Updated tune with new parts..453rwhp/436rwtq

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

05-15-2012, 12:52 PM

#21

ichpen

On The Tree

Join Date: Jan 2009

Posts: 153

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by itsslow98

Looks right around 11:1-11.2:1 to me. I would rather have it a tad rich personally. I definetly dont see "fat" on that dyno graph.

11 to 11.5 is optimum under WOT with a s/c. This is info based on talking to a few tuners by trade. Everyone has their preference, I know some folks like to run richer in the 10s.

BTW, speaking to a few shops when I was getting my engine rebuilt, running rich isn't that much safer than running leaner. Rings o'death kind of situation. Again, based on what I heard.

Reply Like

05-15-2012, 01:06 PM

#22

CTSV_510

TECH Fanatic

Thread Starter

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: West Chester, PA

Posts: 1,249

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey

Happy I could help

Thanks again!

Headed to Maple Grove on Sunday with County Corvette to try my first ever 1/4 mile runs...I'm not expecting much for my first trip to the track but hopefully I get a respectable mph.