Alignment specs for V1
#1
Alignment specs for V1
My car is finally done I'm picking it up friday. I need an alignment before I pick it up anyone have any specs they can suggest? My suspension is all stock.
I did a search btw.
I did a search btw.
Last edited by steves ls6; 06-18-2014 at 03:24 PM.
#4
Top of the list in a google search for cts-v alignment
http://www.cadillacfaq.com/faq/answers/alignment.html
http://www.cadillacfaq.com/faq/answers/alignment.html
#5
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
What are your plans for the car?
Either stock or aggressive street seems to be good for daily driving.
I have added more camber to mine but that is primarily to keep the outside edge of my autox tires from wearing out first. I don't think it is worth adding a lot of camber for a street driven car, unless you like buying tires
Either stock or aggressive street seems to be good for daily driving.
I have added more camber to mine but that is primarily to keep the outside edge of my autox tires from wearing out first. I don't think it is worth adding a lot of camber for a street driven car, unless you like buying tires
#6
With my current setup (KW's, bushings, sways) I run just over -2 degrees of camber all the way around. I was able to get over 8 degrees of caster in the front, steering is fantastic, car tracks well and the car overall feels much better. I would run 1/16" total toe in on the rear or roughly 10minutes, depending on the system. Front toe I would aim for zero or slightly outward, 1/32" total outward. I would like more camber, but it is a street car, and I hate paying for tires
#7
TECH Resident
i always liked running 0 toe all around and about -1.5* of camber all around, adding in a little more if needed to clear tires or wheels.
typically anything under -3* of camber won't affect wear too badly unless you're driving around super soft tires or driving in a straight line for the life of them. that is, if your toe is zeroed out. toe is the main reason you'll shred tires.
typically anything under -3* of camber won't affect wear too badly unless you're driving around super soft tires or driving in a straight line for the life of them. that is, if your toe is zeroed out. toe is the main reason you'll shred tires.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i always liked running 0 toe all around and about -1.5* of camber all around, adding in a little more if needed to clear tires or wheels.
typically anything under -3* of camber won't affect wear too badly unless you're driving around super soft tires or driving in a straight line for the life of them. that is, if your toe is zeroed out. toe is the main reason you'll shred tires.
typically anything under -3* of camber won't affect wear too badly unless you're driving around super soft tires or driving in a straight line for the life of them. that is, if your toe is zeroed out. toe is the main reason you'll shred tires.
#10
I told him that if I didn't get back to him by last night to just add some extra camber. Buy the time I called him this morning it was done. So I guess I'll see how it ended up.
#11
TECH Resident
i have not, i'm still on stock suspension and alignment until i can get coilovers on the car. i ran that kind of alignment on a subaru with no ill effects, but the suspension and drivetrain is completely different.
however, i wouldn't think having a 1/16" of toe all around would be bad. i don't like how the car feels with toe out in the front, too twitchy, so i prefer toe in all around to keep everything tracking straight.
i think these specs for aggressive street are a bit modest in the camber area:
i'd think bumping the front to at least -1.5* and the rear to -2.0* would be ideal. a little less toe in the rear to keep the tires from getting choppy, too.
however, i wouldn't think having a 1/16" of toe all around would be bad. i don't like how the car feels with toe out in the front, too twitchy, so i prefer toe in all around to keep everything tracking straight.
i think these specs for aggressive street are a bit modest in the camber area:
Aggressive Street Front:
-1.0 degrees negative Camber
As much Positive caster as you can get without sacrificing camber.
Neutral (0) Toe to 1/32" Toe IN Each, 1/16" Total Max. [1/32" Toe in = +0.03 deg]
Aggressive Street Rear:
-1.5 degrees Negative Camber
1/8" Toe IN Each, 1/4" Total Toe IN [1/8" Toe in = +0.12 deg]
Rear Toe should never be Toe out (negative)
-1.0 degrees negative Camber
As much Positive caster as you can get without sacrificing camber.
Neutral (0) Toe to 1/32" Toe IN Each, 1/16" Total Max. [1/32" Toe in = +0.03 deg]
Aggressive Street Rear:
-1.5 degrees Negative Camber
1/8" Toe IN Each, 1/4" Total Toe IN [1/8" Toe in = +0.12 deg]
Rear Toe should never be Toe out (negative)
#12
On The Tree
Funny to see this, I'm getting mine aligned next week and found the CTSV faq straight away.
I'm going with the track alignment, or as close as my guy can get it. Track days are hard on the outer front edges.
I'm going with the track alignment, or as close as my guy can get it. Track days are hard on the outer front edges.
#13
TECH Addict
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Where the Navy tells me to go
Posts: 2,408
Received 107 Likes
on
89 Posts
I somehow managed to pretty much destroy my front tires in the past 6000mi or so due to toe wear. I'll have to post the pics when I get home - the wear is what I'm used to seeing with toe out, but I had the car aligned with a bit of toe in just prior to putting these tires on, so I'm a bit mystified. (The tires were not new when they went on a couple/few months ago - these were the same Continental DWs I was running last year. The rears were down to the wear bars, so I bought new rears. The fronts still had plenty of good tread, and I don't recall there being any abnormal/uneven wear.) I need to get it back on an alignment rack and figure out what the story is so I don't screw up the replacement set of tires, too.
Last edited by AAIIIC; 06-23-2014 at 09:29 PM. Reason: Added picture
#14
TECH Resident
i feel like you could fit a little bigger wheel/tire with the help of camber. i know this isn't a common practice among the domestic crowd, but it's always a quick way to make things work without having to do a bunch of fender work in the process. another degree of negative camber goes a long way.
however, that being said...i probably won't need to run anything more than a typical street alignment at any point with this car since i don't track it and don't plan to run overly large wheel/tire combos.
however, that being said...i probably won't need to run anything more than a typical street alignment at any point with this car since i don't track it and don't plan to run overly large wheel/tire combos.
#17
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
Because the front tires work in unison to steer the car, toe is shared equally between them and is self centering as the car is going down the road.
This isn't the case on the rear because the tires are isolated from one another.
I can honestly say that I've aligned 1000 vehicles in my lengthy time as a mechanic and based on that, I have the following generalization about vehicle alignment.
1. Any vehicle I ever worked on that had alignment specs that varied beyond a degree from 0 camber, wore tires unevenly. This mostly applied to Porsches and Toyota MR2s but its simple physics really. If the tire isn't flat on the ground, it isn't going to wear flat. Now you may be able to mask this on the rear of a CTS-V because torque is doing most of the tire wearing and maybe I'm wrong about this particular car, but the above is an observation I've made after being forced to think about it everyday.
2. Because there is play in the vehicles suspension and steering systems, alignment specs are constantly changing in conjunction with the camber curves mentioned earlier.
What does this mean? I could align a car to one set of specs, drive it around the parking lot, re-shoot it and get something slightly different. In other words, these numbers are too precise for the real world and if I spent and hour getting your car set up to the exacting numbers I'm seeing above, I could drive up and down the road a few times and the chances are I 'd see something a little different when I put it back on the rack.
These numbers are base lines at best on a car that has rubber bushings, conventional tie rods and wheel bearing assemblies with any wear in them at all. You set it for a tiny bit of toe out and you may not be realizing that on the street unless you found the dead center of all the wear points on the suspension when you're aligning it and I've never had any luck doing that....take all this precision with a grain of salt.
Start going to Heim joints, the SKF bearings and poly bushings, you start getting a little closer to being precise but even then, without play, the suspension won't move and the steering won't steer.
3. Adjusting caster doesn't affect camber if you're doing it right.
This isn't the case on the rear because the tires are isolated from one another.
I can honestly say that I've aligned 1000 vehicles in my lengthy time as a mechanic and based on that, I have the following generalization about vehicle alignment.
1. Any vehicle I ever worked on that had alignment specs that varied beyond a degree from 0 camber, wore tires unevenly. This mostly applied to Porsches and Toyota MR2s but its simple physics really. If the tire isn't flat on the ground, it isn't going to wear flat. Now you may be able to mask this on the rear of a CTS-V because torque is doing most of the tire wearing and maybe I'm wrong about this particular car, but the above is an observation I've made after being forced to think about it everyday.
2. Because there is play in the vehicles suspension and steering systems, alignment specs are constantly changing in conjunction with the camber curves mentioned earlier.
What does this mean? I could align a car to one set of specs, drive it around the parking lot, re-shoot it and get something slightly different. In other words, these numbers are too precise for the real world and if I spent and hour getting your car set up to the exacting numbers I'm seeing above, I could drive up and down the road a few times and the chances are I 'd see something a little different when I put it back on the rack.
These numbers are base lines at best on a car that has rubber bushings, conventional tie rods and wheel bearing assemblies with any wear in them at all. You set it for a tiny bit of toe out and you may not be realizing that on the street unless you found the dead center of all the wear points on the suspension when you're aligning it and I've never had any luck doing that....take all this precision with a grain of salt.
Start going to Heim joints, the SKF bearings and poly bushings, you start getting a little closer to being precise but even then, without play, the suspension won't move and the steering won't steer.
3. Adjusting caster doesn't affect camber if you're doing it right.
#18
1. Any vehicle I ever worked on that had alignment specs that varied beyond a degree from 0 camber, wore tires unevenly. This mostly applied to Porsches and Toyota MR2s but its simple physics really. If the tire isn't flat on the ground, it isn't going to wear flat. Now you may be able to mask this on the rear of a CTS-V because torque is doing most of the tire wearing and maybe I'm wrong about this particular car, but the above is an observation I've made after being forced to think about it everyday.
With just a bit more than 1.5 degrees of camber front/rear on my last set of tires, they wore perfectly inside vs. outside edges. But I had a mix of street, autox and 1 track day which helped to even out the wear.
I've heard that R-compound tires will commonly cord the outside edge if they don't get enough negative camber. (I've read that they wear best at 2+ degrees.)