New Hooker 1st-gen/Nova swap parts info
#181
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
FWIW, I currently have the truck pan on my car and it "fits", but is kissing the sub-frame. I will be pulling the motor soon to swap out in favor of the 302-2 or 302-3 if it is out in enough time.
#182
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Holley released a 4th-gen style accessory drive system a few months ago that I believe will fit also based on my experience, but I can't say for certain since I've not had a chance to test fit it in a 1st-gen F-body yet. The reason I think it will fit is that the Holley set-up can be installed at the F-body or truck offset and the truck offset is the one I think that will be bolt-on compatible.
#184
#186
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
You might want to post your experiences in another section as this is meant specifically for the Holley motor mounts for f and x bodies. If you are changing the mounting location, it won't be as helpful to others.
#189
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
My plan for my accessories is a type of hybrid set-up that I believe will solve both problems of notching the frame and clearing the a-arms. I am running a truck pulley, and spacing out the low mount LS1 fbody alternator 3/4" so they are at the same pulley spacing. I haven't tested it yet as I am waiting for the longer bolts, but my mock up with the shorter bolts shows that it will have clearance everywhere without having to notch the frame.
A/C compressor is another story. I am running a Sanden 7176. Both the Holley low mount and Dirty Dingo low mount will not work. I fabbed my own.
I would have notched the frame (on both sides), but my subframe was powdercoated and assembled and I didn't want to go backwards.
Tim
#191
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks for clarifying. No, the Holley engine brackets won't allow fore/aft adjustment of the engine position, but they will install the engine in the subframe lower than any mounts that work with 1st-gen factory frame stands and engine mounts.
#193
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![](https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/ls1tech.com-vbulletin/2000x1504/2276_1hkr_on_68_camaro_3_859dbfbfe92b1954ee32d4fd7a4faddd34840e6a.jpg)
#194
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (27)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
John, for what it's worth I took a lot of time researching all of the options out there for putting an LS motor in a first gen, and decided on the Hooker Headers 12618HKR mounts because of the optimal driveline angles and setback. Simply said, the mounts just work.
Installation was a breeze, and it puts the motor in the perfect position (my opinion of course). My first LS swap in a 2nd gen Fbody I used the dirty dingo sliders as I thought it would give me a lot more options, but realistically it caused more effort in the long run to get all of the driveline components to work together happily.
Installation was a breeze, and it puts the motor in the perfect position (my opinion of course). My first LS swap in a 2nd gen Fbody I used the dirty dingo sliders as I thought it would give me a lot more options, but realistically it caused more effort in the long run to get all of the driveline components to work together happily.
#196
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I've read this thread several times over the years and a few within the last week so I apologize if this has already been answered:
What do you do when running an old Muncie, TH350, or Powerglide behind an LS with these Hooker engine mounts? I'm not asking how to make the transmission work with the engine, but about crossmember and driveshaft fitment.
Can I keep my stock crossmember and HD chrome moly driveshaft ? 1968 Camaro with manual steering and brakes. Switching from a 555" BBC/PG combo to a carbed/cammed L96 and Muncie 4 speed. I'm planning on using the Holley 302-2 oil pan and would like to use these Hooker engine mounts too. Will I have to use some other swap brackets if I want to keep the bellhousing flange in the stock location? Will the Hooker headers (longtube or mid-length) work with the back of the block in the sbc/bbc location?
I've read tons of build threads and there are so many different combinations. I really like this Hooker engine mount with it's clamshell design and good driveling angles.
What do you do when running an old Muncie, TH350, or Powerglide behind an LS with these Hooker engine mounts? I'm not asking how to make the transmission work with the engine, but about crossmember and driveshaft fitment.
Can I keep my stock crossmember and HD chrome moly driveshaft ? 1968 Camaro with manual steering and brakes. Switching from a 555" BBC/PG combo to a carbed/cammed L96 and Muncie 4 speed. I'm planning on using the Holley 302-2 oil pan and would like to use these Hooker engine mounts too. Will I have to use some other swap brackets if I want to keep the bellhousing flange in the stock location? Will the Hooker headers (longtube or mid-length) work with the back of the block in the sbc/bbc location?
I've read tons of build threads and there are so many different combinations. I really like this Hooker engine mount with it's clamshell design and good driveling angles.
#197
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As the Hooker engine mounts and transmission crossmember move the engine/trans mating plane forward slightly(about 5/8"),neither of them would be compatible with your Muncie being left in the stock location.
The 2nd and 3rd primary tubes of the Hooker long tube headers split around the steering box with an equal amount of clearance, so if you were to use them with a greater amount of engine set-back you may have interference between the 2nd tube and the front of the steering box. That would be the least of your issues as the headers are not compatible with your mechanical clutch linkage.
The Holley 302 oil pan will work for you even if you use another set of engine mounting brackets other than the Hooker parts.
The 2nd and 3rd primary tubes of the Hooker long tube headers split around the steering box with an equal amount of clearance, so if you were to use them with a greater amount of engine set-back you may have interference between the 2nd tube and the front of the steering box. That would be the least of your issues as the headers are not compatible with your mechanical clutch linkage.
The Holley 302 oil pan will work for you even if you use another set of engine mounting brackets other than the Hooker parts.
Last edited by user 4737373; 09-15-2017 at 06:11 PM.
#198
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Milledgeville, GA
Posts: 1,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I really appreciate the reply and hate to say that after even more searching I found where you had replied to a similar thread a couple of years ago and even worse it was me that had posted it. This new post still answered some questions I didn't have back then and gives me plenty to think about.
#199
TECH Senior Member
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
^^It's a bitch getting older, huh? lol