FAST 102mm intake and 92mm TB... worth it?
#21
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well I don't really think heat soak would be that big of an issue considering how fast the air is moving through the intake manifold. Still... why don't we compare apples to apples instead of apples to... jet fighters.
Oh and 4door, when you factor in the sale of stock parts to compare prices why don't you do it for both.
Oh and 4door, when you factor in the sale of stock parts to compare prices why don't you do it for both.
#22
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norcross, GA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
like i said... gimme a couple of weeks and i will put the car on the dyno... ill even leave it running for the people that thinking the it being heat soaked is gonna be a big deal... and i will post the numbers on here
#23
Its already been proven multiple times that the BBK intake heat soaks at idle.....its metal, sitting on top of hot metal....by its very makeup physically it HAS to heat up more then the composite intakes. Plus it doesn't make the power that a fast will as its not that great an intake....
I even saw a few tests where the LS6 outperformed it pretty easily. Its an upgrade to the LS1 intake, but it seems a sideways step to the LS6
I even saw a few tests where the LS6 outperformed it pretty easily. Its an upgrade to the LS1 intake, but it seems a sideways step to the LS6
#24
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norcross, GA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its already been proven multiple times that the BBK intake heat soaks at idle.....its metal, sitting on top of hot metal....by its very makeup physically it HAS to heat up more then the composite intakes. Plus it doesn't make the power that a fast will as its not that great an intake....
I even saw a few tests where the LS6 outperformed it pretty easily. Its an upgrade to the LS1 intake, but it seems a sideways step to the LS6
I even saw a few tests where the LS6 outperformed it pretty easily. Its an upgrade to the LS1 intake, but it seems a sideways step to the LS6
#25
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
And you do know that nitrous backfires are fairly rare right.
I hope it works for you, but i have to agree with the above. BBK is an upgrade over the LS1 and a sidestep to the LS6.
#26
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norcross, GA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jesus if thats a reason you picked that intake it just shows your knowledge of cars. Nitrous will backfire on any intake, i guarantee you will cause more damage with a nitrous backfire in the BBK intake over an LS6. Id rather lose the 300 dollar intake then a lot more.
And you do know that nitrous backfires are fairly rare right.
I hope it works for you, but i have to agree with the above. BBK is an upgrade over the LS1 and a sidestep to the LS6.
And you do know that nitrous backfires are fairly rare right.
I hope it works for you, but i have to agree with the above. BBK is an upgrade over the LS1 and a sidestep to the LS6.
im not saying this intake is god and gonna pick me up 30rwhp... i think with the bbk ported intake, 85mm tb, slp maf, 85mm lid and a retune it will put at least another 15 to the tires and it cost me less than 100 bucks after i sold all my stock parts and i little bit of time
#28
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
nitrous back fire is not the main reason i pick this intake... i slighty out performs the ls6 with a larger throttle body... plus my bbk is ported so its gonna give it a few more hp to the tires and porting a ls6 intake will do nothing for you... im not gonna spend 1,000 dollars to pick up 10whp
im not saying this intake is god and gonna pick me up 30rwhp... i think with the bbk ported intake, 85mm tb, slp maf, 85mm lid and a retune it will put at least another 15 to the tires and it cost me less than 100 bucks after i sold all my stock parts and i little bit of time
im not saying this intake is god and gonna pick me up 30rwhp... i think with the bbk ported intake, 85mm tb, slp maf, 85mm lid and a retune it will put at least another 15 to the tires and it cost me less than 100 bucks after i sold all my stock parts and i little bit of time
#30
TECH Regular
iTrader: (39)
Well I don't really think heat soak would be that big of an issue considering how fast the air is moving through the intake manifold. Still... why don't we compare apples to apples instead of apples to... jet fighters.
Oh and 4door, when you factor in the sale of stock parts to compare prices why don't you do it for both.
Oh and 4door, when you factor in the sale of stock parts to compare prices why don't you do it for both.
#31
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the main thing is you're almost giving the impression that a bbk makes more power than a FAST, which is far from the truth. I honestly don't think a stock BBK would make any more power than an LS6. But this guy here has one that was already ported and I bet he still doesn't get much more out of it but it won't even be a fair comparison because he's changing other **** too. A used ported 90/90 would make a lot more power than that bbk and not cost too much more.
#32
On The Tree
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Norcross, GA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the main thing is you're almost giving the impression that a bbk makes more power than a FAST, which is far from the truth. I honestly don't think a stock BBK would make any more power than an LS6. But this guy here has one that was already ported and I bet he still doesn't get much more out of it but it won't even be a fair comparison because he's changing other **** too. A used ported 90/90 would make a lot more power than that bbk and not cost too much more.
#33
TECH Regular
iTrader: (39)
I think the main thing is you're almost giving the impression that a bbk makes more power than a FAST, which is far from the truth. I honestly don't think a stock BBK would make any more power than an LS6. But this guy here has one that was already ported and I bet he still doesn't get much more out of it but it won't even be a fair comparison because he's changing other **** too. A used ported 90/90 would make a lot more power than that bbk and not cost too much more.
98silvermaro has 85mm lid, 85mm maf, slp bellow, ported 85mm tb, 85mm ported bbk... its all going to flow smoothly and transition with ease and once it gets dynoed, im sure he will post up.
i know the guy has a caddy and this is a little wack, but what good is a 102 intake and tb, on an f body, and have a stock lid, stock maf, stock bellow, with stock heads, cam, and you just have headers and a tune?
the point is this whole thing was about the heat soaked 85 bbk vs an ls6 vs a 102 on a 346. a few guys were complaining and saying heat trap this, if you check out the carb set ups with the elbow with throttle bodies, they are making the best power in my opinion. there are two types of cars, dyno queens and street kings...
stock bottom end ls1 with a crap ton of nitrous are running 9s its all where you wanna spend money, and how you wanna make your power