New "LT" engine series announced to replace the LS series

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

10-29-2012, 12:00 PM

#81

Justin@GMHTP

LS1Tech Sponsor

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Mar 2009

Posts: 334

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...1_small_block/

Reply Like

10-29-2012, 02:05 PM

#82

brewster240

TECH Regular

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: May 2006

Location: clearwater fl

Posts: 405

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

so nobody knows anything about the bellhousing?

Reply Like

10-29-2012, 03:32 PM

#83

Bo185

TECH Fanatic

Join Date: Jul 2005

Location: Beebe, Arkansas

Posts: 1,684

Likes: 1

Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by -TheBandit-

Noticing other differences here and there.

The 'vette accessory drive appears to place everything on one belt and on the passenger side.

You gotta put the turbo somewhere!

Quote:

Originally Posted by -TheBandit-

Driver's side appears to have a mechanical provision, perhaps for PS / hydro pump?

The boss on the drivers side is for a belt drive dry sump scavenge pump. There is a picture of on in the other Gen V thread in the news section.

I assume they are going with an electric PS pump much like the hybrid trucks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by -TheBandit-

No apparent reason for the humps in the valve covers (maybe for a different configuration of the Gen V?)???

The humps are baffle for the PCV system it stated it in the press release somewhere in it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by -TheBandit-

2 piece intake manifold? Hard to tell from the animation

It's two piece plastic welded together.

The bellhouse looks Gen V unique, looks like they had to off set the top bolt hole due to the DI pump drive.

Reply Like

10-29-2012, 03:55 PM

#84

brewster240

TECH Regular

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: May 2006

Location: clearwater fl

Posts: 405

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

yeah i already said that, looking for confirmation or actual info of some sort. side holes and dowels look similar.

Reply Like

10-29-2012, 07:31 PM

#85

02SOMWS6

10 Second Club

iTrader: (6)

Join Date: Nov 2003

Location: Wallkill ,NY

Posts: 2,638

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

I'm all for advancement in technology and all this sounds great. But the best thing I see out of this is it could bring down the price of LSX parts.

Reply Like

10-29-2012, 08:00 PM

#86

badazz81z28

TECH Addict

iTrader: (6)

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 2,389

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by brewster240

direct injection wont need injector or pump upgrades as soon, and smog laws arent why diesels are less desirable.

uneducated consumer, and price are. both of those contribute to low sales of diesels in things other than fullsize trucks.

Its the annoying sound for me...I can't stand diesel engines.

I honestly don't see a need to continue with the LS engines. I agree, they make good power, but they have their problems too. I think a new engine is a good way to go. Just think of all the upgrades you had to do, to not only make more power , but fix or improve not up to par parts. Sometimes its easier to just start over or change a foundation rather than find a bunch of fixes for an existing foundation. If you look at the new LT block, Looks LS to me.

-Rockers
-Oil consumption in PVC system
-Rod Bolts
-Oil Pumps
-#7 piston seems to be popular
etc..etc...

Last edited by badazz81z28; 10-29-2012 at 08:06 PM.

Reply Like

Reply Subscribe