Mustang Ls1 headers
#41
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
also, why couldnt you take 351W shorties and the matching mustang h pipe? Id think if they fit around a T5, they'd fit the autos or the T56s ok. I hear the shorties dont have the clearance issues w/ the steering shaft. Anyone tried this?
Dave
Dave
#42
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dman
Ive got a set of shorty FMS 351W swap headers, a 1991 coupe and a friend getting ready to sell the engine out of his 99 vette...................!!!!! damn the temptation
Dave
#45
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol, I have some shorties off the 302 im going to try. Is the cylinder angle similar between the ls1 and the 302? If so, what is the deck height difference between the 2/ If they are similar, the 302 shorties I have may work. Ill keep you guys posted, but I'd like any other info anyone may have.
Dave
Dave
#46
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok i answered some of my own questions.
LS1 deckheight: 9.24"
302W deck: 8.206"
351W deck: 9.503
Seems the 302 shorties would be too "short" lol The 351W header will be about .25 too long but i dont see that being a huge problem. I dont see why one wuold have to modify any tubes though everything being equal. I'd think if nothing else, we'd have more room using a 351W header because it'll drop it down .25" or so to clear most things, including the steering shaft and firewall corners.
Dave
LS1 deckheight: 9.24"
302W deck: 8.206"
351W deck: 9.503
Seems the 302 shorties would be too "short" lol The 351W header will be about .25 too long but i dont see that being a huge problem. I dont see why one wuold have to modify any tubes though everything being equal. I'd think if nothing else, we'd have more room using a 351W header because it'll drop it down .25" or so to clear most things, including the steering shaft and firewall corners.
Dave
#47
8 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: the not so stock tribe
Posts: 3,697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sweet, now start working on getting a header in there and then tell me how to do it
i ordered a set of pace setter headers for an f-body ( if they need too much work to make them fit, i'll just sell them and get the 351 mac's) which should be here in a week or so ( i hope ), i'll be sure to take a bunch of pics when i get everything mocked up.
thanks for the info.
i ordered a set of pace setter headers for an f-body ( if they need too much work to make them fit, i'll just sell them and get the 351 mac's) which should be here in a week or so ( i hope ), i'll be sure to take a bunch of pics when i get everything mocked up.
thanks for the info.
#49
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 12,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When I test fit them, they needed about another inch of drop to fit the floor pan. If someone wanted to either space down the K-member and reset all the suspension angles, or drop the motor down in the K-member more, they would fit as-is. Not sure about the steering shaft though, I fit them w/o that in the car
#50
TECH Addict
iTrader: (36)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Murphy, Tx
Posts: 2,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brains
When I test fit them, they needed about another inch of drop to fit the floor pan. If someone wanted to either space down the K-member and reset all the suspension angles, or drop the motor down in the K-member more, they would fit as-is. Not sure about the steering shaft though, I fit them w/o that in the car
#51
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
351 mac headers are the only way to go with this swap i have already got them in my car and they fit good except for a few mods but they are easy. They hang a little low but with the th 350 trans i am running they are perfect to clear it.
#52
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 89lx-ls1
351 mac headers are the only way to go with this swap i have already got them in my car and they fit good except for a few mods but they are easy. They hang a little low but with the th 350 trans i am running they are perfect to clear it.
Dave
#55
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Farmington Hills Mi,
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has anybody call this company ? Maybe we could do a group perchase ?
http://racingjunk.com/exec/ca/view/5...DERS.html?gp=2
http://racingjunk.com/exec/ca/view/5...DERS.html?gp=2
#58
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Farmington Hills Mi,
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What k-member is everbody useing ??
i`m thinking of useing the aje for sbc and i read somewhere that they have a ls1 motor mount conversion kit ??? I have also read that a guy used a f-body ls1 k-member and bolted it in his mustang but i thing he had a 94?
Also whats the differance in the ls1 and zo6 block ?sorry new to the lsx motors.
p.s. i have mint 93 notchback heres a pic i want to do a all aluminum lsx motor for it.
http://img475.imageshack.us/img475/8...0car0287tg.jpg
i`m thinking of useing the aje for sbc and i read somewhere that they have a ls1 motor mount conversion kit ??? I have also read that a guy used a f-body ls1 k-member and bolted it in his mustang but i thing he had a 94?
Also whats the differance in the ls1 and zo6 block ?sorry new to the lsx motors.
p.s. i have mint 93 notchback heres a pic i want to do a all aluminum lsx motor for it.
http://img475.imageshack.us/img475/8...0car0287tg.jpg