End of the line: GM builds last Chevrolet SSR
04-29-2006, 01:23 PM
#44
Originally Posted by TransAm52804
^ = typical GM.
If people wanted a sporty 2-seater for $50K, they go with the Corvette. If they wanted a fast truck, they go with the Lightning for much cheaper (plus it's actually fast), and you can still haul **** with it.
The SSR really served no purpose whatsoever. Had it have been closer to the $30K mark, it wouldn't have been so bad, but to cost as much as it did yet to be so impractical in just about every single way, it was just stupid.
If people wanted a sporty 2-seater for $50K, they go with the Corvette. If they wanted a fast truck, they go with the Lightning for much cheaper (plus it's actually fast), and you can still haul **** with it.
The SSR really served no purpose whatsoever. Had it have been closer to the $30K mark, it wouldn't have been so bad, but to cost as much as it did yet to be so impractical in just about every single way, it was just stupid.
Damn those Lightning's are fast AND good looking. Not as fast OR good looking as my car but I would pick it over the SRT 10.
I would even sell my body as a sex slave if they made an AWD version.
