Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LS7 Powered "Humminbird" Helicopter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2014, 03:30 PM
  #1  
LS1Tech Editor
Thread Starter
 
Marcus S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default LS7 Powered "Humminbird" Helicopter


I know the LS fits in everything, but this is a surprise even for me.

It's called the Hummingbird 3000. It's full blown kit-helicopter that's equipped with and LS7 (!). While you might be able to go faster in a Corvette, the Hummingbird will happily take you up a solid 14,000 ft before it hits it's service ceiling.

Of course, the LS7 in this thing isn't stock. It has forged internals, a specialized camshaft, and revised cylinder heads. Interestingly, it's been derated to make 280 horsepower at up to 12,000 ft. The best part is that it'll run on regular, 87 octane unleaded. You could fly this thing to your nearest Chevron to top it off. Theoretically.

Top speed is 100 mph and it sucks down fuel at 10 GAL/hr. I imagine that's about what people are getting out of their blown Camaros anyway.

LS7 Powered "Humminbird" Helicopter-ls7hummingbirdhelicopter-4-.jpg

LS7 Powered "Humminbird" Helicopter-ls7hummingbirdhelicopter-2-.png

LS7 Powered "Humminbird" Helicopter-ls7hummingbirdhelicopter-1-.png

LS7 Powered "Humminbird" Helicopter-hummingbirdhelicopter.jpg
Old 02-14-2014, 03:34 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

****.
Old 02-14-2014, 03:49 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
Chicago TDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Dang...87 octane is a blessing for any type of aircraft!

With normal small engine flight like Cessna's and standard single engines, your at the mercy of aviation fuel and guzzling more then that....this is an AWESOME alternative...plus you can land that lil thing in your back yard!
Old 02-14-2014, 03:50 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
 
superdave84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Elkridge MD
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

But why use the LS7 if it has been reduced to 280hp? Why not an aluminum truck motor or something instead?
Old 02-14-2014, 03:59 PM
  #5  
Teching In
 
WS6inMIAMI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bad ***. ls everything!
Old 02-14-2014, 04:35 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
LLave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Im sort of surprised it doesn't have oiling issues mounted at that angle.
Old 02-14-2014, 05:01 PM
  #7  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
AKAFRED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

280hp is probably all it will make at 12k feet up maybe..



Originally Posted by superdave84
But why use the LS7 if it has been reduced to 280hp? Why not an aluminum truck motor or something instead?
Old 02-14-2014, 05:15 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
 
shank0668's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LLave
Im sort of surprised it doesn't have oiling issues mounted at that angle.
Dry Sump
Old 02-14-2014, 07:15 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
N20zuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Elizabeth City NC
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by superdave84
But why use the LS7 if it has been reduced to 280hp? Why not an aluminum truck motor or something instead?
Because the FAA has to test engines before they can be approved for aircraft use and production. Understand that engine is going to run at a certain RPM constantly through flight for many hours. They are claiming 3000hour overhaul on the LS7 which is murder on that thing.

With that being said, the availability of a off the shelf dry sump, steel main caps, replaceable cylinder liners and titanium connecting rods. Its a great out of the crate factory engine.
Old 02-14-2014, 08:12 PM
  #10  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (7)
 
anarchy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Memphis, TN---San Diego, CA
Posts: 802
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

too bad it retails for $152,000 and change for the kit. plus $55,000.00 for the powerplant, etc, etc... It's a bargain for a helo though.
Old 02-15-2014, 01:16 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (2)
 
pewterformula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Rockwall County, TX
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That's awesome. I want one.
Old 02-15-2014, 01:27 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
 
1989GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,092
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I saw a Cessna 172? conversion to an LS motor. It did have a gearbox to keep the propeller speed in check.
Old 02-15-2014, 01:29 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Pop N Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Like said above aircraft engines run at constant RPM so my guess they limited it to only 3-4K RPM to give it some life. That is why they want the large cubes. Last article I read about LS7's in aircraft also said they aren't approved for overhaul. So once it hits the maximum number of hours it is time to buy a new unit. I would imagine it also has dual computers. Not a cheap hobby.

That is an odd angle. Even with the dry sump you have to wonder if there isn't other oil system mods.
Old 02-15-2014, 06:36 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (9)
 
prochargedchevyi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That is awesome. However, they need to change their promo music because at the 3:30 mark, I thought I was watching a late 70's porno.
Old 02-15-2014, 08:30 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
sbcgenII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fort hood
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I thought the engine was stock at first. Thats a relief...
Old 02-15-2014, 10:26 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
.boB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 897
Received 33 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by superdave84
But why use the LS7 if it has been reduced to 280hp? Why not an aluminum truck motor or something instead?
Because of prop speed, an aircraft engine can only spin so fast, and no more. For something like this, it's probably about 3,000 rpm max redline, and cruises at 2,200 rpm.

It's not so much that the engine is detuned, it's that the HP rating is given at 2,500 rpm, and not max hp. So 280hp is actually pretty good.

By comparison, a 580 cubic inch Lycoming flat 6 aircraft engine makes 315hp, and costs well over $120,000!
Old 02-16-2014, 12:09 AM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (10)
 
Z28Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by anarchy99
too bad it retails for $152,000 and change for the kit. plus $55,000.00 for the powerplant, etc, etc... It's a bargain for a helo though.
55K powerplant?? is that LS7 made out of gold??
Old 02-16-2014, 02:31 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
 
Mike_hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default badass helicopter

Pretty neat helicopter, pretty reasonably priced too. An r22 only seats two, has a higher fuel burn rate and a lower overhaul period and costs about the same as this humminbird. Most aircraft use 100ll fuel that's about $6 a gallon. This chopper can probably be compared to the r44 helicopter in size/useful load, the 44 has a 540 cubic inch flat six engine that puts out 260hp but makes about 500 lbft of torque Its fuel burn rate is about 18 gallons an hour(100ll) and it costs around $400,000. Usually an aircraft engine is derated to increase longevity, move the powerband lower to ~3000 rpm and sometimes the rest of the aircraft's frame/driveshafts/gearboxes/rotors and hubs cant take the stress that higher horsepower may put on it. The redneck in me wants to see what it sounds like doing a low fly-by with flowmasters on it
Old 02-16-2014, 04:08 AM
  #19  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
TipsyMcStagger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: FL Gulf Coast
Posts: 904
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by N20zuki
Because the FAA has to test engines before they can be approved for aircraft use...
Not for experimentals.

Tipsy
Old 02-22-2014, 09:00 AM
  #20  
12 Second Club
 
breze84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Now I can tell people I have a Helicopter Motor in my car lol...


Quick Reply: LS7 Powered "Humminbird" Helicopter



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:32 AM.