or right in the past because they dont have to by law thats the upside to doing it is being able to wipe away all the ****-ups you did in the past and start fresh.Yes it sucks but alot of people do it all the time and people dont care hell most people just say go bankrupt change the company name and move on thats been the practice for alot of business owners for decades but most people didnt care until a gaint like GM did it and asked for us the tax payers to help but if we didnt could you imagine what the fall out of that would have been to the people that work for gm and all the suppliers from parts to paint to office supplies?It would be way worse then the money spent to keep a business of this size alive in the U.S and help us pull out of the slump the U.S is iin wrong or right it was the best choice and i hope it works out for all.
#16
(church lady voice)..."how convenient"...
Nice way to sidestep your responsibilities. *** U GM. I'll never buy a new car from them. I also stay out of the parts dept as much as I can...which is alot.
Nice way to sidestep your responsibilities. *** U GM. I'll never buy a new car from them. I also stay out of the parts dept as much as I can...which is alot.
#17
Seems like they've stumbled upon the next big business idea. If you know you make a faulty product:
1. Sell product anyway.
2. Profit.
3. File Bankruptcy.
4. Create new company making the same product (or slightly different product).
5. Profits protected.
Just when I was starting to like GM again...
1. Sell product anyway.
2. Profit.
3. File Bankruptcy.
4. Create new company making the same product (or slightly different product).
5. Profits protected.
Just when I was starting to like GM again...
#18
Seems like they've stumbled upon the next big business idea. If you know you make a faulty product:
1. Sell product anyway.
2. Profit.
3. File Bankruptcy.
4. Create new company making the same product (or slightly different product).
5. Profits protected.
Just when I was starting to like GM again...
1. Sell product anyway.
2. Profit.
3. File Bankruptcy.
4. Create new company making the same product (or slightly different product).
5. Profits protected.
Just when I was starting to like GM again...
#19
Most companies who file for bankruptcy protection aren't any of the largest in the world. Most don't make products everyone has a use for on a regular basis. Most didn't get a bailout from "We, the People" either. There's plenty of reason to treat this situation as if GM is different... It is different.
Taking into consideration, GM did make the repairs for some(a large share of their market) who needed it while telling those who can't buy multiple vehicles at once, just makes it look worse, as if GM is only after the money. They made all those vehicles and they should stand behind them identically regardless who bought one. GM addressed it as a safety item when it came to cop cars, so they should do the same for any model using the same parts and showing similar problems. They should at least try so they won't have to lose business later. After all, the common single car purchase still makes up a larger percentage of sales. Those customers are no less important in the end.
Taking into consideration, GM did make the repairs for some(a large share of their market) who needed it while telling those who can't buy multiple vehicles at once, just makes it look worse, as if GM is only after the money. They made all those vehicles and they should stand behind them identically regardless who bought one. GM addressed it as a safety item when it came to cop cars, so they should do the same for any model using the same parts and showing similar problems. They should at least try so they won't have to lose business later. After all, the common single car purchase still makes up a larger percentage of sales. Those customers are no less important in the end.
#20
They are just using the benefits of going bankrupt and that includes not having to pay alot of debt and no longer being responsible to uphold anything they did wrong or right in the past because they dont have to by law thats the upside to doing it is being able to wipe away all the ****-ups you did in the past and start fresh.Yes it sucks but alot of people do it all the time and people dont care hell most people just say go bankrupt change the company name and move on thats been the practice for alot of business owners for decades
most people didnt care until a gaint like GM did it and asked for us the tax payers to help but if we didnt could you imagine what the fall out of that would have been to the people that work for gm and all the suppliers from parts to paint to office supplies?It would be way worse then the money spent to keep a business of this size alive in the U.S and help us pull out of the slump the U.S is iin wrong or right it was the best choice and i hope it works out for all.