Auto 5.0 tune/intake 12.3x @114 Atco
11-14-2010, 11:22 AM
#1
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
Auto 5.0 tune/intake 12.3x @114 Atco at my friend's shop in Toms River working on some countertops, he just got the call from a customer running at atco this morning. 2011 Mustang GT auto, Best run so far is 12.30 @114 with a 1.9 60'. stock tires, everything except tune/intake.. Guys getting a procharger installed soon that friggin thing is gonna fly... I still don't get all these "killed a new 5.0" threads when these cars seem to be hustling at the track lol
11-14-2010, 12:44 PM
#3
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
There quick... I seen 1 running 12.60 @ 109 don't know if it had any mods and another they guy said he ran a best of 13.2 stock..... I'm wondering how those .060 cylinder liners are gonna hold up to boost. Does'nt seem like much material there for that.
11-14-2010, 01:14 PM
#4
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
"weeez gonna findz out" hahahaha i will keep all informed of the outcome, as long as i'm "in the loop" lol..
11-14-2010, 01:54 PM
#5
those 5.0s are sick,but some still think 5th gens are faster.lol
all the 5th gens blow @ the track i go to in et&mph wise
i have seen three 5.0s @ the track and all them run strong
11.45@118(4000stall,4.30,xpipe,catback,tune)
12.3@116(slicks,catback,cai,tune)
12.8@112(stock)
all the 5th gens blow @ the track i go to in et&mph wise
i have seen three 5.0s @ the track and all them run strong
11.45@118(4000stall,4.30,xpipe,catback,tune)
12.3@116(slicks,catback,cai,tune)
12.8@112(stock)
11-14-2010, 02:15 PM
#6
These cars run great with a tune, but in true stock form they are a mid 13 car.
back to back runs 13.5 with an auto 2011 5.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wo-2szvBTE
back to back runs 13.5 with an auto 2011 5.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wo-2szvBTE
11-14-2010, 06:36 PM
#7
those 5.0s are sick,but some still think 5th gens are faster.lol
all the 5th gens blow @ the track i go to in et&mph wise
i have seen three 5.0s @ the track and all them run strong
11.45@118(4000stall,4.30,xpipe,catback,tune)
12.3@116(slicks,catback,cai,tune)
12.8@112(stock)
all the 5th gens blow @ the track i go to in et&mph wise
i have seen three 5.0s @ the track and all them run strong
11.45@118(4000stall,4.30,xpipe,catback,tune)
12.3@116(slicks,catback,cai,tune)
12.8@112(stock)
mustang that runs and that doesn't need a blower to beat a stock LS1 f-body. So Ford blows Jit-head. The new 5.BLOW ****-stang is a low 13 second car stock like the new camaro. And it weighs a lot less. So the mustang ain't that great. You didn't see ****. You're just making up times to justify the mustang. See it's always ******** like you that talk stupid **** like the 5th gen blows is why chevy guys hate mustang guys. It's not the car thats bad its the mustang owners that are jerkoffs. STILL a head/cam 4th gen will walk the new 5.blow and so will a modded 5th gen camaro. So quote facts not your little *** comments.
Trending Topics
11-14-2010, 06:41 PM
#8
These cars run great with a tune, but in true stock form they are a mid 13 car.
back to back runs 13.5 with an auto 2011 5.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wo-2szvBTE
back to back runs 13.5 with an auto 2011 5.0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wo-2szvBTE
Yep you got it...but there's asses like the guy saying 5th gens blow. His ***
probably was never in one. I drove a manual and a auto and they are built like tanks. I'll bet money after 3 years the mustang rattles like hell, like all
mustangs do. Whats Ford gonna do when they have to add more impact
protection next year? Its a new federal standard. Chevy did it already when they made the new camaro. The 5.0 will be a 14 second car again..lol.
Plus any car adding a procharger or tuning or whatever is gonna run hard.
My buddy ran 12.01@112 mph with only a Vig3200, a Comp 216/220 cam and tuning.Stock manifolds, y-pipe and CB.
its all relative.
Last edited by BlackNiteWS6; 11-14-2010 at 06:54 PM.
11-14-2010, 07:23 PM
#10
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
it took GM to drop a 5.7 liter in their car to beat the 302ci. mustangs and even THAT was a close race. I ran a 92 powertrain ported stock heads & B303 (stock exhaust) with 3.55's in an 86 5 speed GT and beat friend's LT1 z28s like they were red headed step children and the car ran 13.0's on street tires 12.55 on a slick (60' like an animal and i couldn't launch on street tires to save my life back then)...
I get it the LS1 is the all-mighty powertrain from the Gods OK... Man let it go. make sure you check out the GT that's already running 8's on stock bottom end hahahahahaha
give credit where credit's due? Ford built another 5.0 to compete with GM's monster 6.2 liter.. I wish my Yukon Denali had a 5.0 liter with the power that engine makes lol it'd save me at least $20 a week in idling around town in traffic
Last edited by TonyGXP; 11-14-2010 at 07:31 PM.
11-14-2010, 07:35 PM
#11
^^ Its not that f-body guys are insensitive, but it becomes a problem when you
go on a f-body site and talk out your *** and say 5th gens suck. If a f-body guy
went on a mustang site and said 5.0's suck you don't think there would be a load of
ford guys getting pissed. So LOL at that. And be honest. Guys are proud of their cars
and when idiots make a blanket statement that camaros suck there's guys that are gonna get pissed. You talking about the 80's 5.0 stangs and the 5.7 iroc. Well the 5.7 iroc with a stall gained over 5 tenths a killed a 80's GT. But since '93 when the LT1 came out GM has dominated. Ford still can't build a good V8, just wait til they add blowers or
N2O then will see. And how many LS1's run 8's on bottom end. The crank can handle
over 1,000 hp its been proven time after time. The new GT hasn't been out long enough to prove its long term reliability. I think its funny how you hold on so tight to a new motor thats running good i agree, but lets see after a few years. The LS1 isn't from the gods just good engine designers. There's 12 year old LS1's still running in the 11's.
go on a f-body site and talk out your *** and say 5th gens suck. If a f-body guy
went on a mustang site and said 5.0's suck you don't think there would be a load of
ford guys getting pissed. So LOL at that. And be honest. Guys are proud of their cars
and when idiots make a blanket statement that camaros suck there's guys that are gonna get pissed. You talking about the 80's 5.0 stangs and the 5.7 iroc. Well the 5.7 iroc with a stall gained over 5 tenths a killed a 80's GT. But since '93 when the LT1 came out GM has dominated. Ford still can't build a good V8, just wait til they add blowers or
N2O then will see. And how many LS1's run 8's on bottom end. The crank can handle
over 1,000 hp its been proven time after time. The new GT hasn't been out long enough to prove its long term reliability. I think its funny how you hold on so tight to a new motor thats running good i agree, but lets see after a few years. The LS1 isn't from the gods just good engine designers. There's 12 year old LS1's still running in the 11's.
Last edited by BlackNiteWS6; 11-14-2010 at 07:41 PM.
11-14-2010, 07:48 PM
#12
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
^^ Its not that f-body guys are insensitive, but it becomes a problem when you
go on a f-body site and talk out your *** and say 5th gens suck. If a f-body guy
went on a mustang site and said 5.0's suck you don't think there would be a load of
ford guys getting pissed. So LOL at that. And be honest. Guys are proud of their cars
and when idiots make a blanket statement that camaros suck there's guys that are gonna get pissed. You talking about the 80's 5.0 stangs and the 5.7 iroc. Well the 5.7 iroc with a stall gained over 5 tenths a killed a 80's GT. But since '93 when the LT1 came out GM has dominated. Ford still can't build a good V8, just wait til they add blowers or
N2O then will see.
go on a f-body site and talk out your *** and say 5th gens suck. If a f-body guy
went on a mustang site and said 5.0's suck you don't think there would be a load of
ford guys getting pissed. So LOL at that. And be honest. Guys are proud of their cars
and when idiots make a blanket statement that camaros suck there's guys that are gonna get pissed. You talking about the 80's 5.0 stangs and the 5.7 iroc. Well the 5.7 iroc with a stall gained over 5 tenths a killed a 80's GT. But since '93 when the LT1 came out GM has dominated. Ford still can't build a good V8, just wait til they add blowers or
N2O then will see.
as for your 5.7 Iroc with a stall? slap the 3.73 in the GT's with a UD & chip and wave bye-bye... my friend that owns 10 second t-type and has owned numerous GN's, TTA & GNX#433 used to smack down our other friend's '92 5.7 Z28 with his '88GT AUTO Stock stall & gears... sometimes it is what it is bro. 9 out of 10 GT vs Fbody races in the 80's left F body owners in the dust, it was that bad, i dont know how old you are but i was driving an Fbody during this time and it held it's own against SOME stock GT's and was handled by minor bolton cars or any 5 speeds driven worth a damn.. as for LX 5.0's? it was just more bitch slapping.. It sucked back then SUCKED!!!!!! someone else chime in please.
11-14-2010, 07:55 PM
#13
Staging Lane
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ms
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wouldn't go talking **** about ANY camaro. It took Ford to finally build a
mustang that runs and that doesn't need a blower to beat a stock LS1 f-body. So Ford blows Jit-head. The new 5.BLOW ****-stang is a low 13 second car stock like the new camaro. And it weighs a lot less. So the mustang ain't that great. You didn't see ****. You're just making up times to justify the mustang. See it's always ******** like you that talk stupid **** like the 5th gen blows is why chevy guys hate mustang guys. It's not the car thats bad its the mustang owners that are jerkoffs. STILL a head/cam 4th gen will walk the new 5.blow and so will a modded 5th gen camaro. So quote facts not your little *** comments.
mustang that runs and that doesn't need a blower to beat a stock LS1 f-body. So Ford blows Jit-head. The new 5.BLOW ****-stang is a low 13 second car stock like the new camaro. And it weighs a lot less. So the mustang ain't that great. You didn't see ****. You're just making up times to justify the mustang. See it's always ******** like you that talk stupid **** like the 5th gen blows is why chevy guys hate mustang guys. It's not the car thats bad its the mustang owners that are jerkoffs. STILL a head/cam 4th gen will walk the new 5.blow and so will a modded 5th gen camaro. So quote facts not your little *** comments.
11-14-2010, 08:05 PM
#14
You don't know crap about my car. The only mustang i lost to was a '03 cobra with a
ported blower and a 75 shot. And i only lost by 2 cars. And i got along great with the guy cause he was cool. He's a rare mustang owner. He doesn't talk stupid talk cause he has a mustang. I gave him high compliments on his car and shook his hand. I actually loved his car. And i also love the 2008 GT500KR. The silver with blue racing stripe is the badest mustang ever made. I smoked plenty of mustangs when i was NA. And after i got N2O it was beating blower and N2O mustangs. And the 80's mustang was a glorified ford escort. They were a tinny POS. They even had drum brakes in the rear..lol. Thats a joke. ALL Irocs got 4 wheel disk brakes. But who the hell cares about a 25 years old car.
Tell me all about the 2000 Cobra when they all got recalled cause they weren't making the 300 hp. Again ford strikes again. Even ford dealerships were telling people no to buy it. My buddy bought a 2000 WS6 cause his friend that was a ford saleman told him to buy an LS1 car..lol. Well ford will add a blower in the future again after the car gains weight to meet the 2012 fed standards. Back to the 14's for the GT..lol. No surprise there..hahaha
ported blower and a 75 shot. And i only lost by 2 cars. And i got along great with the guy cause he was cool. He's a rare mustang owner. He doesn't talk stupid talk cause he has a mustang. I gave him high compliments on his car and shook his hand. I actually loved his car. And i also love the 2008 GT500KR. The silver with blue racing stripe is the badest mustang ever made. I smoked plenty of mustangs when i was NA. And after i got N2O it was beating blower and N2O mustangs. And the 80's mustang was a glorified ford escort. They were a tinny POS. They even had drum brakes in the rear..lol. Thats a joke. ALL Irocs got 4 wheel disk brakes. But who the hell cares about a 25 years old car.
Tell me all about the 2000 Cobra when they all got recalled cause they weren't making the 300 hp. Again ford strikes again. Even ford dealerships were telling people no to buy it. My buddy bought a 2000 WS6 cause his friend that was a ford saleman told him to buy an LS1 car..lol. Well ford will add a blower in the future again after the car gains weight to meet the 2012 fed standards. Back to the 14's for the GT..lol. No surprise there..hahaha
11-14-2010, 08:26 PM
#16
please it didn't take that guy bad mouthing 5th gens to bring on this sentiment it's everywhere on this site, it's pathetic it shows the mustang lovers you guys are frustrated= ford wins.. period.. win with dignity and class and you lose with it.. At the track the 5.0's are absolutely dominating the 5th gens stock vs stock and bolt on v bolt on, period. doing it with 1.2Liter disadvantage, to me that's engineering no matter HOW THEY GOT THERE...
as for your 5.7 Iroc with a stall? slap the 3.73 in the GT's with a UD & chip and wave bye-bye... my friend that owns 10 second t-type and has owned numerous GN's, TTA & GNX#433 used to smack down our other friend's '92 5.7 Z28 with his '88GT AUTO Stock stall & gears... sometimes it is what it is bro. 9 out of 10 GT vs Fbody races in the 80's left F body owners in the dust, it was that bad, i dont know how old you are but i was driving an Fbody during this time and it held it's own against SOME stock GT's and was handled by minor bolton cars or any 5 speeds driven worth a damn.. as for LX 5.0's? it was just more bitch slapping.. It sucked back then SUCKED!!!!!! someone else chime in please.
as for your 5.7 Iroc with a stall? slap the 3.73 in the GT's with a UD & chip and wave bye-bye... my friend that owns 10 second t-type and has owned numerous GN's, TTA & GNX#433 used to smack down our other friend's '92 5.7 Z28 with his '88GT AUTO Stock stall & gears... sometimes it is what it is bro. 9 out of 10 GT vs Fbody races in the 80's left F body owners in the dust, it was that bad, i dont know how old you are but i was driving an Fbody during this time and it held it's own against SOME stock GT's and was handled by minor bolton cars or any 5 speeds driven worth a damn.. as for LX 5.0's? it was just more bitch slapping.. It sucked back then SUCKED!!!!!! someone else chime in please.
Oh you're gonna cry about the cubic inch difference. Thats been done. When the GT gets its weight gain next year ford will add cubes or a blower AGAIN.
Get out of the 80's already...hey lets go back to the 60's. I owned a '92 LX 5.0 and raced a 347cid with a Vortech and a 50 shot and in philly i beat him with only H/C/ bolt ons and a 3,600 stall NA. He laughed at me cause i was only my F1's i walked him twice with my 280lb buddy in the pass. seat. So i bitch slapped that POS. So the LX SUCKED!! Bottom line there's always gonna be a faster car out there. Theres f-bodies that beat mustangs and mustangs that beat f-bodies PERIOD. But go post that all GT's suck on a mustang site. You dont think there will be guys jumping all over your ***. That was my point. Dont make stupid statements like that.
P.S. why do you need other to chime in? This is a GM site. Handle it your self, why you need others?
11-15-2010, 03:58 AM
#17
[QUOTE=TonyGXP;14120391]please it didn't take that guy bad mouthing 5th gens to bring on this sentiment it's everywhere on this site, it's pathetic it shows the mustang lovers you guys are frustrated= ford wins.. period.. win with dignity and class and you lose with it.. At the track the 5.0's are absolutely dominating the 5th gens stock vs stock and bolt on v bolt on, period. doing it with 1.2Liter disadvantage, to me that's engineering no matter HOW THEY GOT THERE...
this guy speeks the truth!
i measure a cars performance by stock or simple perfromance mods,boltons,cams,blower,nitrous.once you start upgrading the internals in the motor,adding ci,etc it just comes down to who has more money cause even a civic can haul major *** with a 10k motor.
this guy speeks the truth!
i measure a cars performance by stock or simple perfromance mods,boltons,cams,blower,nitrous.once you start upgrading the internals in the motor,adding ci,etc it just comes down to who has more money cause even a civic can haul major *** with a 10k motor.
11-15-2010, 04:23 AM
#18
I wouldn't go talking **** about ANY camaro. It took Ford to finally build a
mustang that runs and that doesn't need a blower to beat a stock LS1 f-body. So Ford blows Jit-head. The new 5.BLOW ****-stang is a low 13 second car stock like the new camaro. And it weighs a lot less. So the mustang ain't that great. You didn't see ****. You're just making up times to justify the mustang. See it's always ******** like you that talk stupid **** like the 5th gen blows is why chevy guys hate mustang guys. It's not the car thats bad its the mustang owners that are jerkoffs. STILL a head/cam 4th gen will walk the new 5.blow and so will a modded 5th gen camaro. So quote facts not your little *** comments.
mustang that runs and that doesn't need a blower to beat a stock LS1 f-body. So Ford blows Jit-head. The new 5.BLOW ****-stang is a low 13 second car stock like the new camaro. And it weighs a lot less. So the mustang ain't that great. You didn't see ****. You're just making up times to justify the mustang. See it's always ******** like you that talk stupid **** like the 5th gen blows is why chevy guys hate mustang guys. It's not the car thats bad its the mustang owners that are jerkoffs. STILL a head/cam 4th gen will walk the new 5.blow and so will a modded 5th gen camaro. So quote facts not your little *** comments.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73DDf...eature=related
this is the mustang i saw,it ran these times above with stock stall,yeah it does have drag wheels,no backseat,spare but trapping 118 is damn impressive,thats more trap than your h/c car in sig.
i talked to him after his 11.4 pass and it now has a stall,car still has stock cai,headers,tb.
there is a member on this forum that post in the texas members section that has a manual 5.0 and it is just impressive what his car is doing.2011 GT
12.54 @ 114 at HRP 10/29
11.88 @ 116 at HRP 11/05 tune/et streets only mods
100% stock: 381/367
Tune only: 390/379
now show me a 5th gen running those times and mph that is stock or tune with stock tires or d.r,slicks,
i dont need to lie on what i have witnessed @ san antonio raceway.i go frequently and have never seen a stock or bolton 5th gen run better than a 13.5@110.the fastest slightly modded 5th gen i have personally seen is a black ss(auto)with cam,fast intake/tb,full exhaust,tune,drag wheels.it was runnin mid 12s at no more than 115,i dont remember his exact times because personally i dont think its that impressive
11-15-2010, 04:32 AM
#19
Yep you got it...but there's asses like the guy saying 5th gens blow. His ***
probably was never in one. I drove a manual and a auto and they are built like tanks. I'll bet money after 3 years the mustang rattles like hell, like all
mustangs do. Whats Ford gonna do when they have to add more impact
protection next year? Its a new federal standard. Chevy did it already when they made the new camaro. The 5.0 will be a 14 second car again..lol.
Plus any car adding a procharger or tuning or whatever is gonna run hard.
My buddy ran 12.01@112 mph with only a Vig3200, a Comp 216/220 cam and tuning.Stock manifolds, y-pipe and CB.
its all relative.
probably was never in one. I drove a manual and a auto and they are built like tanks. I'll bet money after 3 years the mustang rattles like hell, like all
mustangs do. Whats Ford gonna do when they have to add more impact
protection next year? Its a new federal standard. Chevy did it already when they made the new camaro. The 5.0 will be a 14 second car again..lol.
Plus any car adding a procharger or tuning or whatever is gonna run hard.
My buddy ran 12.01@112 mph with only a Vig3200, a Comp 216/220 cam and tuning.Stock manifolds, y-pipe and CB.
its all relative.
11-15-2010, 04:46 AM
#20
^^ Its not that f-body guys are insensitive, but it becomes a problem when you
go on a f-body site and talk out your *** and say 5th gens suck. If a f-body guy
went on a mustang site and said 5.0's suck you don't think there would be a load of
ford guys getting pissed. So LOL at that. And be honest. Guys are proud of their cars
and when idiots make a blanket statement that camaros suck there's guys that are gonna get pissed. You talking about the 80's 5.0 stangs and the 5.7 iroc. Well the 5.7 iroc with a stall gained over 5 tenths a killed a 80's GT. But since '93 when the LT1 came out GM has dominated. Ford still can't build a good V8, just wait til they add blowers or
N2O then will see. And how many LS1's run 8's on bottom end. The crank can handle
over 1,000 hp its been proven time after time. The new GT hasn't been out long enough to prove its long term reliability. I think its funny how you hold on so tight to a new motor thats running good i agree, but lets see after a few years. The LS1 isn't from the gods just good engine designers. There's 12 year old LS1's still running in the 11's.
go on a f-body site and talk out your *** and say 5th gens suck. If a f-body guy
went on a mustang site and said 5.0's suck you don't think there would be a load of
ford guys getting pissed. So LOL at that. And be honest. Guys are proud of their cars
and when idiots make a blanket statement that camaros suck there's guys that are gonna get pissed. You talking about the 80's 5.0 stangs and the 5.7 iroc. Well the 5.7 iroc with a stall gained over 5 tenths a killed a 80's GT. But since '93 when the LT1 came out GM has dominated. Ford still can't build a good V8, just wait til they add blowers or
N2O then will see. And how many LS1's run 8's on bottom end. The crank can handle
over 1,000 hp its been proven time after time. The new GT hasn't been out long enough to prove its long term reliability. I think its funny how you hold on so tight to a new motor thats running good i agree, but lets see after a few years. The LS1 isn't from the gods just good engine designers. There's 12 year old LS1's still running in the 11's.
the pros of the 5th gen,styling,motor,brembos.
yall 4th gen owners are really gonna get yalls feeling hurt in bout 7 years when the 5.0 gets down to pricing around the 4th gen f boudys those 12 year old ls1 running 11's are modded,h/c,cam,some bolton with w.r.