LS1 swapped into an EVO!
i might snap a pic with a level on the fule rails to show you how regular the angle is.
as for cranking the boost, well lets put it this way : this is easier and more dependable.
we have a couple of "highly modified" evos here which make 540 crank hp on C16 and if you see the amount of money and work that had to be done to make them reach that level you would just think "why?? " you end up spending two times more than the price of the car to make that level of power.
in this case, the car can make 600 rwhp very dependably and still be a great daily driver all on pump gas ( the thing still has AC) all while costing less than the price of his old engine and transaxle.
The other EVOs and STIs wont know what hit them....or what blew by them. I say good show...good work...and good god get us more pics and some video of the thing running!!!
Justin
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
i'll get pics with a level on the fule rail to show you .
(note: i drove the thing and its a blast! can you say instant drift!)
thanks sam for the write up ,about engine angle it's almost like transam engine angle
here is the pix
#1 is a level on TM fuel rail
#2 is a level on evo rail
Last edited by azooooz; Jun 13, 2007 at 12:07 PM.

Why the victor jr. intake? Seems as though cutting the hood could have been avoided by using a Weiand intake w/ possibly only a slight difference in volumetric efficiency due to the flow differences.




