Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

Lorenzen's Progress Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2016, 07:53 PM
  #121  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
Are you running 80A, 95A, or 75D subframe bushings? Trailing arm bushings? Control arm bushings? Spring/damper rates?
I inherited the cradle bushings in a cradle I swapped out of another v1 I purchased. That v was maggied, cammed, 8.8 etc but when the oil pump/cam/lifters went out, I took that complete rear cradle assembly with the 8.8 and swapped it as a complete dropout into my 05. The maggied V powered through the wheel hop I guess as it would leave posi marks as long as I stayed in it with no problem...the 05 just doesn't have the *** to do it.

So all the suspension components are stock, the rear shocks have maybe 25k on them as factory replacements and I don't know which cradle bushings its got in it.
Old 07-01-2016, 10:18 PM
  #122  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1247
I inherited the cradle bushings in a cradle I swapped out of another v1 I purchased. That v was maggied, cammed, 8.8 etc but when the oil pump/cam/lifters went out, I took that complete rear cradle assembly with the 8.8 and swapped it as a complete dropout into my 05. The maggied V powered through the wheel hop I guess as it would leave posi marks as long as I stayed in it with no problem...the 05 just doesn't have the *** to do it.

So all the suspension components are stock, the rear shocks have maybe 25k on them as factory replacements and I don't know which cradle bushings its got in it.
I have an observation. Apologies in advance--I have no idea how to translate this to non-engineering speak:

Severe wheelhop occurs when the torque transient you're creating (by stomping on the gas) excites the natural (resonant) frequency of your rear suspension and subframe. Although your improved axles and bushings have some effect on that natural frequency, your springs and shocks (combined with the weight of your car) dominate the response.

Because your springs and shocks are super soft, the natural frequency of your rear end is very low. This puts your rear end in range of being excited when you try and accelerate. Increasing your spring rate and/or damper rate will push that natural frequency way up, higher than you can create with the gas pedal. I would focus on stiffening up the rear end and see where that takes you.
Old 07-01-2016, 10:25 PM
  #123  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
Mercier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

So stiffer springs(to dumb it down a bit)?

Why, in your opinion, was the Cobra so much better at this? I figured that was a less sophisticated platform. Or am I just remembering that platform more fondly because mine was my favorite color(comp orange)?
Old 07-02-2016, 05:31 AM
  #124  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
I have an observation. Apologies in advance--I have no idea how to translate this to non-engineering speak:

Severe wheelhop occurs when the torque transient you're creating (by stomping on the gas) excites the natural (resonant) frequency of your rear suspension and subframe. Although your improved axles and bushings have some effect on that natural frequency, your springs and shocks (combined with the weight of your car) dominate the response.

Because your springs and shocks are super soft, the natural frequency of your rear end is very low. This puts your rear end in range of being excited when you try and accelerate. Increasing your spring rate and/or damper rate will push that natural frequency way up, higher than you can create with the gas pedal. I would focus on stiffening up the rear end and see where that takes you.
I don't think I can get it much stiffer than capturing the front of the cradle and bolting it down solid. See post above for further description.

IMHO the problem is with the location of the front mounts. It's too close to the centerline of the axle and it doesn't have the leverage needed to hold the cradle firmly in place.
Old 07-02-2016, 11:05 AM
  #125  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1247
I don't think I can get it much stiffer than capturing the front of the cradle and bolting it down solid. See post above for further description.

IMHO the problem is with the location of the front mounts. It's too close to the centerline of the axle and it doesn't have the leverage needed to hold the cradle firmly in place.
But why would you do that and eliminate the noise isolation benefits provided by having a subframe, when you need to upgrade your suspension anyway?
Old 07-02-2016, 11:59 AM
  #126  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
But why would you do that and eliminate the noise isolation benefits provided by having a subframe, when you need to upgrade your suspension anyway?
Lets put it this way....

I'm a trashy 3rd gen v1 owner and can't afford to throw 3k at the car on a bunch of cool parts that will make the car handle a little better when, for 30 bucks and a days work, I can make a reasonably good attempt at stabilizing the cradle instead.

Reading the thread, you'll see I already made an under-car attempt at capturing the cradle from the front trailing arm mount and while it worked at managing wheel hop, I pulled them off due to pinion angle and ground clearance issues. While those were on the car, I didn't notice any appreciable increase in road/diff noise so I'm keeping my fingers crossed here.

I'd love to have a set of KWs but I also appreciate the self leveling feature of the factory units as I tow a motorcycle trailer, haul tools for work and, unfortunately, most of my friends weigh 250 each.
Old 07-06-2016, 10:05 PM
  #127  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
tlorenzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Space Coast Florida
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Continuing on -- I finally picked up a new air filter as the one the car came with was scareweed. I wonder if I can consider this to be a "Performance Upgrade" lmao.

Name:  20160706_203601_zpsahvfwt6n.jpg
Views: 31
Size:  319.2 KB

The Kars III Kit also came in today. Pretty excited to get this put in this weekend. I'm tired of this car feeling like a spaghetti noodle. I've yet to figure out why, but my 06 base I had was more confidence inspiring in the corners than this car is currently.

Name:  20160706_201659_zpsw75xf3np.jpg
Views: 43
Size:  267.3 KB

Any input from the peanut gallery if it's better to brace the diff with the Kars or the bmr? Both? Neither?
To me. BMR>Kars>neither>both. Reason for me is the bmr is to an existing mount the differential is already using. I don't see adding in another mount that isn't mounted the same being beneficial. Also, using both seems like one would add stress on the other. I'm open for debate on this. It's a gen4...might as well be the first to break one haha.

Last edited by tlorenzen; 07-07-2016 at 06:00 AM.
Old 07-07-2016, 07:46 AM
  #128  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

I am lookin forward to swappin the rear rubber bushin for poly.

Yes the noise level will go up, but the diff will be more planted
Old 07-07-2016, 12:29 PM
  #129  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Looks like your filter went through a similar experience to mine once. The body shop had stuck a plastic bag over the filter during some process of repair and started the car without removing it. It sucked the filter into the same shape and they replaced it.

I've recently been going through my rear suspension for the same lack of confidence that you're experiencing. The biggest improvements have been with the poly cradle and trailing arm bushings. Also make sure your bolts are tight, tight, tight. I still think one of my toe rods needs to be replaced as I'm getting a little brake shimmy from my PSR wheel. I have a set of rear upper control arms in the box that I haven't gotten around to installing yet and wish I had during the cradle bushing install since the cradle has to come down to remove them.

I also had some good improvements from the front lower control arm bushings that I replaced with Creative Steel's street hardness. I like that they're greaseable because I've had problems with squeaky poly before that was a big pain to deal with.
Old 07-07-2016, 12:45 PM
  #130  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
tlorenzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Space Coast Florida
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Interesting... I was thinking it got crushed cause the crappy k&n barrier was unbolted when I got the car. It only took me 8 months to get around to replacing it haha. Although I didn't notice any difference in power or response with the new one.

I did the Revshift 95A rear cradle bushings and they made a nice difference, but still not where I want the car to be. They also have a tendency to make popping noises. I will be going CS for the arms, toes etc. for the same reason being they're greaseable. Another maintenance item to worry about but if I can confidently take some sweepers with some bumps in them at 80 I'll be satisfied.
Old 07-07-2016, 01:48 PM
  #131  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Put a torque wrench or breaker bar on those cradle bolts. They need to be tight. I forget the specs offhand but they're somewhere around 100lb-ft I didn't get them tight enough the first time and had a similar result. Another pass of tightening made them feel much better.
Old 07-07-2016, 04:15 PM
  #132  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BudRacing
Put a torque wrench or breaker bar on those cradle bolts. They need to be tight. I forget the specs offhand but they're somewhere around 100lb-ft I didn't get them tight enough the first time and had a similar result. Another pass of tightening made them feel much better.
V1 rear subframe bolts need to be torqued to 141 ft-lbs front and 195 ft-lbs rear.

Last edited by FuzzyLog1c; 07-07-2016 at 04:34 PM.
Old 07-07-2016, 04:54 PM
  #133  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
isis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,501
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
V1 rear subframe bolts need to be torqued to 141 ft-lbs front and 195 ft-lbs rear.
Yeah those buggers gotta be tight tight tight. Popping noises are bad.
Old 07-07-2016, 05:08 PM
  #134  
Naf
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Naf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandbox, Kuwait
Posts: 1,634
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

Ya, a torque multiplier helps...
Old 07-08-2016, 09:25 AM
  #135  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
tlorenzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Space Coast Florida
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Damn, I got them about as tight as I could with my breaker bar. Didn't want to snap a bolt. I'll have to check and see if my torque wrench even goes up to 195 ft-lbs.

I will check it out this weekend when I put the Kars kit on.
Old 07-08-2016, 10:54 AM
  #136  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
Mercier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tlorenzen
Damn, I got them about as tight as I could with my breaker bar. Didn't want to snap a bolt. I'll have to check and see if my torque wrench even goes up to 195 ft-lbs.

I will check it out this weekend when I put the Kars kit on.
Most that are sold in stores don't. I finally ordered one last month but until then made heavy use of AutoZone's tool rental. They and O'Reilley typically have a 250-capable unit for rent.
Old 07-08-2016, 12:28 PM
  #137  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Do the wrenching on the cradle bolts with the wheels on the ground (or ramps). That way the cradle bushings will be settled completely as you tighten.
Old 07-08-2016, 02:30 PM
  #138  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Nice call Bud...

I'd research the pinion brace setup as I could have sworn some of them broke as many diffs as it helped. Beyond that, directly bolting the brace to the diff and then bolting it directly to the chassis of the car has the potential to be way noisy. If it were mine, i'd cut the pinion support off and then bolt it to the car.
Old 07-11-2016, 11:23 AM
  #139  
FormerVendor
 
Creative Steel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FuzzyLog1c
V1 rear subframe bolts need to be torqued to 141 ft-lbs front and 195 ft-lbs rear.
You have those backwards. 195ft/lbs Front, 140ft/lbs Rear.
Old 07-11-2016, 03:27 PM
  #140  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Creative Steel
You have those backwards. 195ft/lbs Front, 140ft/lbs Rear.
Yep, you're right. My apologies. That should make sense based on the bolt diameters: 24mm front, 21mm rear.


Quick Reply: Lorenzen's Progress Thread



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 AM.