Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anyone weight there ls1 3rd gen (GTA particularly)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2005, 10:17 AM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
HartAttack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Anyone weight there ls1 3rd gen (GTA particularly)

Just like the title says, but if you have any third gen car with an ls1 , what did it weight?
Thanks
-Chris
Old 09-29-2005, 11:54 AM
  #2  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (17)
 
SprayJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would be very interested to know also!
Old 09-29-2005, 12:46 PM
  #3  
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Speartech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Not a GTA but my 91 Z28 weighed about 3130 back when the LS1 was normally aspirated. That's was with no driver, no A/C, no back seat, and a non T-top car. It's up about 100 pounds now with the supercharger. But that's a NICE 100 pounds!
__________________

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno

www.speartech.com
Old 09-29-2005, 01:23 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
 
92CamaroReallySlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Itasca, IL
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I weighed my car at 3360 with me 3230 without me. This is with all the AC still in and all the seats in. Power mirrors and windows. No jack and spare tire. Its a 92 RS.
Old 09-29-2005, 01:33 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
LS1rscamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

whats the overal weight drop from before the swap to after?
Old 09-29-2005, 01:36 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
92CamaroReallySlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Itasca, IL
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In general the motor is about +-100 lbs less. I also have tubular k-member and a-arms which might be 30 lbs or so. If you went from a 700R4 to a T-56 you would probably save some more because I think the T56 is lighter.
Old 09-29-2005, 05:39 PM
  #7  
Launching!
 
bifster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: cobourg ON
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know from wheing parts that the engine heads and block are 2/3ds lighter then the old cast iron blocks and heads so there a rouph guess
Old 09-29-2005, 05:50 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
91sbcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so does it or does it not raise the front end up 1-2"s
Old 09-29-2005, 05:58 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
 
92CamaroReallySlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Itasca, IL
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well I have 1" lowering springs, with an ls1 and all tubular parts and it looks lower than it was before I did all the work. Theoretically I would think it should but it didnt in my case.
Old 09-29-2005, 06:15 PM
  #10  
Launching!
 
jdperk-86elco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I measured the ride height from different front end locations like from the bottom of the front frame to the floor before I remove the stock engine and transmission. After I get the car on the ground with the LS1 and transmission in it I will remeasure to see if it impacts the ride height.

When I re-measure I will post on my on going El Camino thread. I am not there yet. I am expecting slight ride height increase but I suspect it will be less than 1 inch. My installation placed the motor in almost the exact location as others have used motor mounts that move the motor up and more forward than a stock location. I would suspect my installation would show the most difference where the other installations with the motor more forward would show the least.
Old 09-29-2005, 06:52 PM
  #11  
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Speartech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 91sbcamaro
so does it or does it not raise the front end up 1-2"s
Yes! It definitely does. We've done 2 3rd gen swaps here (my car and a Firebird). Both sat 1-2" higher in the front afterwards.
__________________

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno

www.speartech.com
Old 09-29-2005, 07:27 PM
  #12  
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Speartech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I don't have any real good views showing the ride height difference. This one gives you a little idea of the change (maybe):

__________________

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno

www.speartech.com
Old 09-29-2005, 11:21 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
Brads454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here's the height difference on our car w/ sportlines. It was too low in the back w/ the springs in after so I went back to stock rear's.
Before the springs-


With all 4 Sportlines in-



Stock rears and Sportlines in the front (the angle sucks cause the hill, but yea)
Old 09-30-2005, 07:17 AM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
HartAttack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Speartech
Not a GTA but my 91 Z28 weighed about 3130 back when the LS1 was normally aspirated. That's was with no driver, no A/C, no back seat, and a non T-top car. It's up about 100 pounds now with the supercharger. But that's a NICE 100 pounds!
Nice, thats right in with the vette's in weight!
My '87 is a hard top car also. Very nice info to know. Do you have a tubular K-member also? Roll cage?
yes that 100lb Radix is damn nice! Car looks good!! I will be in touch with you sir in the future about wire harnesses.
Thanks!
Old 09-30-2005, 12:18 PM
  #15  
9 Second Club/LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (14)
 
Speartech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Anderson, Indiana
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

No tubular K-member or roll cage.

It always seems to sit higher in the front when I push the pedal on right.



Sorry....I couldn't resist!
__________________

91 Z28 LS2 408CI, LS9 Supercharger, LPE GT7 cam, Yank3000, 3450 raceweight.
Latest numbers: 9.71 ET, 141.42 MPH, 1.40 60' , 610 RWHP Mustang Dyno

www.speartech.com
Old 09-30-2005, 02:16 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
91sbcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

With the 1" lowering springs and after the swap do you run into any major difficulties. other then speed bumps ect..?
Old 09-30-2005, 02:59 PM
  #17  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
MrDude_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

full weight, my car was 3615lbs with me in it.
it now weighs 3220 with me in it... i weigh 10lbs more then i did when it was weighed stock.
i still have skinnies, lightweight battery, lightweight carpet, and a few other mods to do to lose weight.
Old 09-30-2005, 05:27 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
 
92CamaroReallySlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Itasca, IL
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 91sbcamaro
With the 1" lowering springs and after the swap do you run into any major difficulties. other then speed bumps ect..?
Well other than the springs not fitting real well in the spring pockets, and the oil pan, rack and pinion, and y-pipe being really close to the ground...nope, lol. I havent come across any speed bumps, and I hope I never do. I dont think I could make it over any speed bump.
Old 05-23-2009, 02:02 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (14)
 
firechicken76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: washington state
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

sorry to wake up an old thread, but my gta clone weighed in at 3140 a couple weeks ago (its really an 84 converted to an 88)
Old 05-23-2009, 06:17 PM
  #20  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
V8Rumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocky Mtn thin air & snow...
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Just in case anyone searches for weights on GTAs, mine was originally 3750 with me in it (225 lbs). (Yeah, it was a bit of a tank...) I did some weight reduction before starting on my L92 swap, & was able to take 110 lbs. out of the car. Once my swap is complete, I'll update this thread as soon as I'm able to weigh the car again.


Quick Reply: Anyone weight there ls1 3rd gen (GTA particularly)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 PM.