Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

2002 Pontiac Firebird vs. 2005 CTSV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-25-2005, 05:48 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
bcrishon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2002 Pontiac Firebird vs. 2005 CTSV

In all honesty, would the Firebird even stand a chance, or would it be closer than I would think. My dad has a CTSV and a buddy has the Firebird, and they are going to line then up this weekend!! Which one will win??
Old 04-25-2005, 06:52 PM
  #2  
Launching!
 
StealthV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On a mountain with snow
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is the Firebird stock or mostly stock? If so, it doesn't have a chance.
Old 04-25-2005, 07:42 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
bcrishon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The firbird is the WS6 ??? package. It is all stock, no mods at all!!
Old 04-25-2005, 08:55 PM
  #4  
Teching In
 
2005V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The Ohio Valley
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bcrishon
The firbird is the WS6 ??? package. It is all stock, no mods at all!!
From modernracer.com:

0-¼ mile : 13.4 sec @ 106.2 mph for the 2002 WS6

I'm quoting a website (no flames please) only because I have no "real" stock time slips to compare. I'd say it will be close but I give the edge to the V with a good driver and relatively equal driver weights. The quality of the V's launch will likely be the deciding factor.

Let us know how it shakes out...
Old 04-26-2005, 06:55 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
 
CTSV05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newark, Ohio
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It should be a good race, drivers being what will determine the outcome, IMO, anyway.

Let us know, but, I would give the V an edge if the guy can launch without hoppin off the road.
Old 04-26-2005, 09:33 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Well, about ten feet behind me I have a 2000 silver, WS6. Equipped with a Pro 5.0 shifter, a K&N filter, coolant bypass, and MAC springs. In that car, at orlando speedway, on Z06 rolling stock(stock 18's and F1's) the car went 13.01 @ 107.79 launching at 2000rpm, spinning ten feet, then hookin'.

Typical CTS-V times are?.....13.20's????
Old 04-26-2005, 11:34 AM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Paul F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stock for stock it will be a good race but like everyone else said I would put my money on the V. There is about a 600 pound weight advantage for the Firebird and about a 30rwhp and much better gear advantage for the V.


.
Old 04-26-2005, 12:41 PM
  #8  
Launching!
 
TORNATIC!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Savannah, Ga
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bcrishon
In all honesty, would the Firebird even stand a chance, or would it be closer than I would think. My dad has a CTSV and a buddy has the Firebird, and they are going to line then up this weekend!! Which one will win??
The CTS-V should be slightly faster, but it's close enough that if your dad makes a mistake Those Cadillac's I heard are tricky to launch so tell your dad to race the Bird from a roll. It's the LS6 ZO6 engine vs. LS1

Let us know the outcome.
Old 04-27-2005, 08:27 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
F-Bobby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newton Ma
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

that should be a good race. definately let us know the outcome of that.
Old 04-27-2005, 03:33 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
02 wife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: DETROIT,MI
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That Ws6 should put up a good fight!
Old 04-28-2005, 09:07 PM
  #11  
TECH Regular
 
CTSV05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newark, Ohio
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wellll???!!!!........
Old 05-04-2005, 12:22 PM
  #12  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
formula87350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think the V will win against a stock WS6. I raced a V on Monday from 40-70 (very short race) and I pulled maybe an inch or two just before redline. He sounded and looked stock but I don't know for sure. Needless to say I was very impressed and gave the guy a thumbs up and he turned off.
Old 05-04-2005, 12:54 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
bcrishon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I will let you all know ASAP when they line up. There are supposed to this weekend!!
Old 05-06-2005, 07:55 AM
  #14  
TECH Regular
 
CTSV05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Newark, Ohio
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Still Waiting............LOL!
Old 05-07-2005, 09:40 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (16)
 
Parker TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas/Denton/Houston
Posts: 2,645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Im awaiting the outcome too!
Old 05-07-2005, 10:05 AM
  #16  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 32,987
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

depends on the driver. I took my stock orange 99 SS out to the track a few weeks ago and busted off a 12.84 @ 104 with a 6-speed, on regular tires. So, stock f-bodies 'can' run 12s when driven properly. Not sure about the CTS-V, who has gone the quickest in a stock one so far?
Old 05-07-2005, 03:57 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
 
cvp33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Quickest stock so far was 13.0X at 109 + I believe.

Quickest Maggied was 12.7X at 113 + I believe.

60 foot times suck for the V, but hooking up is even more scary with our weak diff's.
Old 05-08-2005, 11:26 AM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
02SOMWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wallkill ,NY
Posts: 2,638
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'll put my 02 WS6 up against it .....LOL :jest I think it will come down to driving skills
Old 05-08-2005, 07:03 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
00firebird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

0-60 and 1/4

2000 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am (WS6) 4.9 13.4

2004 Cadillac CTS-V 5.1 13.4

the trans am should win lower end, it all depends on the driver.
Old 05-08-2005, 08:06 PM
  #20  
Launching!
 
StealthV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: On a mountain with snow
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Properly powershifted, a V owner did 0-60 in 4.7 (Cadillac says 4.6)

Real world granny shifting = 5.1





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.