Stock C6 Dyno
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
A friend of mine dynoed his stock 07 6spd C6 and put down 330hp on a dynojet. That same day we installed a Corsa Sport Catback and Corsa X-pipe and dynoed it again. This time it put down 340. We were planning on putting on a Vararam but UPS never showed.
These results seem kind of low compared to other C6s. What do yall think?
These results seem kind of low compared to other C6s. What do yall think?
#3
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CK9887
A friend of mine dynoed his stock 07 6spd C6 and put down 330hp on a dynojet. That same day we installed a Corsa Sport Catback and Corsa X-pipe and dynoed it again. This time it put down 340. We were planning on putting on a Vararam but UPS never showed.
These results seem kind of low compared to other C6s. What do yall think?
These results seem kind of low compared to other C6s. What do yall think?
#4
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The better flowing exhaust system could of messed up the air/fuel ratio, which can give you a lower than expected rwhp gain. It would of been interesting to check the before and after air/fuel ratio at wide open throttle.
We dyno'ed this C6 before and after installing an ATI ProCharger. Bob
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=30
We dyno'ed this C6 before and after installing an ATI ProCharger. Bob
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com...Car.php?car=30
#5
Restricted User
iTrader: (43)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bourbonnais, Illinois
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We just did a 2006 C6 A6 all stock that made 323 RWHP. We just did another 2005 A4 car that did 346. I dont think that its the trans eating up that much more over the A4, I think its just the variables between vehicles. They were both done the same week BTW.
#6
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Is a dynojet the same as a mustang dyno? Also, during the dyno the shop didnt put a fan in front of the car, doesnt this make a difference?
Also, what kind of numbers should the car put down after the Vararam install?
Also, what kind of numbers should the car put down after the Vararam install?
#7
![Smile](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon7.gif)
Originally Posted by CK9887
Is a dynojet the same as a mustang dyno? Also, during the dyno the shop didn't put a fan in front of the car, doesn't this make a difference?
Also, what kind of numbers should the car put down after the Vararam install?
Also, what kind of numbers should the car put down after the Vararam install?
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com/dyno.php
http://www.exoticperformanceplus.com/dynospecs.php
We always use fans when we dyno a car, and it still does not exactly simulate the amount of airflow a car sees cutting through the wind at speed.
I'd say you will see 10 rwhp with the Vararam. Bob
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Burbs of Detroit
Posts: 6,524
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CK9887
Is a dynojet the same as a mustang dyno? Also, during the dyno the shop didnt put a fan in front of the car, doesnt this make a difference?
Also, what kind of numbers should the car put down after the Vararam install?
Also, what kind of numbers should the car put down after the Vararam install?
The fan not being on for your pull just let your engine heat up a little more then if it was on. Was the hood up or down?? More heat means less power on your graph. Don't get caught up in your numbers. I went to LG looking for 480+ rwhp and only managed 460 rwhp. I was a bit disappointed until I drove the car. Then I forgot that I didn't make 480 + like I had wanted to. Good luck and let us know how it went, I'd love to see a before and after graph with a VaraRam in place. (sorry for the long post)
#9
![Smile](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon7.gif)
Originally Posted by NBM2001Z28
We just did a 2006 C6 A6 all stock that made 323 RWHP. We just did another 2005 A4 car that did 346. I dont think that its the trans eating up that much more over the A4
![Nod](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_nod.gif)
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have a question, that has yet to be intelligently answered. Is the torque figure given on a chassis dyno pull, torque produced at the wheels, or at the flywheel? And if the torque figure is at the flywheel, what makes you think the h.p. isn't also? (okay two questions) And contrary to what a few are bound to say, I am not trying to be an ***, I really would like to know. Because most of these dyno figures just don't add up.
#13
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Holly Ridge, NC
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ummm on a dyno it shows the power (both torque and horsepower) that it is making at the wheels... thats the whole point of a dyno.... if you want flywheel numbers look up kbb....
...You didn't look like you were being an *** just there, just clueless...
...You didn't look like you were being an *** just there, just clueless...