Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

LS3 in a V...any problems???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2010, 06:00 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Greg, whatd it put down again? I remember you saying it ran out of fueling so it couldnt make what it should.
Old 09-08-2010, 10:02 PM
  #22  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Big Bu Bu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wait4me
We did a few drop in swaps for them, with a small cam you are at 470rwhp, it makes the car pretty fun.

You will have a lot of weird things to figure out if you do the swap yourself. But it can definatly be done.

Wow 100 rwhp gain from a small cam. I bet the guys who spent 90K on a Z06 LS7 are pissed.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-c...o-numbers.html
Old 09-08-2010, 10:07 PM
  #23  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Big Bu Bu
Wow 100 rwhp gain from a small cam. I bet the guys who spent 90K on a Z06 LS7 are pissed.

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/c6-c...o-numbers.html
Not considering you can pick up a C6 Z for 30s now and a new ls3 c6 cost more then that. Plus throw a cam in the ls7 and then talk.
Old 09-08-2010, 10:15 PM
  #24  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Big Bu Bu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itsslow98
Not considering you can pick up a C6 Z for 30s now and a new ls3 c6 cost more then that. Plus throw a cam in the ls7 and then talk.
Not trying to stir the pot and I am not calling anyone out by any means. Just can't believe the stories I hear about GM underrating motors. I am awed at the claims people make about LS3s. GM uses SAE J1349 certified power ratings. LS3s will consistently put down 370-380 at the rear wheels from what i have read. Gaining 100rwhp from a cam is about the same as a installing a FI set up. It just doesn't wash.

http://www.sae.org/certifiedpower/details.htm
Old 09-08-2010, 11:00 PM
  #25  
On The Tree
 
s-cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

the LS3 is not a hard swap from an LS2. Not sure if its a real advantage but I swapped one in for an ls6 in an 05 and it worked out well. Had its moments of frusturation but worth it. I would have just done the forged rotating assembly in an LS2 if I had an LS2 car but decided to upgrade to a forged LS3 vs building an LS6.
Old 09-08-2010, 11:43 PM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
JNR_Design's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I don't believe 100 hp from a cam; especially on how efficient these engines (LS series) already are and keep getting more so...I'm sure the LS3 is a great engine and all, but some of these claims I hear (not this, in general) are, um, wow, and this seems to be one of them.

I'd still love an LS7 under the hood of the V...hmm, maybe if I keep it long enough to blow the motor, I'll revisit that idea, lol.
Old 09-09-2010, 08:24 AM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
liqidvenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Big Bu Bu
Not trying to stir the pot and I am not calling anyone out by any means. Just can't believe the stories I hear about GM underrating motors. I am awed at the claims people make about LS3s. GM uses SAE J1349 certified power ratings. LS3s will consistently put down 370-380 at the rear wheels from what i have read. Gaining 100rwhp from a cam is about the same as a installing a FI set up. It just doesn't wash.

http://www.sae.org/certifiedpower/details.htm
w4m is saying that with a cam and normal bolt ons you can get 100rwhp out of the ls3 fairly easily.
Old 09-09-2010, 08:39 AM
  #28  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Big Bu Bu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by liqidvenom
w4m is saying that with a cam and normal bolt ons you can get 100rwhp out of the ls3 fairly easily.
That I would believe. Cam, heads, headers, intake. That's what it took to get my LS6 to gain 100rwhp.
Old 09-09-2010, 08:50 AM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
liqidvenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

you dont need heads on the ls3 to hit that mark i think.
Old 09-09-2010, 11:03 AM
  #30  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Big Bu Bu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by liqidvenom
you dont need heads on the ls3 to hit that mark i think.
Or maybe an intake since it's already a larger one.



Quick Reply: LS3 in a V...any problems???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.