I got beat :(
09-15-2008, 06:32 PM
#21
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Front of You/Broward County, FL
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The C6Z will go 0-100 in under 8 seconds, 0-120 in under 11 seconds, you must have a non-stock rear and over 500RWHP, as you are giving up over 700lbs.
The 2008 Snake is even faster, according to the mags:
Performance (2008 base model):
Dodge Viper fourth generation
0-60 mph (96km/h):3.5 sec
0-100 mph (160km/h):7.6 sec
quarter mile: 11.5 sec @ 129 mph (208 km/h)
top speed: 203 mph (327 km/h)
slalom: 70 mph (113 km/h)+
skidpad average acceleration: 1.06 g (10.4 m/s²)
100-0 mph: 270 ft (82 m)
09-15-2008, 06:36 PM
#22
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Front of You/Broward County, FL
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No one mentioned from a roll, I stated based on a race, which unless any conditions are provided, assumes a drag race. From a roll is very subjective, as in our Vs we would like to go from 40, 65 and 95mph, given the gearing. I love my V, love my power, but I have yet to be able to use it 100% with confidence, and if you have yet to break a diff, you will not consider its limitations in a race.
09-15-2008, 07:22 PM
#23
from a roll a stock c5z06 has zero chance against a maggied V. From a dig,we all know our cars SUCK no matter whose behind the wheel, our cars werent made to be fast from a stop, we all know that, lets put it aside, and not harp on races that poke at our major weakness.
I refuse to race ppl from a dig on the street. Traction is dangerous...and in addition I know I will lose, and it doesnt exhibit the cars true potential
I refuse to race ppl from a dig on the street. Traction is dangerous...and in addition I know I will lose, and it doesnt exhibit the cars true potential
09-15-2008, 10:07 PM
#24
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wash., DC / Kabul, Afghanistan
Posts: 716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
09-15-2008, 10:48 PM
#25
But from a roll they should be close. Look at the trap speeds for both cars and you will see they are in the 117 mph range give or take a few clicks.
09-15-2008, 10:59 PM
#26
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Front of You/Broward County, FL
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Again, driver's race, it is definitely not a guaranteed win for the V. We can bench race all day on the forum, someone with a 450-470RWHP V needs to set this up and tape it. A word of caution for the V owner, hard shifts at 6,600rpms will also grenade your diff, not just wheel-hopping launches. I know this as a fact,,,
BTW, make sure the C5Z does not have a tune, as this gets 'em another 20RWHP. For those willing to do this, post on the Vette section, I am sure you will have some takers, provided you can find a few non-modded Zs.
BTW, make sure the C5Z does not have a tune, as this gets 'em another 20RWHP. For those willing to do this, post on the Vette section, I am sure you will have some takers, provided you can find a few non-modded Zs.
09-16-2008, 02:59 AM
#27
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: DFW
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What are your mods?
The C6Z will go 0-100 in under 8 seconds, 0-120 in under 11 seconds, you must have a non-stock rear and over 500RWHP, as you are giving up over 700lbs.
The 2008 Snake is even faster, according to the mags:
Performance (2008 base model):
Dodge Viper fourth generation
0-60 mph (96km/h):3.5 sec
0-100 mph (160km/h):7.6 sec
quarter mile: 11.5 sec @ 129 mph (208 km/h)
top speed: 203 mph (327 km/h)
slalom: 70 mph (113 km/h)+
skidpad average acceleration: 1.06 g (10.4 m/s²)
100-0 mph: 270 ft (82 m)
The C6Z will go 0-100 in under 8 seconds, 0-120 in under 11 seconds, you must have a non-stock rear and over 500RWHP, as you are giving up over 700lbs.
The 2008 Snake is even faster, according to the mags:
Performance (2008 base model):
Dodge Viper fourth generation
0-60 mph (96km/h):3.5 sec
0-100 mph (160km/h):7.6 sec
quarter mile: 11.5 sec @ 129 mph (208 km/h)
top speed: 203 mph (327 km/h)
slalom: 70 mph (113 km/h)+
skidpad average acceleration: 1.06 g (10.4 m/s²)
100-0 mph: 270 ft (82 m)
Now goin with a fogger and more nitrous. But yeah make pretty short work of the 08 vipers. A few friends have them.
http://s178.photobucket.com/albums/w...0830234552.flv
thats me on 1 kit
Last edited by y2kfrc; 09-16-2008 at 03:05 AM.
09-16-2008, 07:43 AM
#28
Launching!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: OHIO
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=onebadcad;10111060]...
Stock C6Z>any CTS-V (except maybe Bob's), 550RHWP V still gets annihilated
Nice your giving centrifugals the nudge.
Onebadcad said these are from a gig, not roll on.
Stock C6Z>any CTS-V (except maybe Bob's), 550RHWP V still gets annihilated
Nice your giving centrifugals the nudge.
Onebadcad said these are from a gig, not roll on.
09-16-2008, 08:37 AM
#29
This should end all the discussions regarding who is faster, from a dig:
Moped>Skateboard, even with fat GF on back
Taco Bell>McDonalds, in race to the bathroom due to 'the runs'
Fake *****>Droppy Pancakes, more expensive but worth it
Wife w/paycheck>Girlfriend w/o job, unless GF is smokin' hot
USC>Miami Dolphins, painful but damn true
Okay, now to the car stuff:
CTS-V w/LS6>CTS-V w/LS2, not really, but who really wants this battle to end
Stock C5Z>Stock CTS-V, unless Grandma is shifting Vette
Maggie CTS-V, 470RHWP=Stock C5Z, driver's race, and by the way, not too many Stock C5Zs on the road
C5Z with added 40-60RWHP bolt-ons>CTS-V w/Maggie
Stock C6Z>any CTS-V (except maybe Bob's), 550RHWP V still gets annihilated
Onebadcad's C6>Stock C6Z, and I paid $45K less
JDogg/V-Series Tech C5Z>Onebadcad's C6, but only 'cause I let him
ZR1>than everything on the planet, except this:
Moped>Skateboard, even with fat GF on back
Taco Bell>McDonalds, in race to the bathroom due to 'the runs'
Fake *****>Droppy Pancakes, more expensive but worth it
Wife w/paycheck>Girlfriend w/o job, unless GF is smokin' hot
USC>Miami Dolphins, painful but damn true
Okay, now to the car stuff:
CTS-V w/LS6>CTS-V w/LS2, not really, but who really wants this battle to end
Stock C5Z>Stock CTS-V, unless Grandma is shifting Vette
Maggie CTS-V, 470RHWP=Stock C5Z, driver's race, and by the way, not too many Stock C5Zs on the road
C5Z with added 40-60RWHP bolt-ons>CTS-V w/Maggie
Stock C6Z>any CTS-V (except maybe Bob's), 550RHWP V still gets annihilated
Onebadcad's C6>Stock C6Z, and I paid $45K less
JDogg/V-Series Tech C5Z>Onebadcad's C6, but only 'cause I let him
ZR1>than everything on the planet, except this:
I always get a good laugh from you! Along with valuable input
09-16-2008, 01:16 PM
#30
BTW, make sure the C5Z does not have a tune, as this gets 'em another 20RWHP.
09-16-2008, 02:03 PM
#32
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's when the conversation got into "What does it take to run with/beat a ____", that a "Maggied V" became more or less a measuring cup for comparison purposes.
all over that Z. rumor has it, 7psi and 5xxrwhp.
12-24-2008, 04:35 PM
#37
On The Tree
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Iberia La.
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
killed a c5 z06 with cat back and tune easy and all i have is a maggie we went from a 20 roll only once as he did not want to race again so any one who cant beat a stock c5 z06 with a maggied V is doing something wrong
12-28-2008, 04:20 AM
#38
let me sum it up for the slow people in the audiance C5 Zo6 w/ 390RWHP @ lets say 3300lbs Vs. 04 CTS V with 414RWHP @ 4240 um yeah do the math...
12-28-2008, 01:56 PM
#40
yeah and they 
me I didnt give a rats a$$ about a maggie I think there a joke and wouldnt put one in my car. So for them to compare a supercharged car putting very little down over my heads and cam why would I?? I was trying to get some insight about the C5 but it seems to be a freak putting down 390 with cold air kit
me I didnt give a rats a$$ about a maggie I think there a joke and wouldnt put one in my car. So for them to compare a supercharged car putting very little down over my heads and cam why would I?? I was trying to get some insight about the C5 but it seems to be a freak putting down 390 with cold air kit 