What will it take for a LS1 Camaro to run 200 mph??
02-10-2007, 08:16 PM
#101
Well, stock I did 327 rwhp 337 rwtq,
did a 13.2 @108 with the stock tires with a M6
If I had another day at the track and line lock to do a real
burnout I think I could have got 12.9. 1/2 hour before that
it did about 165 on the way to the track chasing my bro in
his vett. My bro's vet has a 200mph speedo, mine was pegged.
The day before that I drove it from NJ to FLA 22 hrs
straight getting 31mpg. I don't care If any one believes all
that. That tells me the ls1 f body are allot of car for the
money. (and I'm glad I have one) -Felt good at top speep.
did a 13.2 @108 with the stock tires with a M6
If I had another day at the track and line lock to do a real
burnout I think I could have got 12.9. 1/2 hour before that
it did about 165 on the way to the track chasing my bro in
his vett. My bro's vet has a 200mph speedo, mine was pegged.
The day before that I drove it from NJ to FLA 22 hrs
straight getting 31mpg. I don't care If any one believes all
that. That tells me the ls1 f body are allot of car for the
money. (and I'm glad I have one) -Felt good at top speep.
02-14-2007, 11:51 AM
#102
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Steel City
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i had my 02 WS6 M6, stock, bury the speedo. On a 3/4 mile stretch. With the T-Tops out and windows down. The car was just about ready to shake itself apart, after i hit an expansion joint, so i lifted.
BTW, i was halfway through 6th gear, WOT.
BTW, i was halfway through 6th gear, WOT.
Last edited by AeroKing; 02-14-2007 at 12:03 PM.
02-14-2007, 05:28 PM
#103
Originally Posted by TTSSZ
Well, stock I did 327 rwhp 337 rwtq,
did a 13.2 @108 with the stock tires with a M6
If I had another day at the track and line lock to do a real
burnout I think I could have got 12.9. 1/2 hour before that
it did about 165 on the way to the track chasing my bro in
his vett. My bro's vet has a 200mph speedo, mine was pegged.
The day before that I drove it from NJ to FLA 22 hrs
straight getting 31mpg. I don't care If any one believes all
that. That tells me the ls1 f body are allot of car for the
money. (and I'm glad I have one) -Felt good at top speep.
did a 13.2 @108 with the stock tires with a M6
If I had another day at the track and line lock to do a real
burnout I think I could have got 12.9. 1/2 hour before that
it did about 165 on the way to the track chasing my bro in
his vett. My bro's vet has a 200mph speedo, mine was pegged.
The day before that I drove it from NJ to FLA 22 hrs
straight getting 31mpg. I don't care If any one believes all
that. That tells me the ls1 f body are allot of car for the
money. (and I'm glad I have one) -Felt good at top speep.
Your LS1 sits stock at 327 rwhp 337 rwtq? Is that with the transmission, driveshaft, and axle disconnected or something?
Yet you only do a 13.2 at 108? You can get a 13.2 with 300 rwhp flat. Hell an A4 1999 model gets a 13.5 stock and the M6 models in 1999 were dyno'ing 298-299 rwhp stock.
You can't be getting 327 rwhp stock that car would be a factory freak if you did.
02-14-2007, 09:32 PM
#104
Yep that's all I could get out of it. Was with a m6 at moroso
with stock tires, temp about 90 deg.
Dyno was with the stock air box off.
The 02's were pumped up a bit from the factory. I think you
will find many 02's with the 345 package doing 330/340.
I think with another day at the track I could have done
12.9. 60's were only 2.0. I could not get the tires hot
enough without line lock, and did not know how to power
brake it with the m6.
In fact, the first ls1 I ever saw on the dyno was a 345 hp
package white 02
SS. It was right after we took my 71 big block off the
rollers. It was very painful to here it was stock... it did
330rwhp. My 427 only did 350rwhp/390rwtq. It was then I
learned to respect the mighty ls1's.
I ordered one about a week or 2 later.
As for 13.2, the list of stock cars that can do low 13's
right out of the box with a first time at the track driver
is very short....
with stock tires, temp about 90 deg.
Dyno was with the stock air box off.
The 02's were pumped up a bit from the factory. I think you
will find many 02's with the 345 package doing 330/340.
I think with another day at the track I could have done
12.9. 60's were only 2.0. I could not get the tires hot
enough without line lock, and did not know how to power
brake it with the m6.
In fact, the first ls1 I ever saw on the dyno was a 345 hp
package white 02
SS. It was right after we took my 71 big block off the
rollers. It was very painful to here it was stock... it did
330rwhp. My 427 only did 350rwhp/390rwtq. It was then I
learned to respect the mighty ls1's.
I ordered one about a week or 2 later.
As for 13.2, the list of stock cars that can do low 13's
right out of the box with a first time at the track driver
is very short....
Originally Posted by Genesis_26317
Your LS1 sits stock at 327 rwhp 337 rwtq? Is that with the transmission, driveshaft, and axle disconnected or something?
Yet you only do a 13.2 at 108? You can get a 13.2 with 300 rwhp flat. Hell an A4 1999 model gets a 13.5 stock and the M6 models in 1999 were dyno'ing 298-299 rwhp stock.
You can't be getting 327 rwhp stock that car would be a factory freak if you did.
Yet you only do a 13.2 at 108? You can get a 13.2 with 300 rwhp flat. Hell an A4 1999 model gets a 13.5 stock and the M6 models in 1999 were dyno'ing 298-299 rwhp stock.
You can't be getting 327 rwhp stock that car would be a factory freak if you did.
02-15-2007, 10:14 AM
#105
Originally Posted by TTSSZ
Yep that's all I could get out of it. Was with a m6 at moroso
with stock tires, temp about 90 deg.
Dyno was with the stock air box off.
The 02's were pumped up a bit from the factory. I think you
will find many 02's with the 345 package doing 330/340.
I think with another day at the track I could have done
12.9. 60's were only 2.0. I could not get the tires hot
enough without line lock, and did not know how to power
brake it with the m6.
In fact, the first ls1 I ever saw on the dyno was a 345 hp
package white 02
SS. It was right after we took my 71 big block off the
rollers. It was very painful to here it was stock... it did
330rwhp. My 427 only did 350rwhp/390rwtq. It was then I
learned to respect the mighty ls1's.
I ordered one about a week or 2 later.
As for 13.2, the list of stock cars that can do low 13's
right out of the box with a first time at the track driver
is very short....
with stock tires, temp about 90 deg.
Dyno was with the stock air box off.
The 02's were pumped up a bit from the factory. I think you
will find many 02's with the 345 package doing 330/340.
I think with another day at the track I could have done
12.9. 60's were only 2.0. I could not get the tires hot
enough without line lock, and did not know how to power
brake it with the m6.
In fact, the first ls1 I ever saw on the dyno was a 345 hp
package white 02
SS. It was right after we took my 71 big block off the
rollers. It was very painful to here it was stock... it did
330rwhp. My 427 only did 350rwhp/390rwtq. It was then I
learned to respect the mighty ls1's.
I ordered one about a week or 2 later.
As for 13.2, the list of stock cars that can do low 13's
right out of the box with a first time at the track driver
is very short....
Okay you had the 345 hp package I forgot that they made those, you had exhaust covered right out of the box. I thought you were getting an overgrown ego over there.
You think that 427 doing 350/hp 390 ft/lbs is bad try a 455 with only 255 hp at the crank and a 301 with only 135 peak hp. That's 2 peak hp less than a Civic.
02-23-2007, 09:44 PM
#106
Originally Posted by Genesis_26317
Your LS1 sits stock at 327 rwhp 337 rwtq? Is that with the transmission, driveshaft, and axle disconnected or something?
Yet you only do a 13.2 at 108? You can get a 13.2 with 300 rwhp flat. Hell an A4 1999 model gets a 13.5 stock and the M6 models in 1999 were dyno'ing 298-299 rwhp stock.
You can't be getting 327 rwhp stock that car would be a factory freak if you did.
Yet you only do a 13.2 at 108? You can get a 13.2 with 300 rwhp flat. Hell an A4 1999 model gets a 13.5 stock and the M6 models in 1999 were dyno'ing 298-299 rwhp stock.
You can't be getting 327 rwhp stock that car would be a factory freak if you did.
I dynoed 339/356 at the rear wheels with just a hooker CB and a lid. NEdyno day in October '03. I have the graph, and half of the Eastern section saw it. The '01/'02 cars make more power, you know that right? Better flowing stock headers, different cam (actually a bit smaller duration/lift wise, lower LSA) , LS6 intake...
I've run 12.8 @ 113.
Regardless, a stock 330rwhp-ish f-body with the governor turned off will run right in the area of 170-175.
You're ignoring all the previous proof I provided in this thread. IN VIDEO FORM.
I still don't understand all this arguing.
Originally Posted by AeroKing
i had my 02 WS6 M6, stock, bury the speedo. On a 3/4 mile stretch. With the T-Tops out and windows down. The car was just about ready to shake itself apart, after i hit an expansion joint, so i lifted.
BTW, i was halfway through 6th gear, WOT.
BTW, i was halfway through 6th gear, WOT.
I've done 163 in 5th gear off the limiter, back up, then off the limiter again.
Last edited by BAD ASS TA WS6; 02-23-2007 at 09:56 PM.
02-23-2007, 10:35 PM
#107
Originally Posted by BAD *** TA WS6
BS.
I dynoed 339/356 at the rear wheels with just a hooker CB and a lid. NEdyno day in October '03. I have the graph, and half of the Eastern section saw it. The '01/'02 cars make more power, you know that right? Better flowing stock headers, different cam (actually a bit smaller duration/lift wise, lower LSA) , LS6 intake...
I've run 12.8 @ 113.
Regardless, a stock 330rwhp-ish f-body with the governor turned off will run right in the area of 170-175.
I dynoed 339/356 at the rear wheels with just a hooker CB and a lid. NEdyno day in October '03. I have the graph, and half of the Eastern section saw it. The '01/'02 cars make more power, you know that right? Better flowing stock headers, different cam (actually a bit smaller duration/lift wise, lower LSA) , LS6 intake...
I've run 12.8 @ 113.
Regardless, a stock 330rwhp-ish f-body with the governor turned off will run right in the area of 170-175.
That and a stock F-body going 170-175 would make it faster than the (video now down) C5 going 172 below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxpdSukuEY8
02-23-2007, 11:27 PM
#108
((((((Administrator))))))
Originally Posted by Genesis_26317
Did you have that dyno tuned as well? Besides intake and exhaust are significant bolt-ons for a LS1. They are regularly dynoed at 298-310 stock rwhp depending on year.
That and a stock F-body going 170-175 would make it faster than the (video now down) C5 going 172 below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxpdSukuEY8
That and a stock F-body going 170-175 would make it faster than the (video now down) C5 going 172 below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxpdSukuEY8
http://www.fquick.com/garages/viewvehicle.php?id=287
Thats the car, and here he dyno'ed 330rwhp with JUST a lid:
Peace,
Craig.
02-24-2007, 12:35 AM
#109
Originally Posted by Genesis_26317
Did you have that dyno tuned as well? Besides intake and exhaust are significant bolt-ons for a LS1. They are regularly dynoed at 298-310 stock rwhp depending on year.
That and a stock F-body going 170-175 would make it faster than the (video now down) C5 going 172 below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxpdSukuEY8
That and a stock F-body going 170-175 would make it faster than the (video now down) C5 going 172 below.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxpdSukuEY8
PLENTY of '01/'02 cars are over 310rwhp. For the reasons I listed above...
Significant? Not really.
A stock f-body will go 170. It takes some room, and obviously the limiter has to be shut off. They go 163 all day long.
Last edited by BAD ASS TA WS6; 02-24-2007 at 12:51 AM.
03-27-2011, 08:37 PM
#112
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i agree, the SS is shaped like a bullet, i mean exactly like a bullet.
they have a great design and shape for top end speeds.
also why these 300-400hp cars get mid 20s MPG all day
04-06-2011, 06:10 AM
#115
On The Tree
I hate to disagree, but the C6's have a substantial advantage as far as aerodynamics and general vehicle construction. Honestly, there is absolutely nothing on the bottom of the f-car to create an smooth surface for less turbulence[/SIZE]. None of the car has the rigidity to keep itself together at that speed in stock form. There's too many unstable variables in the F-body to do it safely.
My suggestion: Get a new goal, or get a new car.
My suggestion: Get a new goal, or get a new car.
04-22-2011, 05:35 PM
#116
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Stockbridge, MI
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure how i came upon this thread considering it is 4 years old, but i think it's funny how no one thought it was even remotely possible an fbody could hit 200mph, and now LMR went 239 in the standing mile. Things sure do change.
04-22-2011, 10:01 PM
#117
04-23-2011, 07:23 AM
#118
No, we already learned that in 07.
05-01-2011, 01:52 PM
#120
Teching In
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts