Any New ET's with FAST102 Intakes on stock bottom end ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2011, 09:30 PM
  #21  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (10)
 
key4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mac 2002 SS
I've seen .2-.25 tenths gain going from LS6 Intake to a FAST 92/92 set-up on several cars in my area. So I know the FAST 92/92 works !!
good to know. Make my decision even harder now. LOL Did the FTRA help your car and where did you put your trans cooler? Reason I ask my cooler is in the way if was to add the FTRA
Old 04-30-2011, 06:59 AM
  #22  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Mac 2002 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond, VA.
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by key4
good to know. Make my decision even harder now. LOL Did the FTRA help your car and where did you put your trans cooler? Reason I ask my cooler is in the way if was to add the FTRA
for my car ,my ftra gave me .1 tenth and 1 mph gain if I leave the it sealed with the thick strip in front of my air box. if i remove the strip ,i get .15 tenths and 2 mph gain. weird i know . but it works for me.

my tranny cooler is mounted " dope style" . under the front passenger side fender. seem to be fine. it's been there for 3 yrs now without a problem .
Old 05-08-2011, 12:03 PM
  #23  
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
CorbinLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern, NC
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah, this is my problem with the FAST 102. If it really was the answer to all engine intake manifold question then there would be at LEAST 1 track comparison showing results before and after a 102 was installed, I mean, it's not that hard to swap the intake. You would think FAST would do this to prove it's worth if it was actually worth it.

I went with a 90 myself. Why? It's proven.
Old 05-08-2011, 02:18 PM
  #24  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
Mac 2002 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Richmond, VA.
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CorbinLR
Yeah, this is my problem with the FAST 102. If it really was the answer to all engine intake manifold question then there would be at LEAST 1 track comparison showing results before and after a 102 was installed, I mean, it's not that hard to swap the intake. You would think FAST would do this to prove it's worth if it was actually worth it.

I went with a 90 myself. Why? It's proven.
Very well said my friend, very well said.
Old 05-20-2011, 10:30 AM
  #25  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
MARKSZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: bama bitch
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i sold my old 2001 camaro to a friend that grudge races it,5.3 heads mild lsk cam, forged 346,he switched to a fast 102 and picked up average of 20rwhp,no track times he races on a track or so called that does not have timeslips.



Quick Reply: Any New ET's with FAST102 Intakes on stock bottom end ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 PM.