New Camaro!! Finally Official!!!
#41
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit rock city
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I agree, Muscle Car = Horsepower.
Lighter is better, but HP is cheaper than losing weight to gain performance.
The way horsepower is going these days the top engine offered could be 500 hp no problem. Think LS7.
It won't be such a big deal by 2009/2010.
The only way this could be derailed is by higher fuel prices and or some type of HP limit laws imposed by the Fed. Gov.
(Higher insurance will only limit the # of buyers)
My .02
Lighter is better, but HP is cheaper than losing weight to gain performance.
The way horsepower is going these days the top engine offered could be 500 hp no problem. Think LS7.
It won't be such a big deal by 2009/2010.
The only way this could be derailed is by higher fuel prices and or some type of HP limit laws imposed by the Fed. Gov.
(Higher insurance will only limit the # of buyers)
My .02
#42
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Prairie de Femme, LA
Posts: 3,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i don't care what it is called, as long as GM makes a decent looking rear wheel drive v8 making 400+ horses. that is way too long to wait though. i WILL have a GT500 by then
#44
Banned
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Renegade
We all have high hopes but I'm not going to believe a thing until I can go buy one. With my luck they will probably be set for release and some tree hugger will complain and they will have to stop production so they can sell little 4 bangers. Damn treehuggers
Excuse the language, I'm pissed off because my car was almost destroyed by a teenage girl earlier today.
![Dark](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/dark.gif)
Excuse the language, I'm pissed off because my car was almost destroyed by a teenage girl earlier today.
#47
TECH Senior Member
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Id be surprised if the top of line model (I assume SS) gets anything over 400hp. You know GM's little "cant beat the Corvette" rule. It will probably have the 400hp LS2, rated at 385hp so the C6 boys dont get upset.
![The Judge](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_judge.gif)
#48
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lisle, IL
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah my dad works for gm and have know about the camaro coming back, he hasn't said anything about the firebird, but i think it depends on how the gto works out, and the corvette rule does exist, cars can come close in hp, but can't surpass it
#49
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit rock city
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JD_AMG
Id be surprised if the top of line model (I assume SS) gets anything over 400hp. You know GM's little "cant beat the Corvette" rule. It will probably have the 400hp LS2, rated at 385hp so the C6 boys dont get upset. ![The Judge](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_judge.gif)
![The Judge](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_judge.gif)
#50
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by kbronSS
ill believe it when i see it. better be quick, im itching for a Cobra......they are starting to grow on me.
#51
10 Second Club
iTrader: (24)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by baddogz28
My guess on engines:
240 HP 3.9L
303 HP 5.3L
400 HP 6.0L
![Secret](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/secret2.gif)
240 HP 3.9L
303 HP 5.3L
400 HP 6.0L
![Secret](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies3/secret2.gif)
Originally Posted by Anonymous
I agree, Muscle Car = Horsepower.
Lighter is better, but HP is cheaper than losing weight to gain performance.
The way horsepower is going these days the top engine offered could be 500 hp no problem. Think LS7.
It won't be such a big deal by 2009/2010.
The only way this could be derailed is by higher fuel prices and or some type of HP limit laws imposed by the Fed. Gov.
(Higher insurance will only limit the # of buyers)
My .02
Lighter is better, but HP is cheaper than losing weight to gain performance.
The way horsepower is going these days the top engine offered could be 500 hp no problem. Think LS7.
It won't be such a big deal by 2009/2010.
The only way this could be derailed is by higher fuel prices and or some type of HP limit laws imposed by the Fed. Gov.
(Higher insurance will only limit the # of buyers)
My .02
I think that the camaro may come w/a 425hp option by 2010, just because of the 425hp motor thats going in the GNX, im guessing a ls2 or ls2 variant, i think it would be kind of cool if the z28 was king of the hill like it had been before, and not the SS. I bet by 2010 the vette will see a boost in power on the base model, maybe 450 and the zo6 at 550 or 600, this is all purely my thoughts/hopes, dont take them as fact, its just what i think, but now i have a dilema, mod the TA, or save the the camaro/gto?
#53
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit rock city
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 98NBM_TransAm
I think that the camaro may come w/a 425hp option by 2010, just because of the 425hp motor thats going in the GNX....
i'm guessing your getting this info based on a fake gnx pic and spec sheet that's been floating around for a while, i don't believe there is any real info out there to support this.....
#54
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, Fl
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Realistically, the Camaro could hit the streets much earlier than 2009
.
It will likely have the engines mentioned. Likely at about 390hp, though, as the top end. The possible variance would be if the Corvette's hp got increased (which is very possible).
![Secret2](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/secret.gif)
It will likely have the engines mentioned.
Originally Posted by baddogz28
My guess on engines:
240 HP 3.9L
303 HP 5.3L
400 HP 6.0L
240 HP 3.9L
303 HP 5.3L
400 HP 6.0L
#56
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: detroit rock city
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 2002BlackSS
Realistically, the Camaro could hit the streets much earlier than 2009
.
It will likely have the engines mentioned.
Likely at about 390hp, though, as the top end. The possible variance would be if the Corvette's hp got increased (which is very possible).
![Secret2](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/secret.gif)
It will likely have the engines mentioned.
Likely at about 390hp, though, as the top end. The possible variance would be if the Corvette's hp got increased (which is very possible).
how are they getting around the issue with montreal? or are they building it there? paying them off?
and if it waits till 2009 it's not really gonna have one of the current power plants is it?
inquiring minds want to know
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#58
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, Fl
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by jdustu
why would they bother rating it at 390 when the gto already has one rated the same as the vette?
how are they getting around the issue with montreal? or are they building it there? paying them off?
and if it waits till 2009 it's not really gonna have one of the current power plants is it?
inquiring minds want to know![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
how are they getting around the issue with montreal? or are they building it there? paying them off?
and if it waits till 2009 it's not really gonna have one of the current power plants is it?
inquiring minds want to know
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
1. Because, as already mentioned, they do have a "rule" that keeps the Corvette as the top dog. FWIW, I don't know the justification GM execs have for it, but I imagine it's along the lines of the other vehicles GM offers with the same power as the Corvette are in different product lines and don't match the vette in overall performance.
2. It will not be manufactured at that plant. It will likely be in MI, possibly Lansing. While I don't know of a final settlement concerning the issue of name use, the fact that they are releasing a build date would clearly demonstrate that it has been resolved.
3. As I said, it's likely the Camaro will hit the streets much sooner than 2009, which would certainly dictate the use of those engines. Even if it does come out around then, you'll know what to expect as a powerplant by looking at the vette.
Last edited by 2002BlackSS; 08-06-2005 at 07:10 PM.
#59
11 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ActionJack
I looked up what PHR quoted Bob as saying. Here it tis:
Quote from PHR:
"GM's product boss Bob Lutz says, "Firebird's day is gone." Nevertheless, look for Lutz to endow Pontiac with performance models such as GTO and Solstice in the coming years. The coming Zeta platform which will underpin future Camaros will also be the basis for the GTO."
IMHO that Suck *** Big Time!
I would much rather see the Firebird again than an Ill-gotten GTO.
But, I am grateful the Camaro is coming.
Quote from PHR:
"GM's product boss Bob Lutz says, "Firebird's day is gone." Nevertheless, look for Lutz to endow Pontiac with performance models such as GTO and Solstice in the coming years. The coming Zeta platform which will underpin future Camaros will also be the basis for the GTO."
IMHO that Suck *** Big Time!
I would much rather see the Firebird again than an Ill-gotten GTO.
But, I am grateful the Camaro is coming.
man id love to beat his *** for that
#60
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA, Bay Area
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
i think the only way we are getting the firebird back is if we kill the GTO (which sucks), but personally , if the the GTO stays on the path it's on i'd MUCH rather see a new firebird (with more cubes)