Corvette Performance
C5 | Z06 | C6 | ZR1 | C7

why do C5's put down less power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2005, 07:26 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Slow Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Pembroke Pines,Fl
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Unhappy why do C5's put down less power?

i don't get why C5's put down less power, on the dyno, than LS1 F-bodies stock for stock or with minor bolt-ons? i mean is it in the tune, that they get from the factory and if thats true, than why would GM do this to C5's?
Old 09-04-2005, 08:02 PM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
 
1moreblackta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: richardson, tx
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the IRS absorbs more power than the solid axle in f-body's
Old 09-04-2005, 08:05 PM
  #3  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 32,987
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 19 Posts

Default

yep, the drivetrain is less efficient. That independent rear has two driveshafts to turn vs two simple solid axles on a f-body rearend.
Old 09-04-2005, 08:23 PM
  #4  
Shorty Director
iTrader: (1)
 
VINCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Valrico, Florida
Posts: 8,260
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

The two before me are correct. I noticed that when I put my 408ci in my current C5.
Old 09-04-2005, 09:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
BadMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Its all weird, I know that when I modded my old C5 stock was like 310rwhp. With heads and cam it was like 380rwhp. A similar setup in other cars was getting well up there around 400rwhp. Then I get my current C5 did not dyno before the procharger, but a friend of mine with a TA has 460rwhp with a cam and heads and a better tune. Mine with a crappy tune is 488rwhp and everything else is completely stock minus the clutch (with more left in it). I still have yet to figure that out. But over all our IRS sucks up alot of power. oh well. The numbers do not do much for me its how it performs on the track. And I am definitly not disapointed.
Old 09-04-2005, 11:07 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Slow Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Pembroke Pines,Fl
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

thanks for all the info guys, i really appreciate it. damn that independent rear sucks , o well at least thats one of the reasons why vette's handle better than F-bodies. so basically its just that and not that they detune vette's?
Old 09-05-2005, 02:49 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Robert56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 9,557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Thing about it, you'll make it back up in weight savings.
Robert
Old 09-05-2005, 07:46 AM
  #8  
Formerly MagRedC5
 
Soldiernurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BadMonkey
Its all weird, I know that when I modded my old C5 stock was like 310rwhp. With heads and cam it was like 380rwhp. A similar setup in other cars was getting well up there around 400rwhp. Then I get my current C5 did not dyno before the procharger, but a friend of mine with a TA has 460rwhp with a cam and heads and a better tune. Mine with a crappy tune is 488rwhp and everything else is completely stock minus the clutch (with more left in it). I still have yet to figure that out. But over all our IRS sucks up alot of power. oh well. The numbers do not do much for me its how it performs on the track. And I am definitly not disapointed.
The C5 weighs about 300lbs. less than an 4th Gen FBody. Of course, handles way better than a TA on the twisties, too. I was real disappointed with my C5, until the TMS was deleted. Plus, seems like with the correct mods, along with correct tuning the C5 is real perf mod receptive.

I traded in my 2002 NHRA SE Trans Am for my current '01 C5 Coupe. Although, the TA was a nice ride I have no regrets & love my MagRedC5.






































BTW, nice color C5 of your's.
Old 09-05-2005, 10:00 AM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
SideStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Old 09-05-2005, 03:05 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (2)
 
PunkNPonys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robert56
Thing about it, you'll make it back up in weight savings.
Robert

You took the words straight out of my mouth. The vettes will still be faster and will handle better.
Old 09-05-2005, 05:10 PM
  #11  
On The Tree
 
Gman2002Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: St. Clair
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think it is all subjective...When I dyno'd my '00 FRC stock, it put down 307 rwhp (Mustang Dyno)...Stock F-bodies were only doing 280~290 rwhp stock on the same dyno...

Peace...Gman
Old 09-05-2005, 11:29 PM
  #12  
On The Tree
 
tigertank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Angleton Texas
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TMS delete what is this?
Old 09-06-2005, 12:25 AM
  #13  
Restricted User
iTrader: (9)
 
NOSjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

TMS = Torque management.
Old 09-06-2005, 05:54 AM
  #14  
Formerly MagRedC5
 
Soldiernurse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tigertank
TMS delete what is this?
The Torque Management System [TMS] retards timing when certain mathematical conditions are met, i.e. WOT shifts. So, it retards timing when it forsees engine torque raising above the "safety" parameter set in the PCM, which occurs when the engine is at high RPMs and the PCM has just commanded a shift.

There are three performance reducing systems on the C5;

1. Active Handling [AHS]
2. Traction control [TCS]
3. Torque management. [TMS]

Each unique, having it's own specific job to perform. IMHO, the AHS is an outstanding C5 feature, which I rarely disengage. I will hold "the button" for 5 seconds to engage the Competition mode, which disengages the TCS, yet AHS remains engaged. My TMS has been deleted via LS1 Edit.

Old 09-06-2005, 09:06 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
Assassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nevada
Posts: 2,437
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the TMS is only on autos though right?....
Old 09-06-2005, 09:22 AM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Assassin
the TMS is only on autos though right?....

ALL cars have it. Grab yourself an editing program,...or grab a diablosport tuner,..you can turn it off,...and on. Well worth it.
Old 09-06-2005, 09:55 AM
  #17  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Gordy M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There are two types of torque management systems, one for the engine and one for the transmission. For the trans it is set at 350 lbs of torque, on an auto, it is very noticable when you shift or under high acceleration. If you change it, many feel it is good to keep a degree of TM for longevity of the trans. Moving it up to 450 on a stock engine is a common solution. With more HP/TQ mods other changes should occur including beefing up the trans with shift kits, billit accumulators, etc. and moving the TM to a higher TQ setting. TM on the 6 speed is less noticable and most do not bother with it. The engine TM is another safety item in the PCM and often is not raised unless you go with boosted/NI systems.
Old 09-06-2005, 11:02 AM
  #18  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Slow Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Pembroke Pines,Fl
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so my vette most likely has TMS?
Old 09-06-2005, 11:16 AM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
V-seriesTech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: East Coast
Posts: 6,353
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Slow Vette
so my vette most likely has TMS?

for sure.
Old 09-06-2005, 02:04 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Slow Vette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Pembroke Pines,Fl
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by V-seriesTech
for sure.
is ur vette a A4 or M6?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:19 PM.