Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

WHy do so many people choose the 5.3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2013, 06:09 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
BOXCHEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CattleAc
Did anybody mention they are cheap...???
And you know what else.

























they're really cheap too.

Old 05-22-2013, 06:31 AM
  #22  
Staging Lane
 
Ian Johnston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Mount Gambier, Australia
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Out here in Australia, the LS 5.7, and 6.0 are the most common engines. Used in our local GM cars since 1999. Still bringing big $ though. No 5.3 unless in the imported Chev pickups, so no wrecking stock.
It would be nearly cheaper for us to import the 5.3 from you blokes, than use our 5.7.
Cheapest way for us to do a conversion is to buy a whole wrecked car(as I did for my conversion)
Old 05-22-2013, 08:55 AM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
cruisin'73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Ian Johnston
Out here in Australia, the LS 5.7, and 6.0 are the most common engines. Used in our local GM cars since 1999. Still bringing big $ though. No 5.3 unless in the imported Chev pickups, so no wrecking stock.
It would be nearly cheaper for us to import the 5.3 from you blokes, than use our 5.7.
Cheapest way for us to do a conversion is to buy a whole wrecked car(as I did for my conversion)
Wow tough break for you guys down under! I scored my 5.3 for $250, sold the manifolds, intake and harness for $175. Total cost for 100K 5.3: $75! HHHMMM I wonder...
Old 05-22-2013, 10:19 AM
  #24  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
ls1nova71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Liberty, MO
Posts: 4,375
Likes: 0
Received 195 Likes on 141 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by cruisin'73
Wow tough break for you guys down under! I scored my 5.3 for $250, sold the manifolds, intake and harness for $175. Total cost for 100K 5.3: $75! HHHMMM I wonder...
I thought that 5.3's were cheap????
Old 05-22-2013, 12:05 PM
  #25  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
MustangLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jfisher
One big thing I see missing here is that everyone is assuming that all 5.3's are iron blocks. Most of the fastest 5.3 cars are running the aluminum blocked L33's.
I don't think anyone is assuming they are all iron blocks just the vast majority of them. The aluminum block 5.3's can go for as much as a 6.0 unless you get lucky. My iron 5.3 has been 9's and will be going 8's.
Old 05-22-2013, 12:14 PM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
ss performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

How much boost can the 5.3 (iron) take as opposed to a 6.0?

How much can you bore the iron 5.3?

Thanks
Old 05-22-2013, 04:44 PM
  #27  
TECH Fanatic
 
99VetteFRC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Felton Pa
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

There has been mention that the 4.8 and 5.3 share bore size. They are the same block. My 4.8 is cast behind the p/s bracket "4.8/5.3".
Old 05-23-2013, 05:19 PM
  #28  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
spacemanspif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Swedesboro, NJ
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Man I thought I got a deal when I bought my 5.3L 4 years ago for $600. Supposedly a 60K mile engine and I got complete engine and gas pedal. Seeing some of you pay $75 - 200 for your 5.3s makes me think that I paid too much now...
Old 05-23-2013, 08:00 PM
  #29  
Staging Lane
 
Wound-for-Sound's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Worthington, IN
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Italianjoe1
If I had the spare parts and time i'd pop a 4.8 crank into a 6.0 block, you'd end up with about a 5.3 but a way under-square engine that would be super rev happy and very good for boost/nitrous.
I like this idea. 4.8 crank and rods with a good 6.0 piston...
Old 05-23-2013, 08:51 PM
  #30  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
ss performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Wound-for-Sound
I like this idea. 4.8 crank and rods with a good 6.0 piston...
329 ci 5.4L

It would be a real RPM screamer!
Old 05-23-2013, 09:21 PM
  #31  
Staging Lane
 
Wound-for-Sound's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Worthington, IN
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ss performance
329 ci 5.4L

It would be a real RPM screamer!
without any number crunching that is assuming the pin height on a 6.0L piston is the right height for that combo without going custom rods to keep compression in check. Would like to stick the longest rod possibly in this combo to keep rod angle low and relieve the motor at those RPM's some. I'm gonna have to crunch a calculator tomorrow now thanks
Old 05-23-2013, 09:36 PM
  #32  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
ss performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Found this on another site;

So now you ask whats the diff between a 4.8L and 5.3L and why do they use the same block???

They use the same Bore but a 4.8L has a shorter stroke with a longer rod.
LR4 4.8L=3.267 (83mm) Stroke with 6.275 rod
LM4/LM7 5.3L=3.662 (92mm) stroke with 6.098 rod
LQ4/LQ9 6.0L=3.662 (92mm) stroke with 6.098 rod

Based on this to use the 4.8 crank you would need either custom rods or pistons.

I don't know if the pin could be moved up that much and not interfer with the rings. Might be worth looging into though.
Old 05-24-2013, 07:42 PM
  #33  
On The Tree
 
OnlyACamaroCanbeAZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tax free DE
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I usually buy the 6.0's but the biggest advantage the 5.3's have I think is really availability. Consider how many 1/2 trucks are made and sold in comparison to 3/4 or 1 ton trucks. plus those 3/4 or 1 ton trucks have diesel options. i guess the 1/2 tons also have the v6 option but i would assume GM has as many if not more duramax engines sold as they do v6's in the gmt 800/900 series trucks.

Plus there cheap cause of the availability and make good power. how can you go wrong?
Old 05-24-2013, 11:39 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
CattleAc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dakota Territory
Posts: 1,496
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OnlyACamaroCanbeAZ28
I usually buy the 6.0's but the biggest advantage the 5.3's have I think is really availability. Consider how many 1/2 trucks are made and sold in comparison to 3/4 or 1 ton trucks.

Don't forget all the ratted out Tahoe's, Suburban's and vans...


All great 5.3 fodder...
Old 05-25-2013, 04:04 AM
  #35  
On The Tree
 
proxemics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: saudi arabia
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

we have plenty of 5.7, 6.0 and 5.3 thanks to Australian sedans and American trucks and SUVs you can pick whatever engine for cheap, even complete wrecked cars are plenty and cheap



Quick Reply: WHy do so many people choose the 5.3?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 AM.