Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Refreshed Ford Mustang News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2009, 07:48 PM
  #261  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The S2000 is a 2.0 (or 2.2) liter engine making 120hp per liter (or 109hp/liter)... the 5.0 will be making 82.4hp/liter. I hate using ricer-stats, but it shows that the Coyote probably isn't nearly as taxed as people think.
Old 12-29-2009, 07:54 AM
  #262  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LS1-450
5W-20? Wow, it will be interesting to see UOA's (used oil analysis) from an engine so tightly toleranced to be using 5W-20. Am not suggesting that results will be poor or even great, for that matter. Will just be intersting to find out.
The 99-04s use 5W20 as well.
Old 12-29-2009, 11:04 AM
  #263  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
The 99-04s use 5W20 as well.
OK, thanks. Will look for some UOA's for those model years. Even 03-04 Cobra's?
Old 12-29-2009, 11:15 AM
  #264  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
thatguy383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Fargo, ND
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lordsauran
uh why? The mustang ii's were some of the ugliest cars to ever be on the road.
x10!!!!!
Old 12-29-2009, 02:21 PM
  #265  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ke^in
The 99-04s use 5W20 as well.
So do the 05-09's.....and most likely the 2010's as well.
Old 12-29-2009, 02:58 PM
  #266  
Administrator
 
unit213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 45,841
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LS1-450
OK, thanks. Will look for some UOA's for those model years. Even 03-04 Cobra's?
Yep...even 03-04 Cobras.
Old 12-29-2009, 03:56 PM
  #267  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

OK, thanks guys. I found 5 UOA's to reference, an 05, 06,07 & (2) 08's. All were using 5W-20.

-05 had alot of track time & was higher than normal in lead. This would be expected is a result of car use while using 5W-20.
-06 was supercharged w/ alot of track use & was higher than normal in iron/copper. Again, expected as a result of the cars' use while lubed w/ 5W-20.
-07 was good w/ normal wear numbers.
(2) 08's were good w/ normal wear numbers.

Was intersting for me to see how 5W-20 is a good lubricant for these engines, on the street. The viscocity for 5W-20 is from 45-58 SUS. Rule of thumb is 65-70 SUS viscocity @ 100*C or 212*F; oil temperature (not coolant temp,) is ideal for bearing protection. Of course this is just a basic standard. Obviously, these Ford engines have tighter tolerances &/or may be designed to run cooler; maybe 160*F coolant temp? It can be seen that the track cars suffered while using 5W-20, most likely due to higher operating temperatures causing the 5W-20 to loose viscosity. Again, with higher engine temperature, reduced viscosity would occur in any engine. Always better to use a heavier weight oil for track days (when increasing engine temps above normal levels) & then drain it immediately afterward.

For reference: I have seen my oil temps reach the 280*F area when the coolant was only 215*F, while on a road course. So, coolant temperatures don't always reflect what's going on w/ the oil. Usually, oil is 20*-25*F higher than coolant temperatures under normal driving conditions. You can see the 65*F spike while on the track.

Sorry, if a little off topic. Although, it does directly relate the Mustang engine in the thread.
Old 12-29-2009, 07:03 PM
  #268  
Teching In
 
TRMach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Delaware
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I remember when I first took delivery of my Mach 1 back in 2002, we were told to run 0W-20 oil in the car! Then it became 5W-20. When I had my Ford Racing Aluminator motor installed, the Ford Racing techs told me to break it in with good old 10W-30 non synthetic fossil oil! When I asked about what to run after the break in, they said that under no circumstances to go back to 5W-20, but instead use 5W-30 full synthetic.
Old 12-30-2009, 12:04 AM
  #269  
TECH Regular
 
texas94z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Keller, Texas
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Mobil 1 has a 0w-20 synthetic oil that is very nice for low mileage Ford cars and trucks. I would trust Mobil 1 0w-20 for NA applications, not for FI or nitrous, because it is guaranteed by Exxon-Mobil.
Old 12-31-2009, 05:11 AM
  #270  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRMach1
I remember when I first took delivery of my Mach 1 back in 2002, we were told to run 0W-20 oil in the car! Then it became 5W-20. When I had my Ford Racing Aluminator motor installed, the Ford Racing techs told me to break it in with good old 10W-30 non synthetic fossil oil! When I asked about what to run after the break in, they said that under no circumstances to go back to 5W-20, but instead use 5W-30 full synthetic.
Really? I wonder why.
Old 01-18-2010, 02:10 PM
  #271  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/01/18/2...t-from-22-995/

Price information released.
Old 01-18-2010, 02:29 PM
  #272  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
bballr4567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

So Ford has been making a killing on the old models if they increased the prices by that little. Interesting for sure.
Old 01-18-2010, 03:31 PM
  #273  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That's why it was so easy to work a KILLER deal on Mustangs in past years, regardless of what the MSRPs were. It was very easy to get $4-$5k off Mustang GTs, especially when there were '04s still on the lots and the '05s were starting to come in.
Old 01-18-2010, 03:35 PM
  #274  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
bballr4567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
That's why it was so easy to work a KILLER deal on Mustangs in past years, regardless of what the MSRPs were. It was very easy to get $4-$5k off Mustang GTs, especially when there were '04s still on the lots and the '05s were starting to come in.
Thats true. I wonder what the invoice prices are. Would be interesting to see.
Old 01-18-2010, 10:07 PM
  #275  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana, USA
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And the plot thickens: Shelby is bringing back the GT350 with some heavily revised styling for the 2010+ body.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...350/index.html

Old 01-18-2010, 10:16 PM
  #276  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
bballr4567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Front looks bad but very interested to see the power numbers for that blown 5.0!
Old 01-19-2010, 03:58 AM
  #277  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ThisBlood147
And the plot thickens: Shelby is bringing back the GT350 with some heavily revised styling for the 2010+ body.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...350/index.html

That's freakin sweet.
Old 01-19-2010, 08:23 AM
  #278  
On The Tree
 
bah321's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^ that does look nice. I like it much better than the GT500.
Old 01-19-2010, 08:36 AM
  #279  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
bballr4567's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I didnt realize the price until I re-read the news post. Over $60k for the GT350. Interesting.
Old 01-19-2010, 09:44 AM
  #280  
TECH Regular
 
Ke^in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MOV
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah... I wonder what all it does have compared to the GT. I know it's more than just a body kit, blower, and exhaust,suspension upgrade.


Quick Reply: Refreshed Ford Mustang News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 PM.