b4c camaro
08-16-2005, 10:42 PM
#21
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you could get a Z28 with 3.23s
A4 B4Cs all have 3.23s though
he was saying that there is no such thing as an "SS" motor... there are just LS1s...no diffrences...
A4 B4Cs all have 3.23s though
he was saying that there is no such thing as an "SS" motor... there are just LS1s...no diffrences...
08-17-2005, 09:34 PM
#23
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A B4C Camaro has nothing on it that would make the car any faster. The only difference is it has a heavy duty alternator, deleted Z28 emblems, 1LE lower control arms, standard 3.23s on A4 cars and standard Goodyear Eagle RSA tires. I have driven a stock 200 mile M6 2002 B4C and it was no faster than any stock ls1 car i've driven. I've also seen a bone stock 2002 A4 B4C run 13.50s@102 at my local track, not really nothing out of the ordinary. From my personal experience LS1 cars vary greatly on the RWHP numbers they put out.
Last edited by 2002LS1Z; 08-17-2005 at 09:40 PM.
08-19-2005, 05:15 PM
#25
TECH Enthusiast
I've seen the 1LE lower control arm claim several times across the net. I know for certain that it's not part of the B4C package itself, but maybe it's covered by another code sometimes found on B4C's. The info I have on RPO codes is too vague to know.
09-05-2005, 04:31 PM
#29
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by road_rage187
i dont know if it was really faster than my 99 but is really does seem faster, do u think i got hurt on it, i paid 7800 for it and it had hundred and 9 thousand miles
I hope you are a either a VERY good mechanic or really lucky with cars because ALL cars will break down if beat on for a while.
