Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lsx 302?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 02:36 PM
  #1  
Importmd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Appleton,WI
Default Lsx 302?

Ive been planning on swapping in a LQ9 in my 95 Z/28 this winter, but after reading about GM's concept 302 camaro it got me thinking. I cant find a hole lot about building one. my question is, is it as easy as taking a 5.3 and using a 4.8 crank? any input would be great.
http://www.zlx.com/camaro/302c.htm
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 03:17 PM
  #2  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,889
Likes: 9
From: Houston,TX
Default

just bore 4.8 .060= 5.0
throw on some 243 or 799, ls6 intake, gt11 cam. al supporting bolt ons, etc.
4.8 is a great engine, rpms very quick, sounds good, runs hard even in pu trucks
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #3  
Pop N Wood's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 8
Default

Why give up all that power by reducing displacement?

funny how they call it "high reving" then quote a HP peak at 6000 RPM. My 6.0 does better than that.

If they want to stay true to the spirt of the early Camaros, how about shaving a few thousand pounds off the cars instead?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 05:06 PM
  #4  
Importmd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Appleton,WI
Default

so what would you get if you through in a 4.8 crank in a 5.3? the only reason i ask is because i already have a free 5.3.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #5  
Datsun350Z's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Default

Why not keep the 5.3 as it is?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #6  
Importmd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Appleton,WI
Default

i thought it would be cool to build a high reving 302 like the old school z28. if not, i will stick with my 6.0 plan
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 05:27 PM
  #7  
Bo185's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 7
From: Beebe, Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by Importmd
so what would you get if you through in a 4.8 crank in a 5.3? the only reason i ask is because i already have a free 5.3.
You get another 4.8!!!! The only difference between the two is the crank! The bore is the same!!!


Why not swap the 4.8l crank in the 6.0l and have a fast rev'ing 5.3L!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 05:35 PM
  #8  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,889
Likes: 9
From: Houston,TX
Default

Originally Posted by Importmd
so what would you get if you through in a 4.8 crank in a 5.3? the only reason i ask is because i already have a free 5.3.
4.8/5.3 use same bore same block
diff cranks and rods.
5.3=3.622 stroke
4.8=3.268 stroke
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #9  
NemeSS's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (127)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,889
Likes: 9
From: Houston,TX
Default

Originally Posted by Bo185
You get another 4.8!!!! The only difference between the two is the crank! The bore is the same!!!


Why not swap the 4.8l crank in the 6.0l and have a fast rev'ing 5.3L!
will have to use 4.8 rods as well with balanced 4.8 crank to new 4.00+bore pistons.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 06:03 PM
  #10  
Importmd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Appleton,WI
Default

thanks guys, one more thing. the 4.8 has 6.278" rod length, i need 5.7" rods? to achieve the 302. are all gen motors rods the same? or are the 3rd gen only? thanks again
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 PM.