Any New ET's with FAST102 Intakes on stock bottom end ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2011 | 10:30 PM
  #21  
key4's Avatar
TECH Apprentice

iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by Mac 2002 SS
I've seen .2-.25 tenths gain going from LS6 Intake to a FAST 92/92 set-up on several cars in my area. So I know the FAST 92/92 works !!
good to know. Make my decision even harder now. LOL Did the FTRA help your car and where did you put your trans cooler? Reason I ask my cooler is in the way if was to add the FTRA
Old 04-30-2011 | 07:59 AM
  #22  
Mac 2002 SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA.
Default

Originally Posted by key4
good to know. Make my decision even harder now. LOL Did the FTRA help your car and where did you put your trans cooler? Reason I ask my cooler is in the way if was to add the FTRA
for my car ,my ftra gave me .1 tenth and 1 mph gain if I leave the it sealed with the thick strip in front of my air box. if i remove the strip ,i get .15 tenths and 2 mph gain. weird i know . but it works for me.

my tranny cooler is mounted " dope style" . under the front passenger side fender. seem to be fine. it's been there for 3 yrs now without a problem .
Old 05-08-2011 | 01:03 PM
  #23  
CorbinLR's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 127
Likes: 1
From: Eastern, NC
Default

Yeah, this is my problem with the FAST 102. If it really was the answer to all engine intake manifold question then there would be at LEAST 1 track comparison showing results before and after a 102 was installed, I mean, it's not that hard to swap the intake. You would think FAST would do this to prove it's worth if it was actually worth it.

I went with a 90 myself. Why? It's proven.
Old 05-08-2011 | 03:18 PM
  #24  
Mac 2002 SS's Avatar
Thread Starter
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 916
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA.
Default

Originally Posted by CorbinLR
Yeah, this is my problem with the FAST 102. If it really was the answer to all engine intake manifold question then there would be at LEAST 1 track comparison showing results before and after a 102 was installed, I mean, it's not that hard to swap the intake. You would think FAST would do this to prove it's worth if it was actually worth it.

I went with a 90 myself. Why? It's proven.
Very well said my friend, very well said.
Old 05-20-2011 | 11:30 AM
  #25  
MARKSZ71's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: bama bitch
Default

i sold my old 2001 camaro to a friend that grudge races it,5.3 heads mild lsk cam, forged 346,he switched to a fast 102 and picked up average of 20rwhp,no track times he races on a track or so called that does not have timeslips.



Quick Reply: Any New ET's with FAST102 Intakes on stock bottom end ?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:46 PM.