Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

518 RWHP NA wasn't enough..... out with the old......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2012, 10:08 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
liqidvenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i like how we are now the chassis that looks down upon mid to low 11 sec v1's or any high hp v1's as being a waste...
Old 03-18-2012, 11:01 PM
  #22  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
tmonttt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm interested to see how this setup is going to fit in the engine bay! Subscribing to this thread!
Old 03-18-2012, 11:44 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
ColeGraham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Helendale
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by liqidvenom
i like how we are now the chassis that looks down upon mid to low 11 sec v1's or any high hp v1's as being a waste...
Its because if it is not done right, it is.

Look at Skydiver...even though I love his V1, and think its an absolute monster. But a bone stock V1 will run a 13.5' 1/4 with the average drive at the wheel. He easily has $30,000+ dollars in the build, and I believe his best 1/4 is 11.64. And I have seen and read about similar V1s going low 11s. It I was in my car for that much money, I would be hoping for more then 11s. 800+ hp, ~4000 pounds, and $50k should net you way more then low 11s IMO. I.E...look at the V2, weighs more but a 550 whp V2 will run in the 10s...

The flip side to that is, if you are building a street car...and I would not want more then mid (maybe high) 600s at the wheels in a street car. But that just me, since I like to be able to use first gear and not spin off my tread.
Old 03-19-2012, 12:26 AM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

^^ Stop it with all the logic and common sense Cole, that ***** not cool around here......surgarcoating everything is the preferred method.
Old 03-19-2012, 10:29 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
lollygagger8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

This is going to be badass!!

Why was the 402 tiresome to drive? Just got used to the power, or was the cam to rough or what?
Old 03-19-2012, 12:10 PM
  #26  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (40)
 
veee8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Raleigh,North Carolina
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itsslow98
Exactly, until it gets a built rear its a waste of power.
I used to have the menatlity that a cars potential is only measured in straight line performance, I have since matured.
Originally Posted by lollygagger8
This is going to be badass!!

Why was the 402 tiresome to drive? Just got used to the power, or was the cam to rough or what?
Cam was awful big for a daily driver, stuck in traffic etc... wife hated it too. Torque down low wasnt in the same zipcode as it will be with the whipple too.
Old 03-19-2012, 12:37 PM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
scatillac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ruckerville, Ky
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by veee8
Cam was awful big for a daily driver, stuck in traffic etc... wife hated it too.
That's why I went overly conservative on the cam in my V. It's more tractable as the stock LS6 was and has enough torque to make low gear completely useless at any aggressive throttle opening.

As long as I don't get below a 115* lobe center, I could probably go 6-8* more duration on the intake and 2-4* more on the exhaust before impacting driveability, but right now, with gas prices as they are, I'll be leaving it alone.

You probably remember my car. I had it (black '05) up there for the 102 throttle tune about the time you got yours back together with the LS3 heads.

What base manifold are you using with the Whipple? I thought that they only made the LS3 type.
Old 03-19-2012, 04:23 PM
  #28  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (4)
 
CancerJCC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: GA
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Amazing build sir!
Old 03-19-2012, 06:13 PM
  #29  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (40)
 
veee8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Raleigh,North Carolina
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scatillac
That's why I went overly conservative on the cam in my V. It's more tractable as the stock LS6 was and has enough torque to make low gear completely useless at any aggressive throttle opening.

As long as I don't get below a 115* lobe center, I could probably go 6-8* more duration on the intake and 2-4* more on the exhaust before impacting driveability, but right now, with gas prices as they are, I'll be leaving it alone.

You probably remember my car. I had it (black '05) up there for the 102 throttle tune about the time you got yours back together with the LS3 heads.

What base manifold are you using with the Whipple? I thought that they only made the LS3 type.
Oh I fondly remember your car! I plan to cam it quite similar to what we do in some of the V2's. With a nice wide LSA. Smooth idle and powerband is what I desire.
Old 03-19-2012, 06:28 PM
  #30  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by veee8
I used to have the menatlity that a cars potential is only measured in straight line performance, I have since matured.
LOl cause a stock rear will still be able to use 800rwhp on a road course. Uh huh.
Old 03-19-2012, 10:08 PM
  #31  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
liqidvenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by ColeGraham
Its because if it is not done right, it is.

Look at Skydiver...even though I love his V1, and think its an absolute monster. But a bone stock V1 will run a 13.5' 1/4 with the average drive at the wheel. He easily has $30,000+ dollars in the build, and I believe his best 1/4 is 11.64. And I have seen and read about similar V1s going low 11s. It I was in my car for that much money, I would be hoping for more then 11s. 800+ hp, ~4000 pounds, and $50k should net you way more then low 11s IMO. I.E...look at the V2, weighs more but a 550 whp V2 will run in the 10s...

The flip side to that is, if you are building a street car...and I would not want more then mid (maybe high) 600s at the wheels in a street car. But that just me, since I like to be able to use first gear and not spin off my tread.
Skydiver seems to be happy with his vehicle and its abilities. If he wanted something changed he could have bought a different vehicle or just changed it.

He might not be as big of drag racing as you are...there are many high hp cars (of all types) that never hit the strip. just driving from a to b might be joy enough. who knows.
Old 03-19-2012, 10:21 PM
  #32  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
ColeGraham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Helendale
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok LiquidDouche...

#1...I never questioned that Skydiver liked his car. Because I am sure he loves his car more the I do. And I think that it is a sick machine.
#2...Skydiver put a full DRAG suspension on his car, so he must be a fan of running the 1/4.
#3...Certain mods will take away the DD/point A to point B ability of a car. And 402 LS2 with all the **** he has on his car does not seem like it will be a DD ready Cadillac.
#4...I have never questioned nor told anyone how to spend their money. I stated my opinion on what the OP is doing, and how I would feel. You, what you do on forums, state opinions and give advice.
#5...You are a complete fucktard, that needs to just give up on life.



To Skydiver (if you read this), I mean no disrespect to you or you car. I was just using it as a comparive model for the OP.
To veee8, good luck with your build and my apologies for the momentary thread jack. I will be watching how this shapes up. I hope the car turns out nice at the end of the build.
Old 03-19-2012, 10:53 PM
  #33  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
wcryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Escondido CA
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Oh boy. Here we go. Subscribed
Old 03-20-2012, 08:43 AM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
lollygagger8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wcryan
Oh boy. Here we go. Subscribed
Hahhahahaa
Old 03-20-2012, 09:22 AM
  #35  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
scatillac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ruckerville, Ky
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by veee8
Oh I fondly remember your car! I plan to cam it quite similar to what we do in some of the V2's. With a nice wide LSA. Smooth idle and powerband is what I desire.
The cam in mine is an LPE custom Comp grind, 3712R-3719R-HR118.

It's 218*/232* with .595/.608 on a 118* lobe center, ground with no advance. The lift is conservative for valve spring life. I installed it with 4* of advance to pick up some low end.

It's idle characteristics are very close to the stock LS6, just a bit milder. Makes around 380 lbs/ft @ 1800 rpm and has an extremely wide torque curve, making gear selection not as critical as a more radically cammed motor. Several Mustangs have been extremely heartbroken by this.
Old 03-20-2012, 02:36 PM
  #36  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (8)
 
JJSimon904's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by veee8
I used to have the menatlity that a cars potential is only measured in straight line performance, I have since matured.


Cam was awful big for a daily driver, stuck in traffic etc... wife hated it too. Torque down low wasnt in the same zipcode as it will be with the whipple too.
I dd'd my big cam for 20k miles (mostly in traffic too..lol). 236/242 .615/.615 on 111 had zero tq down low and in some cases that made it easier to drive. When I returned the car back to stock to sell it, I forgot what it was like to have torque down low. I wound up not selling it because the motor has issues so now it sits until next summer when I hope to join the four digit hp club

The s/c will spoil you for sure.
Old 03-21-2012, 03:14 PM
  #37  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
z28dogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: tucson
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

HAHA ^ I have the same issue with torque down low, mine is running a 242/248 with a 111 lsa it is a bitch to drive in stop and go but...I love it!
Old 03-21-2012, 10:22 PM
  #38  
TECH Enthusiast
 
meatyCTS-V's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default




Just gotta say, this build is going to be disgusting.

-meaty
Old 03-22-2012, 08:29 AM
  #39  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
slowlaneblues06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Alabama
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I am curious to know if the blower will fit under the stock strut tower brace.
Old 03-22-2012, 06:12 PM
  #40  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (12)
 
scatillac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ruckerville, Ky
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slowlaneblues06
I am curious to know if the blower will fit under the stock strut tower brace.
A 112 won't fit under the strut tower brace, much less a Whipple.


Quick Reply: 518 RWHP NA wasn't enough..... out with the old......



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 PM.