4U2BNVS

iTrader: (2)

I went 13.1@107.9 with my bonestock 99 z28 with stock airfilter and the factory JUNK i repeat JUNK Goodyears. The DA was 5800 ft and track temp was 112 degress which is not worth a ****. I believe it could've gone 12's with better air and a cooler day.

qwk93ta

iTrader: (13)

M6? What was your 60'?

PIZDETS

iTrader: (10)

How bad did he pull you? From the launch? 8.2 is awesome for that brick

davered00ss

iTrader: (4)

Evan Smith ran a 99 or 00 SS to 12.8 stock in an article of GMHTP.

davered00ss

iTrader: (4)

This SS only had Drag radials. Driver's first track time ever.
http://s93.photobucket.com/albums/l7...t=mevsdave.flv

MethosZ28

I just got my 2002 Z28 bone stock. Last weekend it ran a 13.06 in the 1/4 mile. Works for me

DavidGarcia

I have a stock 99 T/A with a auto trans and I took it to the track last week and it ran a 14.2 all night with a 2.2 60ft. I did have a check engine light on for low knock sensor voltage. Do you think that could cause it to run that slow or do I have another problem I don't know about. I changed the knock sensors already but no change.

ZTwentyAteU

iTrader: (12)

I had a 01 ss with stock everything that ran 12.98@107 in 2004ish. I did cut the airbox out on the bottom and thats it. a4 car

theres plenty out there that can run 8.40s-8.50s 1/8 on a cold night stock.

tsteel1

My 99 z28 bone stock with factory air cleaner converters and all. After 4 weekends of getting the the car to hook the best I could, on the 245s and it is a A4 I went from 14.14 at 100 mph to a 13.93 102 mph 60 ft fom 2.3 to 2.0now with tsp true duels long tubes and 2800 hundred stall and bbk intake and tb it runs 12.84 at a 107 mph same 2.0s 60ft but spins a bunch, have a buddy with ws6 all stock accept for magnaflow catback and ory doing 13.70 with 1.9 60s and its a m6, and also mine has a 323 gear and this is in Cincinnati Ohio at edgewater at that track Ive never seen a truly stock fbody run 12s but it may be different in other parts of the country .

camw601

anyone know the time difference between a stock 2000 ls1 A4 with 2.73s than those with 3.23s?

Jassick

iTrader: (1)

guess these cars are getting faster as they get older. I remember on here a few years back they were a solid low to mid 13 second car. regardless of stock trim. do remember hearing the m6's were a smidgin' faster than a4's. also remember that magazine article floating around to prove to all the mustang guys we were in the 12's stock.

does seem the ls1 f-body has managed to shave a few tenths off it's average time since then.

tsteel1

Id have to see it with my own eyes to beleave it, what i mean is all stock no exhaust upgrades no tire size changes no free mods the way it came factory I know these cars our fast with upgrades ive seen them with just converters removed the free mods done and drag radials running high 12s Im 46 years old been going to the track sence I was 16 have seen alot of these cars in so called stock form Ive even raced at least 50 of them at the track had no problem keeping my own with other stock ones evan at my 13.92

blue rocket

The 4th gen ss camaros run between 13.2 to 13.6 at 104 to 108 mph on average. The 5th gen ss camaros run between 12.98 to 13.5 at 106 to 111 mph on average.

hwcoll95

iTrader: (1)

only have 1/8 local,with 235/55 street tires,no burnout my ls1 m6 still hasn't run in the 8s,9.13 and 9.17 at 84mph are the best times,keep thinkin' cut a good light and 8 is there

Speedy1990

I finally broke down and took my '02 Z28 to my local 1/8th mile tonight. A4, 3:23s, Fram air filter, SLP MAF/SLP Lid, 17-inch SS wheels with 275 Pirellis, 131,000 miles. I only made four passes, none with burnouts. First pass was an 8.887 @ 83.79 MPH w/2.241 60-ft. Fourth and final pass was an 8.768 @ 84.55 MPH w/2.216 60-ft. If I can get my 60-ft. times down just in the 2.1XX or 2.0XX range, anywhere between 8.60s-8.40s should easily be within reach for my car.

Surprisingly, this was also my very first time racing at a track, too...

RPM WS6

iTrader: (3)

I know this is an old post in an old thread, but I have to disagree with part of it. I've personally seen a stock '99 SS A4 run 13.1x and a stock '02 WS6 A4 run a 12.98, this was back in the early 2000s. The quickest of the A4s can certainly do better than mid 13s in the right conditions with a driver that knows how to launch them (yes, getting the best possibile launch still takes a bit of skill even with an A4 ).

I agree that with the best possibile car, under the best possibile conditions, with the best possibile driver, the M6 version will be a bit quicker and certainly faster in trap speed. But both trans types are generally mid 13 second cars in average conditions with an average driver, and the very quickest stock A4 cars (as well as M6 cars) have certainly done better than mid 13s.

It was a '99 Z28 that went 12.89 @108, and here is an article that refers to that car and pass, as well as an '02 SS that had bests of 12.96 and 108.7mph in two different passes in less than ideal conditions:

demonspeed

iTrader: (7)

^^^ I still have that MM&FF issue. It was when they were testing the new-for-2001 Bullitt. Little did we know that in two years the Cobra would be terrorizing the streets.

JDEP162

the awsome part of all this, is the times were debating about are faster than mustangs of previous years, equivalent years, and later years. ok ok maybe not the roush stage 3 blah blah's.. but the ones we see everyday..smoked. and i love knowing that the guys in the 25,000$ newer mustangs are behind my 6,000$ camaro at the finish line lol. and somewhere in a distant 3rd are the 20,000 vtecs lol.

S_Sprouse

mine stock now as of last friday at little river dragway ...

run 1: test n tune-reaction-.4398..60ft-2.1222..330ft-5.8547..1/8et-8.9088 @ 81.34..1/4et-13.6996 @ 101.28

run 2: test n tune-reaction-.2735..60ft-2.1428..330ft-5.8605..1/8et-8.9080 @ 81.49..14et-13.6919 @ 101.47

random-strike

Ran 8.3 in 1/8 and 13.2 in 1/4