Nissan R35 GT-R Dyno:
#21
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In my opinion, cars that do what the Skyline-errrr GT-R does are more or less at the top of their capabilities. I don't believe there is more than two hundred horses left to wring out of that engine.
#22
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You haven't seen the Lexus LF-A?
http://www.lexus.com/fcv/lf_a.html
http://www.lexus.com/fcv/lf_a.html
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#23
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And what makes you think that? People who are analyzing the dyno graph and the VR38 and its turbos seem to think it capable of A LOT more. The way the torque curve plateaus off is a direct indication that this engine is SCREAMING for more boost, its only running 10.2PSI and the turbos are said to be capable of a little over 700HP. BPU mods should put this car around 600WHP. So far this engine looks to be capable of a lot more power....
#24
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Those numbers are impressive, a 11.7 1/4 mile time has been advertised. I am more curious of its trap speed at the end. All in all I still would take the C6 Z06. 600 or 700 lbs is nothing to laugh at!
And rumor has it that the ECU has been locked by Nissan, and the fact is the car has turbo's intergrated into the manifolds, so any gains would have to be supported by different headers and down pipes for different turbos.
And rumor has it that the ECU has been locked by Nissan, and the fact is the car has turbo's intergrated into the manifolds, so any gains would have to be supported by different headers and down pipes for different turbos.
#25
12 Second Club
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bucks County, Pa.
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Being a 'Lexus', they probably feel that they can.
![Icon Lol](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies2/icon_lol.gif)
#27
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
^ that translates to insta-pricey.
The LFA will be a different market from the prelims, kinda like the Gallardo, badass, but not the top of the uber performance car world, hence it won't be a threat to a ZR1.
Don't get me wrong, the LFA would be a badass car, especially if there happens to be a trickle down with a non v10 and the reintroduction of a actual RWD performance car for their make. Unlike Nissan, I'd sport a serious 'yota performance car.
A few things do need to be cleared up on the GTR before all the fanbois crow:
computer tuning
driveline strength
engine modability.
The LFA will be a different market from the prelims, kinda like the Gallardo, badass, but not the top of the uber performance car world, hence it won't be a threat to a ZR1.
Don't get me wrong, the LFA would be a badass car, especially if there happens to be a trickle down with a non v10 and the reintroduction of a actual RWD performance car for their make. Unlike Nissan, I'd sport a serious 'yota performance car.
A few things do need to be cleared up on the GTR before all the fanbois crow:
computer tuning
driveline strength
engine modability.
#28
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The GTR's driveline, specifically the transmission is suppose to be "bullet proof" they say. This is just speculation and rumors tossed around.
I dont think the LFA is trying to compete against the ZR1, granted it might be in the same price range. But I know if im going to spend that much money, its not going to be a vette, ZR1 or not...But I agree the LFA is going to be one nice ride!
I dont think the LFA is trying to compete against the ZR1, granted it might be in the same price range. But I know if im going to spend that much money, its not going to be a vette, ZR1 or not...But I agree the LFA is going to be one nice ride!
#29
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I would not spend not one dime on a Lexus sports car, they have not proven that they have any idea how to build a sport car. Now the new Esprit coming out now that may be worth it!
#30
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And what makes you think that? People who are analyzing the dyno graph and the VR38 and its turbos seem to think it capable of A LOT more. The way the torque curve plateaus off is a direct indication that this engine is SCREAMING for more boost, its only running 10.2PSI and the turbos are said to be capable of a little over 700HP. BPU mods should put this car around 600WHP. So far this engine looks to be capable of a lot more power....
Also, that first turbo is pretty much going to bottleneck the car performance-wise, something that has always been an issue with factory twin- and twinscroll turbo setups. Just look at the stock R32-34 turbines or the Supra TT. The first thing that happens is the twins get swapped out for bigger ones or just one MASSIVE turbine.
That plateau in the powerband is not going to help the car on a road course or a dragstrip, where the key to victory is a smooth, consistent delivery of power. The only thing that peaky power production is good for is making numbers on dynos, taking up weight and room, and impressing people. Not trying to argue, but an engine ideally should NEVER have a flat spot in the middle of a dyno reading, that means no additional power is being produced during that moment in time. Twin turbos are supposed to be the cure to the poor spool-up time associated with big-hp turbine setups, but almost always are found with that unfortunate die-off in the middle of the powerband. Personally, I think Nissan should have just used a larger turbine and done some souping-up of the engine internally to make up for the poor boost load from idle.
The problem with that is that the vehicle is AWD, and is a dog to launch unless you have instant torque on tap, which the TT's help with. What I'm trying to say here is that the GT-R was built with a Japanese tuning mindset and not an American one. Think of the Japanese way as an hourglass and the American as a hexagon, wide end up.
As it stands,no matter what I say, the new GT-R has a very nice engine it would seem. I'll reserve my judgement until after it competes in some endurance races and at least places....
Just something about it being only a 3.8L V6 kinda bothers me....not much room for growth there, but power is indeed coming in smaller packages these days...
#32
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Also 1 thing I am surprised about is the lack of direct injection. With the higher CR made possible by DI, they could have developed the engine to make more power down low and out of boost. And used compressors that were mapped for more power at mid to high revs. Also one thing to keep in mind this is a twin turbo system not a sequential twin turbo that would be limited by the smaller turbo. They are two small equal size IHI turbos integrated into the exhaust manifolds.
And one huge thing the 997 TT has is the variable venturi turbos which can be larger and still not have the lag that is usually inevitable with large turbo's.
And one huge thing the 997 TT has is the variable venturi turbos which can be larger and still not have the lag that is usually inevitable with large turbo's.
#33
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Vestal NY
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm not really sure why this conversation got so "in depth". I think it's a cool car, but I can't afford one...or an LFA...or a C6Z. The whp numbers are impressive, even if the dyno was a bit optimistic.
#35
Launching!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Antonio TX
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Also, that first turbo is pretty much going to bottleneck the car performance-wise, something that has always been an issue with factory twin- and twinscroll turbo setups. Just look at the stock R32-34 turbines or the Supra TT. The first thing that happens is the twins get swapped out for bigger ones or just one MASSIVE turbine.
Just something about it being only a 3.8L V6 kinda bothers me....not much room for growth there, but power is indeed coming in smaller packages these days...
#36
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No much room for growth/?? You do realize that many "smaller" engines are capable of much more power then many bigger engines right? The 3.8L V6 in the grand nationals has seen over 2000+HP....i've never even heard of an LS1/2/7 getting close to that. The RB26, 2JZ, VG30 have also all seen 1600+HP with no more then 3 liters.
yes but your making up for the lack of cubic inches with big turbos......NA its a whole different story
#37
14 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can tell you don't have a lot of experience with boosted cars. The stock turbos are not a bottle neck at all....not until you are pushing 200+ more then stock. The older GTRs and the MKIV Supra are able to go from 320HP to 480HP with just basic bolt ons....literally just intake,exhaust, and a 20 dollar boost controller can net 150+HP on those cars and many other turbo 6 cyls.
No much room for growth/?? You do realize that many "smaller" engines are capable of much more power then many bigger engines right? The 3.8L V6 in the grand nationals has seen over 2000+HP....i've never even heard of an LS1/2/7 getting close to that. The RB26, 2JZ, VG30 have also all seen 1600+HP with no more then 3 liters.
No much room for growth/?? You do realize that many "smaller" engines are capable of much more power then many bigger engines right? The 3.8L V6 in the grand nationals has seen over 2000+HP....i've never even heard of an LS1/2/7 getting close to that. The RB26, 2JZ, VG30 have also all seen 1600+HP with no more then 3 liters.
#38
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just some fyi, SP has produced a upgraded sequential system for the 2jz running 58mm turbos. They just got it running now, they are tuning it. Should it work out like they hope there will be some nice developments in the supra/2jz community. Basically you will have the lag of the 58mm turbo but power of about a 82mm size turbo. And if you seen a 58mm dyno on a supra it is actually quite good.
So maybe it wont have that powerband of the backside of a cliff
This is just FYI, nothing more.
So maybe it wont have that powerband of the backside of a cliff
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
#39
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
In fact, FI is the only way to ever get those numbers easily on any engine, even V8's...
Or are the quickest LS1's NA? Not really...
#40
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech10year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I can tell you don't have a lot of experience with boosted cars. The stock turbos are not a bottle neck at all....not until you are pushing 200+ more then stock. The older GTRs and the MKIV Supra are able to go from 320HP to 480HP with just basic bolt ons....literally just intake,exhaust, and a 20 dollar boost controller can net 150+HP on those cars and many other turbo 6 cyls.
No much room for growth/?? You do realize that many "smaller" engines are capable of much more power then many bigger engines right? The 3.8L V6 in the grand nationals has seen over 2000+HP....i've never even heard of an LS1/2/7 getting close to that. The RB26, 2JZ, VG30 have also all seen 1600+HP with no more then 3 liters.
No much room for growth/?? You do realize that many "smaller" engines are capable of much more power then many bigger engines right? The 3.8L V6 in the grand nationals has seen over 2000+HP....i've never even heard of an LS1/2/7 getting close to that. The RB26, 2JZ, VG30 have also all seen 1600+HP with no more then 3 liters.
2. An aluminum block is not designed for peak numbers... Their design focus is on weight of the block and NA power that meets emissions. That's why the C6Z06 is the king of the track for cars under $100k, so far... It's a GOOD thing they choose the weaker aluminum block, not a bad thing, e.g. LS7.
For high peak numbers like that which are only usable in drag racing, the LS1's iron cousin, the LQ4, has seen 2000hp duty without a problem and has seen 6's just like the 2JZ. RB26, etc... I don't see how they're (smaller engines) capable of much more power. They just need more boost to accomplish the same power, or ignite the same volume of air, so to speak. I do not see the superiority or any greater capability, just different engines accomplishing the same feat, mass produced blocks sustaining 2k hp... If there was a Japanese mass produced block that supported 3k hp, then there'd obviously be a superior technology to talk about!
The upper tiers of mass produced engine blocks are all amazing and neck and neck... There is no significant edge as you might seem to imply... Especially in the one area of racing, drag racing, out of the many areas...
To discuss road racing and GT racing, we'd do well to dismiss all these silly ideas of 2k hp milestones, which are nice accomplishments for the drag race teams and for the engine manufacturers, but come on...