What does the VSS reading tell the PCM?
It seems logical that this sensor should be measuring driveshaft speed, which could be converted to road speed no matter what gear you are in. However some folks have told me that it should go between the transfer case and the transmission because the Low Range will confuse the PCM. I don't understand why the PCM would care if you are in low range or not. Road speed is what it is, regardless of the gear you are in.
The only reason I could see that making sense is that maybe the PCM would never shift an auto out of 1st gear until a certain speed, regardless of RPM? So I suppose with a manual transmission then, you would want the VSS after the transfer case, right?
Advance Adapters says the following in quite a few places:
"Vehicles with an engine conversion using a 1993 & later GM computer controlled engine and an automatic transmission requiring a VSS “should not” use the True-Pulse VSS kit. When using or installing this specific type of drive train combination, we highly recommend a VSS be located in the transfer case adapter* or the automatic transmission. This will give the ECU a correct 1 to 1 reading when in 4wd low range."
* Transfer case adapter being between the transfer case and the transmission.
http://advanceadapters.com/product/2...-cv-yoke).html
Can anyone help me through my confusion?
The VSS supplies a pulse the that computer needs to shift the trans at the right time. It doesn't care if you are in two wheel high or four wheel low.
I'm not sure but I bet the gear that the Vss reads needs to be the correct number teeth per 360 degree revolution of the trans output shaft.
If you put the vss it on the transfer case out put shaft the shifts will be off in four wheel low.
Just saying what worked for me.
Perhaps there is a switch in the T/C that tells the PCM that it's in 4low and it uses a different variables to calculate shift points?
I'm sorry if this sounds ****, I understand the workarounds (I like the dual VSS idea and may actually go with that) but my goal is to to make my installation look and work as factory as possible so I'm really trying to learn and understand the OEM way of doing it. One of the reasons I'm doing this project is for the hands-on education.
Trending Topics
That would be great if you could look up the shift tables for those trucks!
I'd imagine all factory 4x4s do that or have two VSS inputs. Otherwise how do they get the correct speedo reading in 4low?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
As long as the VSS reads the revolutions of the driveshaft/output shaft then it will read correctly no matter if its in high or low. If its in the adapter its reading the trans ratio not the low range so the VSS and the speedo will be off in low range. And if you have doubler will be worse.
Just like if you change tire size or gears the PCM doesn't know it unless you program it in because they are after the VSS, but it reads the low range gearing based off the VSS just as if it was another transmission gear.
THe signal lets the PCM know its in low you limit speed wise phsically by the low gears and I believe lows the shift points. But it knows the gear ratio based of the RPM of the VSS in the transfercase.
I think they AdvaceAdapters and others just try to up sell their adapters to make more money, I mean $250 buck just for a VSS WTF! If not then why does GM use a transfer case output mounted VSS???? If your using a stock GM case with a VSS, just use the VSS aready installed.
Last edited by Bo185; May 15, 2009 at 08:37 PM.
I wonder if the 4Low switch tells the shift routines in the PCM to just ignore the road speed from the VSS (or plugs some constant in there) and shift according to RPM only? Like sort of an "off road only" mode. That would account for the switch and the single table. I'm not sure how this theory could be tested though.
If that's true, I wonder if it would have some performance benefit, maybe to just leave it in that mode all the time or rig it to a switch on the dash. Just thinking out loud...
Last edited by YeepieJeepie; May 16, 2009 at 07:23 AM.
Also wasn't sure how the auto shifting would be in low range. It shifts great the way I'm using it now. Used the TC VSS to run the elec speedo since I wasn't using it for anything else. I could care less if my speedo is off while in low range. I'm pretty sure I can gauge what 5mph really is

I do recall seeing a '4wd low' discrete wire in the ECM wiring, but just assumed that it was only for dash status. Perhaps it's also used in the trans shift calcs. Not sure.
You're right though, the Atlas is very expensive and an OEM GM T/C would be a much more cost effective way to go.
Last edited by YeepieJeepie; May 17, 2009 at 09:28 AM.
Interestingly, here is what AA says about it in their Atlas transfer case guide. This would seem to support that it does more than just light the 4x4 indicator on the dash. The Atlas is available with various low range gear ratios, so I'm sure that's what the last sentence is about.
Regarding the T/C gear ratio, it's just a two speed with four shift positions (including neutral). There's a 1:1 gear in the 2high and 4high ranges (making it invisible gear ratio wise), then there's an under drive in 4low range. That's usually somewhere between 2:1 and 3:1. The Jeep Wrangler stock 4low ratio is 2.71:1 for example.
Multiply this by your axle gear ratio and whatever gear you shift the transmission to, it obviously lowers your final drive ratio considerably.
Last edited by YeepieJeepie; May 17, 2009 at 09:44 AM.
I may actually bite the bullet and go with an Atlas just to make things bolt in and hook up easier, plus it's short (length is always an issue in a Jeep) and I know it's bulletproof. I also like the ability to shift to 2Low on just the front or rear.
I'm keeping a drivers side front pumpkin and driveshaft. The Dana 30 is staying in the front and I'm going with a Ford 8.8 in the rear, this way my wheel bolt patterns match. The D30 will be beefed up with Superior 30 spline axles and ARB lockers front and rear. Somewhere in the future, the 8.8 may get a Superior Super 88 upgrade too.
This definitely isn't a low buck project!
Last edited by YeepieJeepie; May 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM.






