heads cam package or prochagred
#2
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by indy500
which way you will go ... heads and cam package or prochagred ?and why ?
#5
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by mdhmi
ProCharger all the way!. Give ECS or A&A a call and ask about their SIC ATI kits.. Mine is being installed as we speak.
Cheers,
Mark
Cheers,
Mark
#6
TECH Enthusiast
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
IMO I would build a motor for a boosted application or at the very least put on some truck heads to lower the compression on the stock shortblock. Maybe I'm just to conservative about that. Heads and cam are a good route to take if you don't want to build for boost. My current setup is with a fairly mild cam and it made the numbers in my sig.
Trending Topics
#8
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by c5blkvette
No chance... Go with H/C! A guy had a procharger on the dyno at ESP after mine and he was getting max 385RWHP/365tq... I am getting 400rwhp/385tq with home ported LS6 heads, 222/224 cam and other mods.
![Happy](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_stretch.gif)
I ran a H/C setup and liked it.On the Vette I'm doing a Procharger and fully expect to hit 480-500rwhp on the stock longblock while keeping the stock drivability.The problem with forced induction is that you start to get greedy.Within time you find yourself in need of a new shortblock.I'm already planning out a new forged motor
![Embarassed](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_emb.gif)
#9
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
And you know w/ LS1s unless you tweek that CR a bit, they arent going to like anything high on the boost (of course if you build a motor, than that theroy's shot to hell).
My vote's for the procharger. Only cause blower whine is coo
My vote's for the procharger. Only cause blower whine is coo
#10
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
my goal is 800hp, so i go'n to do it step by step ,
full bolt one - procharge 7 psi (( do it first cause my c5 just run 20,000 mile )) -than go for heads and cam with forged bottom end . 12 psi
i think it kick assssssssss street car with this mod.
full bolt one - procharge 7 psi (( do it first cause my c5 just run 20,000 mile )) -than go for heads and cam with forged bottom end . 12 psi
i think it kick assssssssss street car with this mod.
#11
12 Second Club
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Here is my brief thoughts.
H/C can add some great power and will be very reliable. You need to make sure that all components work together or the best results may not be reached. the plus is you can get some of that cam lope at idle that I personally Love.
S/C will add great power also and can be relaible but you are adding additional components under the hood that may break and leave you on the side of the road. One plus for the S/C is that pulleys can easily be swapped for some extra power or a small shot of juice can be added to both applications if desired.
So my theory has been stay N/A because there is less components to break. I am actually looking at an S/C set up now, so I may go against my own theory of brakeage
.
Any route you take with the LS1 as long you do the work properly will yield great results be it N/A, S/C or just adding Juice. Good luck
H/C can add some great power and will be very reliable. You need to make sure that all components work together or the best results may not be reached. the plus is you can get some of that cam lope at idle that I personally Love.
S/C will add great power also and can be relaible but you are adding additional components under the hood that may break and leave you on the side of the road. One plus for the S/C is that pulleys can easily be swapped for some extra power or a small shot of juice can be added to both applications if desired.
So my theory has been stay N/A because there is less components to break. I am actually looking at an S/C set up now, so I may go against my own theory of brakeage
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
Any route you take with the LS1 as long you do the work properly will yield great results be it N/A, S/C or just adding Juice. Good luck
#12
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ROJO99
Here is my brief thoughts.
H/C can add some great power and will be very reliable. You need to make sure that all components work together or the best results may not be reached. the plus is you can get some of that cam lope at idle that I personally Love.
S/C will add great power also and can be relaible but you are adding additional components under the hood that may break and leave you on the side of the road. One plus for the S/C is that pulleys can easily be swapped for some extra power or a small shot of juice can be added to both applications if desired.
So my theory has been stay N/A because there is less components to break. I am actually looking at an S/C set up now, so I may go against my own theory of brakeage
.
Any route you take with the LS1 as long you do the work properly will yield great results be it N/A, S/C or just adding Juice. Good luck
H/C can add some great power and will be very reliable. You need to make sure that all components work together or the best results may not be reached. the plus is you can get some of that cam lope at idle that I personally Love.
S/C will add great power also and can be relaible but you are adding additional components under the hood that may break and leave you on the side of the road. One plus for the S/C is that pulleys can easily be swapped for some extra power or a small shot of juice can be added to both applications if desired.
So my theory has been stay N/A because there is less components to break. I am actually looking at an S/C set up now, so I may go against my own theory of brakeage
![Rolleyes](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/rolleyes.gif)
Any route you take with the LS1 as long you do the work properly will yield great results be it N/A, S/C or just adding Juice. Good luck
FI
![Guns](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_guns.gif)
boosssssssssssssssssst it and enjoy the power
#13
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by indy500
which way you will go ... heads and cam package or prochagred ?and why ?
Last edited by C5 CU; 07-12-2004 at 07:37 AM.
#14
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by C5 CU
i asked a H/C vs SC question on another forum, just a few responses. But i was following SC section and noticed not to amy of them listed their 1/8th or 1/4 track times, commonly SC cars had more HP but lots more TQ...so I asked if H/C cars were faster and surprisingly most of the answers were yes!