M12trans VS. MN6trans w/4.10 rear at the track questions
#21
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: York, PA
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/ranks/ls1tech20year.png)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Sad](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/smilies/LS1Tech/gr_sad.gif)
#22
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
![Default](https://ls1tech.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I see a number of S/C c6's running 3.90s over at CF. The 2006 C6 internals are a little better, but it isn't enough of a difference to say that is why a C6 FI can run more gear than a C5.
The car would 60ft better.
I would end up in 4th gear sooner-slightly hurting 8th mile mph and maybe ET
I will then drop to a lower mph/rpm in 4th due to the sooner shift and have to pull through 4th longer. This will increase MPH but I do feel its going to be a slight negative effect on ET versus the MN6 trans gear ratios.
I would end up in 4th gear sooner-slightly hurting 8th mile mph and maybe ET
I will then drop to a lower mph/rpm in 4th due to the sooner shift and have to pull through 4th longer. This will increase MPH but I do feel its going to be a slight negative effect on ET versus the MN6 trans gear ratios.