Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fuel Filter Connection Question - Wix 33100

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2014, 11:55 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cwd240z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Fuel Filter Connection Question - Wix 33100

In doing the LS1 swap in my S10 pickup, I got rid of the original 4.3 fuel filter in favor of the 2.2L flex fuel S10 filter (wix 33100) with the built in regulator, which is similar to the Corvette filter (wix 33737).

From what I have researched, 2.2L flex S10's were weird and had 5/16" feed lines and 3/8" return lines, which would lead me to believe that the center connection on the 33100 would be the feed and the offset would be the return (which is the opposite of the 33737 filter, from what I've seen) However, I have also read conflicting information that says the opposite. If only the damn filter was labeled.

I'm trying to prevent running the fuel backwards through the regulator and ruining it. Also, if I have starting issues, I'd like to know that the filter is connected correctly.

Is there anyone using this exact filter, Wix 33100, that can tell me definitely which connection is the feed from the tank and which is the return?

Thanks you guys.


Last edited by cwd240z; 03-21-2014 at 02:34 PM. Reason: updated photo
Old 03-21-2014, 12:33 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

With the fuel injection systems I have worked on the return line from the regulator was the smaller line.
Old 03-21-2014, 12:39 PM
  #3  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cwd240z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And that way makes sense which is why this is confusing.

Originally Posted by 1989GTA
With the fuel injection systems I have worked on the return line from the regulator was the smaller line.
Old 03-21-2014, 01:19 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
ls1nova71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Liberty, MO
Posts: 4,373
Likes: 0
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts

Default

Never seen a 5/16 feed with a 3/8 return, just doesn't sound right. Curious though, why not just use the 33737 Corvette filter that is known to work?
Old 03-21-2014, 02:11 PM
  #5  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cwd240z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 33100 filter is a little cheaper and guys have used it on LS S10 swaps with no problems. I've asked at least 2 guys who have used it and have gotten 2 different answers. Obviously, someone is wrong. If I still had my other S10 with it, I'd go outside, disconnect the 2 lines, turn it on and see which one spits fuel out.

Another reason I went with the 33100 filter is it has quick disconnect fittings on all 3 ports, eliminating the need for an additional fitting.


Originally Posted by ls1nova71
Never seen a 5/16 feed with a 3/8 return, just doesn't sound right. Curious though, why not just use the 33737 Corvette filter that is known to work?
Old 03-21-2014, 02:20 PM
  #6  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
bisqikss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: bama
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

the 5/16 on the side with the 3/8 is where the line from the fuel pump comes in, then out the other 5/16 to the engine. the 3/8 is a return. just went through this on a swap. I also used the 2.2 flex fuel module assembly in the tank. so I know that this combo works. I would ASSUME that with any other pump in the tank that this would work, but I know for sure it worked on my s10 swap.
Old 03-21-2014, 02:31 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cwd240z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bisqikss
the 5/16 on the side with the 3/8 is where the line from the fuel pump comes in, then out the other 5/16 to the engine. the 3/8 is a return. just went through this on a swap. I also used the 2.2 flex fuel module assembly in the tank. so I know that this combo works. I would ASSUME that with any other pump in the tank that this would work, but I know for sure it worked on my s10 swap.
Alright. I also got a Delphi flex fuel pump for it, but haven't put it in yet.

Just to clarify, the connection that goes to the engine is 3/8" on this filter, not 5/16".
Old 03-21-2014, 02:37 PM
  #8  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
bisqikss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: bama
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

no, use both 5/16's for the feed and the 3/8 is the return for the tank.
the side where you have two nipples(use the 5/16 to connect to the fuel pump in the tank, and the 3/8 for the return line to tank). the single 5/16 goes to the engine.
Old 03-21-2014, 02:42 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cwd240z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bisqikss
no, use both 5/16's for the feed and the 3/8 is the return for the tank.
the side where you have two nipples(use the 5/16 to connect to the fuel pump in the tank, and the 3/8 for the return line to tank). the single 5/16 goes to the engine.
Right, I'm following you on which is which on the side with two nipples. 5/16" is feed and 3/8" is return.

I was just clarifying that the fitting on the side of the filter with just one fitting, is 3/8". I've connected a 3/8" fitting to it. You can also tell by looking at the picture it is larger than the 5/16" connection on the other end. I updated the picture to show it labeled.

I appreciate your help man.
Old 03-21-2014, 02:42 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
bczee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I guess it might work as you have been told or read. Though I would question it capacity since it was used on a 2.2L as well as what fuel pressure is it rated at..

What is the return pressure rated at ?..Is the filter element rated to filter to the same Micron ? and at what pressure and flow rate ? This being that you are using something that was designed to work with 2.2L spec's and not going to a 5.3L that requires 58psi ?

Let us know what you find out.. if anything else new..if anything, I would swap it out more.
Old 03-21-2014, 02:49 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cwd240z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It has been documented on an S10 forum that the 2.2L flex filter works well with LS1 V8 swaps and has the correct pressure. One member has run an unmodified 2.2L flex fuel system with an LS engine swap up to 400hp. My stock LS1 should be fine with it.

Originally Posted by bczee
I guess it might work as you have been told or read. Though I would question it capacity since it was used on a 2.2L as well as what fuel pressure is it rated at..

What is the return pressure rated at ?..Is the filter element rated to filter to the same Micron ? and at what pressure and flow rate ? This being that you are using something that was designed to work with 2.2L spec's and not going to a 5.3L that requires 58psi ?

Let us know what you find out.. if anything else new..if anything, I would swap it out more.
Old 03-21-2014, 03:00 PM
  #12  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
bisqikss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: bama
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

sorry, I meant single 3/8 to engine. I know it sounds weird for it to be that way. I thought so at first, but Have been running this on s10 for about 5 months now, and have not had any issue with fuel at all.
Old 03-21-2014, 03:26 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

"Though I would question it capacity"

Me too. Especially when you up the horsepower. The Corvette filter can be had for under $40. I would not fool around at that price and go for the Vette filter.

Edit: The factory may have intentionally made the filter that way so it could not accidently be swapped onto another application such as the Corvette.
Old 03-22-2014, 12:29 PM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
ls1nova71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Liberty, MO
Posts: 4,373
Likes: 0
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts

Default

I'm sorry, but I still don't get it. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be a dick, but on Amazon, (just did a quick Google search) the fuel filters are about the same price. Actually, the Vette one is a couple of bucks cheaper? I would use a filter GM designed to work with a performance based V8 rather than a 4 cylinder.

Amazon.com: Wix 33737 Complete In-Line Fuel Filter, Pack of 1: Automotive Amazon.com: Wix 33737 Complete In-Line Fuel Filter, Pack of 1: Automotive

Amazon.com: Wix 33100 Complete In-Line Fuel Filter, Pack of 1: Automotive Amazon.com: Wix 33100 Complete In-Line Fuel Filter, Pack of 1: Automotive
Old 03-22-2014, 04:14 PM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
bczee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

+1 on ls1nova71... it is what I was thinking.. if GM spec'd out a filter or had the same spec's.. they would have used it, but I am sure they research everything and spec'd out the GF822/WIX33737..
Not that the WIX33100 would not work, but most likely at a reduction in capacity or Services Life.

Just my thinking and having to go with what the GM Engineer have come up with on Requirements and spec's... But everyone is free to use what they want and save a few dollars here and there.. but the only plus on this subject would be the fitting on the output side having a barbed tube for the port.

I wonder if anyone has cut open both of these and compared elements and bypass spring/valve.?

BC
Old 03-22-2014, 04:46 PM
  #16  
12 Second Club
 
lsxRanger94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 217
Posts: 565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Microgard 33737 19.95 at Oreilly auto.
Old 03-22-2014, 05:55 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
gofastwclass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: KCMO
Posts: 2,950
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1nova71
Curious though, why not just use the 33737 Corvette filter that is known to work?
Because some people enjoy attempting to reinvent the wheel.

Originally Posted by lsxRanger94
Microgard 33737 19.95 at Oreilly auto.
Exactly. Those can be a bit noisier than the WIX brand, but they are both in stock at your local O'Reilly.
Old 03-22-2014, 07:08 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (15)
 
sprayed99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DFW....TX
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1nova71
I'm sorry, but I still don't get it. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to be a dick, but on Amazon, (just did a quick Google search) the fuel filters are about the same price. Actually, the Vette one is a couple of bucks cheaper? I would use a filter GM designed to work with a performance based V8 rather than a 4 cylinder.

Amazon.com: Wix 33737 Complete In-Line Fuel Filter, Pack of 1: Automotive

Amazon.com: Wix 33100 Complete In-Line Fuel Filter, Pack of 1: Automotive
I have used both part numbers over 20K ish miles and then went to a much larger fuel system.

I had more consistent pressure with the vette filter compared to the 2.2L but both were in acceptable range to function properly. I however do not remember how they hooked up as it was several years I go I messed with those.

Just a thought. Hook it up with the feed from the tank and run hoses off of both ends into bottles. Have someone tap the key on and see which line provides fuel. This is what I did to confirm the proper way to install the filter/regulator.
Old 03-26-2014, 08:55 AM
  #19  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
cwd240z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sprayed99
Just a thought. Hook it up with the feed from the tank and run hoses off of both ends into bottles. Have someone tap the key on and see which line provides fuel. This is what I did to confirm the proper way to install the filter/regulator.
This method wouldn't work for me as my truck was originally a 4.3L with different style filter connections. I know which lines are which on the truck, but since the filter is from a different application it raised this question.


Also, for the sake of concluding a thread, I did get the truck running last weekend with the 5/16" being the supply from tank and 3/8" the return.
Old 03-26-2014, 12:58 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
bczee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 6,665
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Suggest you check the fuel pressure at the Rail/Injectors. .but good to hear your up and running !

If it works, it Works !

BC


Quick Reply: Fuel Filter Connection Question - Wix 33100



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 AM.