C7 ZO6 to be unveiled at Detroit Auto Show
#81
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: chattanooga Tn
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yup.Thanks to "The McGee Quad Cam" (2nd iteration) and perhaps a couple others running so strongly, companies like General Motors, along with some engine builders and even race teams lobbied against them altogether or at least to handicap them and, in 1997, NHRA outlawed DOHC engines and made a rule change requiring no more than 1 camshaft per engine and no more than 2 valves per cylinder...
#82
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They don't need to be any faster. ETs have gotten quicker in the past 10 years or so, but trap speeds really haven't...kinda like NASCAR. They are already going as fast as the tracks/safety concerns will allow them to.
#84
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#86
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by It'llrun
btw, clown... I know this is old and all, and wasn't modified by tuners at the time, but think this over in that massive brain of yours... http://www.gizmag.com/go/4286/
Originally Posted by It'llrun
The NHRA has BANNED the use of DOHC engines in its top classes, so we won't likely see them at TF power levels, but it's not that they cannot reach those levels, because they can.
Great, you Googled it. Read further into those links. Still not the same as power/liter.
Originally Posted by assasinator
also a current formula one engine has massive restrictions. charge cooling, block materials, crank materials, piston shape, valve shape, etc.
Anymore excuses?
#87
http://www.epi-eng.com/piston_engine..._cup_to_f1.htm
http://www.epi-eng.com/piston_engine..._yardstick.htm
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/201...han-you-think/
#90
TECH Enthusiast