Carbureted LSX Forum Carburetors | Carbed Intakes | Carb Tuning Tips for LSX Enthusiasts

where should I set the rev limiter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2012, 01:10 AM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
billyflantos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DAVIDSON NC
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

when i ran 26" tires and a 4.10 gear i use to cross the line at 7400 in the qtr with a stock bottom end motor...and yes,i was gritting my teeth the whole time.
Old 04-03-2012, 05:33 AM
  #22  
Teching In
 
bttlfed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: IL
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Pop N Wood
How many people really run them that high with a stock bottom end?

I keep seeing these numbers from Zones but man, that sure is a lot higher than GM set them from the factory. That is higher then they set the LS7 motors.
I have my limited set to 7400. I see 7-7200 everytime at the track. This is on a stock bottom end minus arp rod bolts. I literally flipped the motor over and put the rod bolts in the day I got it from the scrapyard.
Old 04-03-2012, 11:28 AM
  #23  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 68 Likes on 39 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

My rev limiter is at 6800 on a stock LQ9 bottom end. It used to be at 6600, but even with my small cam it wanted more rpm.
Old 04-03-2012, 01:40 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
GC99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central VA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
My rev limiter is at 6800 on a stock LQ9 bottom end. It used to be at 6600, but even with my small cam it wanted more rpm.
If your limiter is at 6800, where are you shifting it? 6700ish? Just for grins I would try shifting it at 7000 at least once at the track. I say this because your relatively tight converter is probably going to be much more sensative to shift RPM (tight converter affecting how far back it drops in RPM between shifts) than a much looser converter would be. So even if power is starting to drop off by 7K with your smaller cam, the time you spend at that high RPM is much shorter than the time you spend climbing back up into power. Just my $.02. What do you think?
Old 04-03-2012, 03:38 PM
  #25  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 68 Likes on 39 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by GC99TA
Just for grins I would try shifting it at 7000
You are a bad influence.........
Old 04-03-2012, 03:43 PM
  #26  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
GC99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central VA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
You are a bad influence.........
I do what I can......

Now go spin that bitch to the moon and report back..........
Old 04-03-2012, 03:54 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (30)
 
GC99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central VA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I guess I should also add a little evidence for context. For what it's worth, on my particular combo in my Camaro, a 7200RPM shift was worth a .5mph gain over my typical 7000RPM shifts and a 6800 shift was worth a .5mph loss. So over all, a gain of 1 full mph in shifting at 7200 vs. 6800. Granted......this was just my combo, but I suspect my 8 inch 5000 stall converter isn't nearly as shift-RPM sensative as a tighter converter would be. For example, if I had a 3000 stall in this car, I think the gains/losses would have been mulitplied. I see this all the time with my six-speed car since it has a further "climb", if you will, to recover back into maximum power. Again, this window of best average power will be different with each combo and centered mostly around the camshaft profile, but it's probably still a safe generalization to say that these are high RPM oriented motors in most cases.

Last edited by GC99TA; 04-03-2012 at 04:02 PM.
Old 04-03-2012, 05:30 PM
  #28  
In-Zane Moderator
iTrader: (25)
 
ZONES89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 11,939
Received 32 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

Absolutely, great to have some technical data, it is another statement further backing that a automatic will usually be a significant amount of ET gain with the right converter ect.
Old 04-03-2012, 06:52 PM
  #29  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
S10xGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Neches, TX
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 3pedals
my current engine setup : hydraulic , oem lifters
https://ls1tech.com/forums/carburete...gine-dyno.html
Thanks for the refresher, still cannot believe the power from that combo, I hope it stays together!

Originally Posted by tommy396
Hey S-10, I think you were asking me? I don't know what lifters they are, I bought the long block already finished from a friend. It's an 02 ls-1 w/ TEA stage 1.5 heads off a 5.3 & a Predator Z cam Hydraulic roller. 230/230 612/591 111+2 on a 109 ICL. Vic Jr w/ a Holley 750 DP.
Tommy, the purpose of the quote button is so peeps know who we are replying to, hence the quote block from 3pedals...
Old 04-03-2012, 08:00 PM
  #30  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
tommy396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S10xGN
Thanks for the refresher, still cannot believe the power from that combo, I hope it stays together!



Tommy, the purpose of the quote button is so peeps know who we are replying to, hence the quote block from 3pedals...
Thanks S-10, I never picked up on that!



Quick Reply: where should I set the rev limiter?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:40 PM.